Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Civil Law (4)
- Courts (4)
- Civil Procedure (2)
- Criminal Law (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
-
- Agency (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (1)
- Criminal Procedure (1)
- Jurisprudence (1)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Law and Race (1)
- Law and Society (1)
- Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Torts (1)
- Keyword
-
- Civil rights; police misconduct; police tort liability; intellectual history of public and private law; public law; private law; intentional infliction of emotional distress; IIED; police accountability law; Section 1983; constitutional tort; tort law; tort liability; middle spaces; racialized policing; (1)
- Injunction; Canada; interlocutory mandatory injunctions; interlocutory prohibitive injunctions; Supreme Court of Canada; R v. Canadian Broadcasting Corp.; strong prima facie case; litigation; trial; American Cyanamid v. Ethicon Ltd.; practical consequences (1)
- Injunctions; nonacquiescence; administrative law; nationwide injunctions; erroneous decisions; forum shopping; judicial review; judicial abuse; Make the Road New York v. McAleenan (1)
- Litigation holds; legal holds; nonparties; discovery; nonparties in discovery; evidence; e-discovery; electronically stored information; ESI; Zubulake; Judge Scheindlin; Sedona Principles; Sedona Conference; subpoena; FRCP Rule 45; spoliation; FRCP; federal rules of civil procedure; duty to preserve evidence (1)
- Sentencing; prosecutorial breach; breach of contract; contractual rights; plea bargain; guilty plea; right to cure; ineffectiveness of counsel; reasonable expectations; deferred remedy; fairness; collusion (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Legal Remedies
Unintended Consequences: The New Test For Interlocutory Mandatory Injunctions, Jeff Berryman
Unintended Consequences: The New Test For Interlocutory Mandatory Injunctions, Jeff Berryman
Brooklyn Law Review
Interlocutory mandatory injunctions can be an important remedy during the pendency of a trial. With its decision in R. v. Canadian Broadcasting Corp, the Supreme Court of Canada revised its test for an interlocutory mandatory injunction, holding that it should require a higher threshold and be therefore harder to obtain than an interlocutory prohibitive injunction. This higher threshold requires that the applicant demonstrate a strong prima facie case that it will succeed at trial based on law and evidence. This change adds uncertainty to the process, ultimately complicating and adding costs to litigation.
Nationwide Injunctions And The Administrative State, Russell L. Weaver
Nationwide Injunctions And The Administrative State, Russell L. Weaver
Brooklyn Law Review
Where an administrative regulation is deemed by a court to be illegal, unconstitutional, or otherwise invalid, courts sometimes issue nationwide injunctions. In other words, instead of holding that the regulation cannot be applied to the individuals before the court, the court prohibits the agency from applying the regulation anywhere in the country, including to others not before the court. This article explores the debate surrounding the appropriateness of nationwide injunctions. While at first glance such injunctions may seem to make sense, they can have serious consequences, including risk of abuse and forum shopping, amplification of erroneous decisions, and the negative …
Nonparty Litigation Holds: Clear To Implement. Complex To Lift., Alexis Bianco-Burrill
Nonparty Litigation Holds: Clear To Implement. Complex To Lift., Alexis Bianco-Burrill
Brooklyn Law Review
Legal holds have long been used by parties, and nonparties alike, as a fundamental tool to preserve information that could be needed in litigation. There are a breadth of statutes, case law, and scholarly work clarifying when a party has the duty to preserve documents and therefore issues legal holds under federal law, as well as when nonparties share this same duty. Although the question of when to issue a legal hold has a clear answer, the problem of when a nonparty can lift a litigation hold is much more complex. Often, nonparties who have been requested to preserve documents …
A New Private Law Of Policing, Cristina Carmody Tilley
A New Private Law Of Policing, Cristina Carmody Tilley
Brooklyn Law Review
American law and American life are asymmetrical. Law divides neatly in two: public and private. But life is lived in three distinct spaces: pure public, pure private, and hybrid middle spaces that are neither state nor home. Which body of law governs the shops, gyms, and workplaces that are formally accessible to all, but functionally hostile to Black, female, poor, and other marginalized Americans? From the liberal midcentury onward, social justice advocates have treated these spaces as fundamentally public and fully remediable via public law equity commands. This article takes a broader view. It urges a tort law revival in …
Plea Bargains, Prosecutorial Breach, And The Curious Right To Cure, Michael D. Cicchini
Plea Bargains, Prosecutorial Breach, And The Curious Right To Cure, Michael D. Cicchini
Brooklyn Law Review
When the prosecutor breaches a plea bargain—e.g., by recommending prison instead of the agreed-upon probation—the defendant is entitled to a remedy: either sentencing in front of a different judge or plea withdrawal. However, if defense counsel objects to the breach, the prosecutor may halfheartedly change the recommendation to probation. Most courts have held that to be an effective “cure”—even when the judge then sentences the defendant to prison, as the prosecutor originally recommended. The right to cure, which was intended for commercial sales contracts, fails miserably in the plea-bargain context. In the above example, the attempted cure is too late, …