Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Administrative decisions (1)
- Article III (1)
- Bennett v. Spear (1)
- Black codes (1)
- Civil Rights Act of 1866 (1)
-
- Civil Rights Act of 1964 (1)
- Collective bargaining agreements (1)
- Compensatory damages (1)
- Congressional intent (1)
- Derecho Procesal Civil (1)
- Discriminatory (1)
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (1)
- Evers v. Dwyer (1)
- Fair Employment Council of Greater Washington Inc. v. BMC Marketing Corp. (1)
- Havens Realty Corporation v. Coleman (1)
- Injury-in-fact (1)
- Judicial deference (1)
- Kyles v. J.K. Guardian Security Services (1)
- Lyons v. City of Los Angeles (1)
- Patterson v. McLean Credit Union (1)
- Pierson v. Ray (1)
- Preemption (1)
- Prudential (1)
- Remedies (1)
- Seventh Circuit (1)
- Testing (1)
- Tort relief (1)
- Wards Cove Packing Co. v Atonio (1)
- Washington (1)
- Wrongful discharge (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Legal Remedies
The Case Against Employment Tester Standing Under Title Vii And 42 U.S.C. § 1981, Michael Bowling
The Case Against Employment Tester Standing Under Title Vii And 42 U.S.C. § 1981, Michael Bowling
Michigan Law Review
In 1964, Congress passed comprehensive legislation aimed at eradicating discrimination in employment, public accommodations, public facilities, public schools, and federal benefit programs. Title VII of this Act directed its aim specifically at stamping out prejudice in employment. Four years later, the Supreme Court resurrected the provisions of § 1 of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which, among other things, protects citizens, regardless of race or color, in their right to "make and enforce [employment] contracts." Together, Title VII and § 1981 serve as the primary legal bases for challenging racially discriminatory actioris by private employers. More than thirty years …
Knicks-Heat And The Appropriateness Of Sanctions In Sport, Lewis Kurlantzick
Knicks-Heat And The Appropriateness Of Sanctions In Sport, Lewis Kurlantzick
Faculty Articles and Papers
No abstract provided.
Teoría General De La Prueba Judicial, Edward Ivan Cueva
Teoría General De La Prueba Judicial, Edward Ivan Cueva
Edward Ivan Cueva
No abstract provided.
Smith V. Bates Technical College: Washington Extends The Availability Of The Tort Of Wrongful Discharge In Violation Of Public Policy, But A Little Too Far: Employees Should Still Exhaust Other Remedies, Richard A. Morris
Seattle University Law Review
This Note will present and analyze two significant issues addressed by the Smith court. First, the court properly decided that state common law claims are not preempted by collective bargaining agreements or available administrative procedures. Second, the court incorrectly determined that exhaustion of administrative or contractual remedies is not a prerequisite to seeking tort relief in court. The judiciary should give deference to administrative or contractual procedures specifically designed to resolve the matter in dispute. This Note will analyze the preemption issue by first examining, in Part II, the general function of common law torts, the doctrine of employment-at-will, and …