Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Legal Remedies Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

PDF

Michigan Law Review

Breaches of contract

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Legal Remedies

Subrogation -An Equitable Device For Achieving Preferences And Priorities Apr 1933

Subrogation -An Equitable Device For Achieving Preferences And Priorities

Michigan Law Review

Courts are seldom embarrassed in modern times by the poverty of their resources. On the contrary, with the multiplication of "substantive law" formulae and of new procedural devices, their difficulties more often result from the embarrassment of overwhelming riches. This statement may be best illustrated by a brief review of the equitable devices for achieving preferences and priorities, which have developed so rapidly within the last fifty years and have surmounted almost completely the artificial barriers of legal doctrine. In this field the chief effort of the courts must now be not to develop new machinery, but to reexamine the …


Specific Performance - Chattel Contracts Performable In Installments Dec 1932

Specific Performance - Chattel Contracts Performable In Installments

Michigan Law Review

The refusal of a court of equity to decree the performance of a contract relating to personalty is not based on any intrinsic. difference between land and chattels. Any distinction between them is entirely subordinate to the question whether an adequate remedy can be afforded at law. Yet constant repetition has imparted such a degree of rigidity to the rule that courts have been prone to forget the reason on which it rests. Nowhere is this fact more evident than in the field of installment contracts.


Election Of Remedies-Pursuit Of Supposed Remedy As Bar To Suit On Existing Remedy Dec 1930

Election Of Remedies-Pursuit Of Supposed Remedy As Bar To Suit On Existing Remedy

Michigan Law Review

A contracted with B to devise certain lands to B. A conveyed the land to another before his death. B sued C, as executor of the will of A, for damages for A's breach of contract. B's action failed by reason of a plea of the statute of frauds. B then sued C for money expended by him, property delivered, and services rendered in reliance on the alleged contract. Held, B could recover, for the doctrine of election of remedies is no bar unless there are distinct remedies in existence when the action was begun. White v. McKnight (S. …