Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Remedies (2)
- Abrams v. Baylor College of Medicine (1)
- Antiboycott provision (1)
- Arbitration (1)
- Bulk Oil (ZUG) A.G. v. Sun Company (1)
-
- Cannon v. University of Chicago (1)
- Cause of action (1)
- Civil Law (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Class actions (1)
- Conflict of Laws (1)
- Congressional intent (1)
- Constitutional (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Consumer Protection Law (1)
- Consumer law (1)
- Corrective remedies (1)
- Cort factors (1)
- Cort v. Ash (1)
- Costs (1)
- Court costs (1)
- Criminal Law and Procedure (1)
- Damages (1)
- Domestic Relations (1)
- Due Process (1)
- EAA (1)
- Eighth Amendment (1)
- Equal Protection (1)
- Equality (1)
- Export Administration Act of 1979 (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Legal Remedies
The High Price Of Poverty: A Study Of How The Majority Of Current Court System Procedures For Collecting Court Costs And Fees, As Well As Fines, Have Failed To Adhere To Established Precedent And The Constitutional Guarantees They Advocate., Trevor J. Calligan
Trevor J Calligan
No abstract provided.
An Essay On Private Remedies, Emily Sherwin
Export Controls - A Private Cause Of Action Under The Export Administration Act Of 1979, Wilbur Owens
Export Controls - A Private Cause Of Action Under The Export Administration Act Of 1979, Wilbur Owens
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Individualized Injunctions And No-Modification Terms: Challenging "Anti-Reform" Provisions In Arbitration Clauses, Myriam E. Gilles
Individualized Injunctions And No-Modification Terms: Challenging "Anti-Reform" Provisions In Arbitration Clauses, Myriam E. Gilles
Faculty Articles
The Supreme Court’s recent decisions in AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion and American Express v. Italian Colors have considered only whether class actions for monetary damages may be barred by arbitration clauses requiring individual adjudication. The Justices have not examined the enforceability of arbitration clauses or arbitral rules which explicitly prohibit claimants from seeking or arbitrators from granting broad injunctive relief in an individual dispute. I term these "anti-reform" provisions because they broadly prohibit an individual arbitral claimant from seeking to end a practice, change a rule, or enjoin an act that causes injury to itself and to similarly-situated non-parties. This …