Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- Seattle University School of Law (259)
- University of Michigan Law School (230)
- Universitas Indonesia (121)
- UIC School of Law (102)
- University of Colorado Law School (97)
-
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (93)
- Georgetown University Law Center (74)
- BLR (62)
- American University Washington College of Law (50)
- Duke Law (45)
- Texas A&M University School of Law (45)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (40)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (36)
- Notre Dame Law School (36)
- William & Mary Law School (36)
- New York Law School (35)
- Fordham Law School (34)
- Pepperdine University (34)
- Boston University School of Law (33)
- University of Richmond (32)
- Brooklyn Law School (31)
- University of Georgia School of Law (31)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (30)
- Columbia Law School (29)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (29)
- Cornell University Law School (28)
- Liberty University (28)
- Penn State Dickinson Law (28)
- Northwestern Pritzker School of Law (26)
- Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law (21)
- Keyword
-
- Constitution (229)
- Constitutional law (193)
- Constitutional Law (192)
- Legal History (158)
- History (120)
-
- Legal history (109)
- Supreme Court (102)
- Originalism (94)
- Constitutional history (71)
- Jurisprudence (70)
- Constitutional interpretation (68)
- United States Supreme Court (63)
- Federalism (61)
- Congress (58)
- First Amendment (52)
- Fourteenth Amendment (51)
- Judicial review (46)
- Law (44)
- Courts (41)
- Legislation (40)
- Separation of powers (38)
- United States (38)
- Judges (37)
- Due process (36)
- Law and Society (34)
- Slavery (33)
- Politics (30)
- Constitutional theory (28)
- Democracy (28)
- Fifth Amendment (26)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Seattle University Law Review (225)
- Faculty Scholarship (192)
- Michigan Law Review (161)
- "Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI (121)
- UIC Law Review (94)
-
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (71)
- Cardozo Law Review (61)
- ExpressO (60)
- Publications (58)
- Articles (56)
- NYLS Law Review (30)
- Faculty Publications (29)
- Pepperdine Law Review (29)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (27)
- Scholarly Works (27)
- Seattle Journal for Social Justice (27)
- Law Faculty Publications (26)
- Dickinson Law Review (2017-Present) (25)
- Journal Articles (24)
- Touro Law Review (24)
- Indiana Law Journal (21)
- William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal (20)
- American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law (19)
- Faculty Publications and Presentations (18)
- Northwestern University Law Review (18)
- Western Water Law in Transition (Summer Conference, June 3-5) (18)
- All Faculty Scholarship (16)
- American University Law Review (16)
- Arkansas Law Review (16)
- Fordham Law Review (14)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 2187
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
The Silent Bench: How The Chilean Judiciary Failed To Check Pinochet's Executive Power And The Continued Struggle For Judicial Independence, Daniela González García
The Silent Bench: How The Chilean Judiciary Failed To Check Pinochet's Executive Power And The Continued Struggle For Judicial Independence, Daniela González García
Latin American & Caribbean Law Review
Although authoritarian regimes are often associated with lawlessness, many consolidate power through carefully crafted legal framework that create the illusion of illegality. Chile under Augusto Pinochet offers a critical case study of this phenomenon. In Chile, Pinochet ushered in his “authoritarian legality” after spearheading a military coup in 1973 that toppled a democratically elected left-wing government. Through Chile’s 1980 Constitution, drafted by hand-picked loyalists and approved in a tightly controlled setting, Pinochet’s regime embedded executive supremacy, restricted judicial review, and transformed Chile’s courts into a silent bench. Applying David S. Clark’s theory that judicial review must be evaluated within a …
Constitutions, The State And Law In Republican Venezuela (1830-2025), Rogelio Pérez-Perdomo
Constitutions, The State And Law In Republican Venezuela (1830-2025), Rogelio Pérez-Perdomo
Latin American & Caribbean Law Review
This panoramic article poses the question of the relation between the state, the constitution and the law in Venezuelan republican history. In the 19th century, Venezuela became independent, congresses approved constitutions that organized the national state, comprehensive legal codes and legislation were produced and the universities developed legal studies and produced a small number of lawyers. Nevertheless, the law had little impact on a turbulent and impoverished country, and lawyers mainly found occupation in the state and political system. In the 20th century, Venezuela constructed a powerful state that pacified the country that created conditions for a relatively prosperous economy. …
Originalism's General-Law Turn, Nina Varsava, Bill Watson
Originalism's General-Law Turn, Nina Varsava, Bill Watson
Northwestern University Law Review
Originalists are increasingly turning to a general-law theory of constitutional rights. Under this theory, constitutional enactment declared but did not create constitutional rights. The content of those rights was, and remains, a question of general law—a species of common law, regularly employed at the Founding, that transcends jurisdictional boundaries. This preoccupation with general law has precipitated a wave of scholarship developing general-law accounts of various constitutional rights. Yet the nature of general law itself remains poorly understood.
