Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank); Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC); Systemically Important; Non-Bank Companies; General Electric (GE); MetLife (1)
- Inc. (MetLife; Systemically Important Financial institutions (SIFI); Enhanced Regulation; U.S. Treasury Department; Fair Hearings; Evidentiary Hearing Procedures; Administrative Procedure Act; MetLife (1)
- Inc. v. Financial Stability Oversight Council; Designation Process and Challenges; Insurance Companies; Stress Tests; Judicial Review; Financial Distress; Inconsistent with FSOC Guidance; Right to Discovery; Administrative Procedure Act (APA); Formal Adjudications; Interval Hearing System; "Trial by Surprise"; Right to Appeals; Impartial Panel; Exchaustion; Legislative Reform (1)
- Injunctions; nonacquiescence; administrative law; nationwide injunctions; erroneous decisions; forum shopping; judicial review; judicial abuse; Make the Road New York v. McAleenan (1)
- Jurisdiction; subject matter jurisdiction; immigration; Article III; jurisdiction-stripping; IIRIRA; 1252(g); due process; separation of powers; Silva; Arce; Reno; Federal Tort Claims Act; FTCA; American-Arab Anti Discrimination-Committee; judicial review; wrongful removal; Mathews (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Legal Remedies
Nationwide Injunctions And The Administrative State, Russell L. Weaver
Nationwide Injunctions And The Administrative State, Russell L. Weaver
Brooklyn Law Review
Where an administrative regulation is deemed by a court to be illegal, unconstitutional, or otherwise invalid, courts sometimes issue nationwide injunctions. In other words, instead of holding that the regulation cannot be applied to the individuals before the court, the court prohibits the agency from applying the regulation anywhere in the country, including to others not before the court. This article explores the debate surrounding the appropriateness of nationwide injunctions. While at first glance such injunctions may seem to make sense, they can have serious consequences, including risk of abuse and forum shopping, amplification of erroneous decisions, and the negative …
Without A Voice, Without A Forum: Finding Iirira Section 1252(G) Unconstitutional, Amanda Simms
Without A Voice, Without A Forum: Finding Iirira Section 1252(G) Unconstitutional, Amanda Simms
Brooklyn Law Review
The Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) abrogates sovereign immunity in certain circumstances to allow private individuals, regardless of citizenship, to sue the United States for specific torts committed by government officials. Yet when two lawful permanent residents—located in different parts of the country—separately tried to sue the government for wrongful removal, one court dismissed the suit for lack of subject matter jurisdiction while the other court did not. These decisions, though reaching opposite conclusions, both relied on federal immigration statute 8 U.S.C. § 1252(g) in order to determine whether judicial review of immigrants’ removal orders is precluded. This note argues …
Challenging Nonbank Sifi Designations: Ge, Metlife, And The Need For Reform, Drita Dokic
Challenging Nonbank Sifi Designations: Ge, Metlife, And The Need For Reform, Drita Dokic
Brooklyn Journal of Corporate, Financial & Commercial Law
The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act created, among other things, the Financial Stability Oversight Council (FSOC), an entity within the U.S. Department of the Treasury tasked with assessing and mitigating financial risk. Financial institutions with over $50 billion in assets are automatically deemed “systemically important.” However, under the Dodd-Frank Act, FSOC has the authority to designate non-bank companies engaged in financial activity as systemically important as well. Once designated as a systemically important financial institution (SIFI), these companies are subject to enhanced regulation and supervision by the Federal Reserve. Because the costs associated with such enhanced regulation …
Fortifying The Rights Of Unauthorized Immigrant Workers: Why Employee-Focused Incentives Under The Nlra Would Help End The Cycle Of Labor Rights Abuse, Caitlin E. Delaney
Fortifying The Rights Of Unauthorized Immigrant Workers: Why Employee-Focused Incentives Under The Nlra Would Help End The Cycle Of Labor Rights Abuse, Caitlin E. Delaney
Journal of Law and Policy
Over the past several decades, there has been an unmistakable tension between labor law and immigration law in the United States. That tension, addressed by the Supreme Court most recently in 2001, still exists for unauthorized immigrant workers who wish to assert their labor rights under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). While the Obama Administration has made significant strides in easing the concerns that unauthorized immigrant workers may have before filing an NLRA claim, the unavailability of the back pay remedy and the uncertainty of protection from immigration authorities leave little incentive for such workers to assert their labor …