Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- 50th anniversary (1)
- Aliens (1)
- Arizona (1)
- Arizona v. California (1)
- Asylum (1)
-
- Basin Study Interim Guidelines (1)
- California (1)
- Campaign committee liabilities (1)
- Campaign committee obligations (1)
- Campaign committees (1)
- Campaign funds (1)
- Colorado River (1)
- Colorado River Compact (1)
- Colorado River Water Conservation District (1)
- Colorado River basin (1)
- Controversy (1)
- Debt (1)
- Deportation (1)
- Detainee (1)
- Enemy combatant (1)
- Federal reserved rights (1)
- Governance (1)
- Grand Canyon (1)
- Habeas relief (1)
- Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (1)
- Immigration (1)
- Immigration law (1)
- Indian tribes (1)
- International law (1)
- Interstate rivers (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Legal Remedies
Agenda: Arizona V. California At 50: The Legacy And Future Of Governance, Reserved Rights, And Water Transfers, University Of Colorado Boulder. Getches-Wilkinson Center For Natural Resources, Energy, And The Environment
Agenda: Arizona V. California At 50: The Legacy And Future Of Governance, Reserved Rights, And Water Transfers, University Of Colorado Boulder. Getches-Wilkinson Center For Natural Resources, Energy, And The Environment
Arizona v. California at 50: The Legacy and Future of Governance, Reserved Rights, and Water Transfers (Martz Summer Conference, August 15-16)
The Colorado River is an economic, environmental and cultural lifeline of the southwestern United States, and the allocation of its scarce waters are a source of ongoing controversy. This year marks the 50th anniversary of the Supreme Court decision in Arizona v. California. While the case was an important landmark in the still-evolving relationship between these two Lower Basin states, it remains most relevant today by the way in which it clarified federal rights and responsibilities. This is especially true in the areas of federal (including tribal) reserved rights, the role of the Interior Secretary in Lower Basin water …
The Supreme Court's Take On Immigration In Nken V. Holder: Reaffirming A Traditional Standard That Affords Courts More Time And Flexibility To Decide Immigration Appeals Before Deporting Aliens, Elizaveta Kabanova
Journal of the National Association of Administrative Law Judiciary
No abstract provided.
Liability Of Political Candidates And Their Staffs For Campaign Committee Obligations , Anthony J. Mohr
Liability Of Political Candidates And Their Staffs For Campaign Committee Obligations , Anthony J. Mohr
Pepperdine Law Review
No abstract provided.
Of Civil Wrongs And Rights: Kiyemba V. Obama And The Meaning Of Freedom, Separation Of Powers, And The Rule Of Law Ten Years After 9/11, Katherine L. Vaughns, Heather L. Williams
Of Civil Wrongs And Rights: Kiyemba V. Obama And The Meaning Of Freedom, Separation Of Powers, And The Rule Of Law Ten Years After 9/11, Katherine L. Vaughns, Heather L. Williams
Faculty Scholarship
This article is about the rise and fall of continued adherence to the rule of law, proper application of the separation of powers doctrine, and the meaning of freedom for a group of seventeen Uighurs—a Turkic Muslim ethnic minority whose members reside in the Xinjiang province of China—who had been held at the Guantanamo Bay Naval Base since 2002. Most scholars regard the trilogy of Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, and Boumediene v. Bush as demonstrating the Supreme Court’s willingness to uphold the rule of law during the war on terror. The recent experience of the Uighurs …