Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Administrative searches (1)
- Air carrier's liability (1)
- Airport search (1)
- American Convention on Human Rights (1)
- Atkins v. Virginia (1)
-
- Birth control (1)
- Birth control sabotage (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules Relating to International Transportation by Air (1)
- Convention on the rights of a child (1)
- Cost effective search and seizure (1)
- Cruel and unusual punishment (1)
- DOHSA (1)
- Death on the High Seas Act (1)
- Death penalty (1)
- Death sentence (1)
- Deferential review (1)
- Domestic abuse (1)
- Due process (1)
- Eight amendment (1)
- Evolving standards of decency (1)
- Foreign law (1)
- Foreign opinion (1)
- Fourth amendment (1)
- Geneva convention (1)
- Human rights (1)
- ICCP (1)
- International covenant on Civil and political rights (1)
- International law (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Legal Remedies
Roper V. Simmons - Supreme Court's Reliance On International Law In Constitutional Decision-Making, Jessica Mishali
Roper V. Simmons - Supreme Court's Reliance On International Law In Constitutional Decision-Making, Jessica Mishali
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Exclusivity Of The Warsaw Convention's Cause Of Action: The U.S. Supreme Court Removes Some Of The Expansive Views Foundations In Zicherman V. Korean Air Lines Co. Ltd., Brian S. Tatum
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
The Case For Rational Basis Review Of General Suspicionless Searches And Seizures, Richard C. Worf
The Case For Rational Basis Review Of General Suspicionless Searches And Seizures, Richard C. Worf
Touro Law Review
This article examines the constitutional status of suspicionless searches and seizures of groups- an exceedingly important question in the age of terror, and a subject recently brought back to the forefront by the searches of subway passengers in New York City. It draws on process theory to argue that when a legislature has authorized a group search or seizure, courts should generally apply rational basis review.
First, other areas of constitutional doctrine exhibit deep trust in the power of groups to protect their interests in political process, and there is no reason why fourth amendment doctrine should not do the …
Will There Be A Neurolaw Revolution?, Adam Kolber
Will There Be A Neurolaw Revolution?, Adam Kolber
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Contraceptive Sabotage, Leah A. Plunkett
Contraceptive Sabotage, Leah A. Plunkett
Law Faculty Scholarship
This Article responds to the alarm recently sounded by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists over “birth control sabotage”—the “active interference [by one partner] with [the other] partner’s contraceptive methods in an attempt to promote pregnancy.” Currently, sabotage is not a crime, and existing categories of criminal offenses fail to capture the essence of the injury it does to victims. This Article argues that sabotage should be a separate crime—but only when perpetrated against those partners who can and do get pregnant as a result of having sabotaged sex. Using the principle of self-possession—understood as a person’s basic right …
Onlookers Tell An Extraordinary Entity What To Do, Anita Bernstein
Onlookers Tell An Extraordinary Entity What To Do, Anita Bernstein
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.