Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Administrative law (1)
- Apologetics (1)
- Constitution (1)
- Constitutional right AND drugs (1)
- Drug decriminalization (1)
-
- Drug legalization (1)
- Drug overdose (1)
- Drug trafficking (1)
- Drugs (1)
- Economics AND drugs (1)
- Evidence (1)
- Gospels (1)
- Greenleaf (1)
- Gundy v. United States (1)
- Health effects AND drugs (1)
- Justice Barrett (1)
- Justice Kavanaugh (1)
- Law (1)
- Naturalism (1)
- Nondelegation (1)
- Opponents of drug legalization (1)
- Supporters of drug legalization (1)
- Supreme Court (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
Drug Ideologies Of The United States, Macy Montgomery
Drug Ideologies Of The United States, Macy Montgomery
Helm's School of Government Conference - American Revival: Citizenship & Virtue
The United States has been increasingly creating lenient drug policies. Seventeen states and Washington, the District of Columbia, legalized marijuana, and Oregon decriminalized certain drugs, including methamphetamine, heroin, and cocaine. The medical community has proven that drugs, including marijuana, have myriad adverse health side effects. This leads to two questions: Why does the United States government continue to create lenient drug policies, and what reasons do citizens give for legalizing drugs when the medical community has proven them harmful? The paper hypothesizes that the disadvantages of drug legalization outweigh its benefits because of the numerous harms it causes, such as …
The Return Of A Judicial Artifact? How The Supreme Court Could Examine The Question Of The Nondelegation Doctrine’S Place In Future Cases, Dalton Davis
Helms School of Government Undergraduate Law Review
No abstract provided.
Seeking Truth On The Other Side Of The Wall: Greenleaf’S Evangelists Meet The Federal Rules, Naturalism, And Judas, Nancy J. Kippenhan
Seeking Truth On The Other Side Of The Wall: Greenleaf’S Evangelists Meet The Federal Rules, Naturalism, And Judas, Nancy J. Kippenhan
Faculty Publications and Presentations
An inquiry that seeks truth by accepting only natural answers excludes the possibility of the sacred or supernatural, building a wall that forecloses a complete exploration for the truth it seeks. Without analysis, critics dismiss sources presenting supernatural explanations, and those who believe sacred works have no factual foundation accept without investigation any popular theory that appears attractive. The rules of evidence expressly seek truth, wherever it lies. Noted legal scholar Simon Greenleaf used evidentiary principles to demonstrate the factual credibility of the Gospels in his Testimony of the Evangelists. This Article examines Greenleaf’s analysis, applying current rules of evidence …