This Article offers a theory of general law. Using philosophical methods to reexamine early American cases and recent work in legal history, the …
The Alien Enemies Act Of 1798, Andrew Kent
The Alien Enemies Act Of 1798, Andrew Kent
Fordham Law Review
For the first time since World War II—and for the first time ever outside a formally declared war—an American president has invoked the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to detain and deport noncitizens. Enacted during the Quasi-War with France, the Act’s operative language remains largely unchanged today. In March 2025, President Donald J. Trump proclaimed that members of the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua present in the United States are “alien enemies,” asserting that their activities, allegedly coordinated with President Nicolás Maduro’s government, constitute an “invasion” or “predatory incursion” within the meaning of the statute. Litigation challenging the invocation of …
Litigating Birthright Citizenship In The Shadow Of World War Ii: The Continuing Relevance Of A Forgotten Case, Rachel E. Rosenbloom
Litigating Birthright Citizenship In The Shadow Of World War Ii: The Continuing Relevance Of A Forgotten Case, Rachel E. Rosenbloom
Michigan Journal of Race and Law
With the question of birthright citizenship before the Supreme Court this term in Trump v. Barbara, this Article explores the last time that federal courts confronted an attempt to restrict birthright citizenship. It tells the story of two lawsuits, Regan v. King and Fisk v. Wade, filed in 1942 by organizations seeking to overturn United States v. Wong Kim Ark, the 1898 Supreme Court decision that affirmed the broad scope of birthright citizenship under the Fourteenth Amendment. While the cases left little mark doctrinally, their history sheds light on a dimension of birthright citizenship litigation that has …
Getting Money Out Of Politics By Putting Money Into Politics: A Few Modest Proposals To Reform Seattle’S Democracy Voucher Program, Decker O’Donnell
Getting Money Out Of Politics By Putting Money Into Politics: A Few Modest Proposals To Reform Seattle’S Democracy Voucher Program, Decker O’Donnell
Seattle University Law Review
Seattle’s Democracy Voucher Program offers an unconventional response to the growing influence of money in American elections: rather than restricting political spending, it seeks to amplify the participation of ordinary voters by providing publicly funded vouchers that residents may assign to participating candidates. This Article examines the program’s development, operation, and constitutional foundation within the modern campaign-finance framework established by Buckley v. Valeo and subsequent Supreme Court decisions. It argues that democracy vouchers provide a constitutionally viable means of broadening participation in campaign financing while mitigating the influence of wealthy donors. The Article identifies two weaknesses in the current system: …
Who Decides The Dead? Interpreting Washington’S Disposition Of Remains Statute, Wyatt Young
Who Decides The Dead? Interpreting Washington’S Disposition Of Remains Statute, Wyatt Young
Seattle University Law Review
Washington’s disposition-of-remains statute, RCW 68.50.160, is designed to honor a decedent’s expressed wishes regarding the control and disposition of their body after death. Yet recent litigation reveals a critical gap between the statute’s intent-centered design and its practical enforceability. In Larotonda v. Blackburn, a trial court acknowledged that irreparable harm would occur if a decedent’s burial wishes were ignored but nonetheless denied relief on the grounds that the individual designated to carry out those wishes lacked standing. The result was a legal paradox: a statute that recognizes decedent autonomy in theory but withholds any meaningful mechanism for its enforcement …
Legal Malpractice In Washington: Use Of The Rules Of Professional Conduct, Angelo Tadrous
Legal Malpractice In Washington: Use Of The Rules Of Professional Conduct, Angelo Tadrous
