Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional law (1)
- Coordinate construction (1)
- Departmentalism (1)
- Discretion (1)
- Election law (1)
-
- Equal dignity principle (1)
- Executive branch (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Invalidation (1)
- Law of democracy (1)
- Legal history (1)
- Legislation (1)
- Lobbying (1)
- Minority representation (1)
- Petition Clause (1)
- Petitioning (1)
- Separation of powers (1)
- Signing statements (1)
- Statutory interpretation (1)
- Textualism (1)
- Veto power (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
Lobbying And The Petition Clause, Maggie Blackhawk
Lobbying And The Petition Clause, Maggie Blackhawk
All Faculty Scholarship
Contrary to popular opinion, the Supreme Court has not yet resolved whether lobbying is constitutionally protected. Belying this fact, courts, Congress, and scholars mistakenly assume that lobbying is protected under the Petition Clause. Because scholars have shared the mistaken assumption that the Petition Clause protects the practice of “lobbying”, no research to date has looked closely at the Petition Clause doctrine and the history of petitioning in relation to lobbying. In a recent opinion addressing petitioning in another context, the Supreme Court unearthed the long history behind the right to petition and argued for the importance of this history for …
Presidential Signing Statements: A New Perspective, Christopher S. Yoo
Presidential Signing Statements: A New Perspective, Christopher S. Yoo
All Faculty Scholarship
This Article offers a new perspective on Presidents’ use of signing statements. Following the dichotomy reflected in the literature, I will analyze signing statements raising constitutional objections and those offering interpretive guidance for ambiguous provisions separately. With respect to constitutional interpretation of statutes by the executive branch, Presidents have long asserted the authority and obligation to consider constitutionality when executing statutes. The widespread acceptance of the President’s power to construe statutes to avoid constitutional problems and to refuse to defend the constitutionality of or to enforce statutes in appropriate cases confirms the propriety of this conclusion. If these fairly uncontroversial …