Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Bankruptcy Law (1)
- Behavioral Economics (1)
- Criminal Law (1)
- Economic Theory (1)
- Economics (1)
-
- Human Rights Law (1)
- International Humanitarian Law (1)
- International Relations (1)
- International and Area Studies (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Litigation (1)
- Models and Methods (1)
- Other International and Area Studies (1)
- Peace and Conflict Studies (1)
- Political Science (1)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (1)
- Public Policy (1)
- Torts (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Legal Remedies
Can The International Criminal Court Deter Atrocity?, Hyeran Jo, Beth A. Simmons
Can The International Criminal Court Deter Atrocity?, Hyeran Jo, Beth A. Simmons
All Faculty Scholarship
Whether and how violence can be controlled to spare innocent lives is a central issue in international relations. The most ambitious effort to date has been the International Criminal Court (ICC), designed to enhance security and safety by preventing egregious human rights abuses and deterring international crimes. We offer the first systematic assessment of the ICC's deterrent effects for both state and nonstate actors. Although no institution can deter all actors, the ICC can deter some governments and those rebel groups that seek legitimacy. We find support for this conditional impact of the ICC cross-nationally. Our work has implications for …
Everything’S Bigger In Texas: Except The Medmal Settlements, Tom Baker, Eric Helland, Jonathan Klick
Everything’S Bigger In Texas: Except The Medmal Settlements, Tom Baker, Eric Helland, Jonathan Klick
All Faculty Scholarship
Recent work using Texas closed claim data finds that physicians are rarely required to use personal assets in medical malpractice settlements even when plaintiffs secure judgments above the physician's insurance limits. In equilibrium, this should lead physicians to purchase less insurance. Qualitative research on the behavior of plaintiffs suggests that there is a norm under which plaintiffs agree not to pursue personal assets as long as defendants are not grossly underinsured. This norm operates as a soft constraint on physicians. All other things equal, while physicians want to lower their coverage, they do not want to violate the norm and …