Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Negotiation (2)
- Antitrust (1)
- Author (1)
- Author-publisher contract (1)
- Cablevision (1)
-
- Copy (1)
- Copyright Act (1)
- Equal (1)
- Federal courts (1)
- Judgments (1)
- Jurisdiction retention (1)
- Liability (1)
- Licenses (1)
- Monopolies (1)
- Profit (1)
- Public performance (1)
- Publisher (1)
- Rate setting (1)
- Rights (1)
- Second Circuit (1)
- Subscriber (1)
- “Remote Storage” Digital Video Recorder System (“RS-DVR”) (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Legal Remedies
Bargaining In The Shadow Of Rate-Setting Courts, Daniel A. Crane
Bargaining In The Shadow Of Rate-Setting Courts, Daniel A. Crane
Articles
Judges will tell you that they are comparatively poor rate regulators. The specialized, technical competence and supervisory capacity that public utilities commissions enjoy are usually absent from judicial chambers. Nonetheless, when granting antitrust remedies-particularly remedies for monopolistic abuse of intellectual property-courts sometimes purport to act as rate regulators for the licensing or sale of the defendant's assets. At the outset, we should distinguish between two forms ofjudicial rate setting. In one form, a court (or the FTC in its adjudicative capacity) grants a compulsory license and sets a specific rate as part of a final judgment or an order. The …
The Contemporary Guide To Negotiating The Author-Publisher Contract, Martin P. Levin
The Contemporary Guide To Negotiating The Author-Publisher Contract, Martin P. Levin
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.
Post-Litigation Enforcement Of Remedial Orders Issued By The U.S. International Trade Commission In Section 337 Investigations, 8 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 248 (2009), Merritt R. Blakeslee
Post-Litigation Enforcement Of Remedial Orders Issued By The U.S. International Trade Commission In Section 337 Investigations, 8 J. Marshall Rev. Intell. Prop. L. 248 (2009), Merritt R. Blakeslee
UIC Review of Intellectual Property Law
There is a common misperception that enforcement of International Trade Commission (“ITC”) remedial orders is automatic and self implementing. In reality, such remedial orders are not self-implementing, are less-than-perfect enforcement tools, and their effective enforcement carries with it a number of practical difficulties. This paper explores the realities of enforcing the ITC’s remedial orders – exclusion orders, consent orders, and cease-and-desist orders – with the goal of giving both complainants and respondents a heightened appreciation of the tactics and strategies that can be effectively deployed following the conclusion of a Section 337 investigation and the issuance of one or more …
Cartoon Network Lp, Lllp V. Csc Holdings, Inc., Marc Miller
Cartoon Network Lp, Lllp V. Csc Holdings, Inc., Marc Miller
NYLS Law Review
No abstract provided.