Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- AI (1)
- Artificial intelligence (1)
- CRISPR-Cas9 (1)
- Condition (1)
- Conduct (1)
-
- Counseling (1)
- Cybercrime (1)
- Cybercriminal (1)
- Diagnosis (1)
- Dietetics (1)
- Dietician (1)
- Dietitian (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Fourth Industrial Revolution (1)
- Free speech (1)
- Freedom of speech (1)
- Human gene editing (1)
- Incidental (1)
- Internet of Things (1)
- IoT (1)
- License (1)
- Licensing (1)
- Licensure (1)
- Medical (1)
- Medical nutrition therapy (1)
- Nutrition (1)
- Nutritionist (1)
- Occupational (1)
- Other factor (1)
- Personal nexus (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Legal Remedies
The Ratio Method: Addressing Complex Tort Liability In The Fourth Industrial Revolution, Harrison C. Margolin, Grant H. Frazier
The Ratio Method: Addressing Complex Tort Liability In The Fourth Industrial Revolution, Harrison C. Margolin, Grant H. Frazier
St. Mary's Law Journal
Emerging technologies of the Fourth Industrial Revolution show fundamental promise for improving productivity and quality of life, though their misuse may also cause significant social disruption. For example, while artificial intelligence will be used to accelerate society’s processes, it may also displace millions of workers and arm cybercriminals with increasingly powerful hacking capabilities. Similarly, human gene editing shows promise for curing numerous diseases, but also raises significant concerns about adverse health consequences related to the corruption of human and pathogenic genomes.
In most instances, only specialists understand the growing intricacies of these novel technologies. As the complexity and speed of …
A “License To Kale”—Free Speech Challenges To Occupational Licensing Of Nutrition And Dietetics, Taylor J. Newman, Angela E. Surrett
A “License To Kale”—Free Speech Challenges To Occupational Licensing Of Nutrition And Dietetics, Taylor J. Newman, Angela E. Surrett
St. Mary's Law Journal
State licensing of medical professions has occurred for over a century. Recently, these licensure statutes have been subject to First Amendment challenges, alleging occupational licensure impermissibly restricts freedom of speech. This Comment addresses these free speech challenges, arguing occupational licensure statutes, at least for medical professions, only incidentally impacts free speech—if at all—by permissibly regulating medical professional conduct necessarily requiring speech. Within, the authors ultimately describe, demonstrate, and recommend a legal framework, the other factor/personal nexus approach. This approach helps determine the point at which speech becomes regulable professional conduct subject to licensing, utilizing the nutrition and dietetics profession, and …