Seattle University Law Review
Legal malpractice claims are difficult to prove. They are difficult to prove because many jurisdictions require that a plaintiff prove that, but for the lawyer’s misconduct, the client would have fared better. Thus, in a malpractice suit, a plaintiff must try a case within a case. Despite this difficulty, many jurisdictions prohibit the use of the Rules of Professional Conduct when litigating a malpractice case. Washington State is one of these jurisdictions. The Washington Supreme Court held in Hizey v. Carpenter that the Rules of Professional Conduct may not be referred to during trial. This Note argues that this prohibition …
Converting Buildings Is Hard: Why Seattle’S Municipal Government Should Streamline Commercial-To-Residential Conversions, Tyler M. King
Converting Buildings Is Hard: Why Seattle’S Municipal Government Should Streamline Commercial-To-Residential Conversions, Tyler M. King
Seattle University Law Review
The conversion of commercial buildings into housing is a promising solution to the growing housing crisis in many urban areas. However, despite its potential benefits, the process of repurposing commercial spaces is often stymied by complex zoning codes, high conversion costs, and bureaucratic hurdles. This Article argues that the local and state governments in Seattle should adopt more streamlined policies and offer greater incentives to developers to facilitate these conversions. By reforming zoning regulations and providing targeted financial support, municipalities can reduce the barriers to conversion and unlock the potential of underutilized commercial properties. This article examines the legal and …
Le Conseil D’État : Histoire Et Évolution, Antoine Khair
Le Conseil D’État : Histoire Et Évolution, Antoine Khair
Proche-Orient, Études juridiques
No abstract provided.
The Possibilities Of Constitutional Education, Mark Jia
The Possibilities Of Constitutional Education, Mark Jia
Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works
Constitutional scholarship has traditionally focused on formal constitutional actors: courts, legislatures, and executives. These actors are often regarded as primary sources of constitutional law, or in some cases, as final arbiters of constitutional meaning. More peripheral in this literature are actors thought to transmit what courts and high officials have established. These constitutional educators, including law professors, legal journalists, and civics planners, are often overlooked for defensible reasons: They lack the normative authorities of formal institutional actors, and they do not exercise power as it is often understood in public law.
This Article advances a general theory of constitutional education …
مشروع قانون الإرث لغير المحمديين الجديد ومقارنته مع القانون الحالي, Poej
مشروع قانون الإرث لغير المحمديين الجديد ومقارنته مع القانون الحالي, Poej
Proche-Orient, Études juridiques
No abstract provided.
Le Nouveau Projet De Loi Successorale Au Liban, Ibrahim Najjar
Le Nouveau Projet De Loi Successorale Au Liban, Ibrahim Najjar
Proche-Orient, Études juridiques
No abstract provided.
Is Originalism Orthodoxy?, Neel Sukhatme
Is Originalism Orthodoxy?, Neel Sukhatme
Articles
What theory of constitutional interpretation has the Supreme Court followed? We search Supreme Court opinions for a wide range of sources that originalists identify as central to their methodology, over the entire universe of cases beginning in 1791. We find that for much of Supreme Court history, conventional indicators of originalist practice--citations to Founding-era sources--are largely absent, raising questions about originalism's past orthodoxy. Originalist citation practices are absent for much of the 19th century and grow sharply in the late 20th century. The Article elaborates the implications of these findings for debates in constitutional law.
The Intertemporal Law Doctrine's Application To The Acquisition Of Colonies In The Americas, Kent Mcneil
The Intertemporal Law Doctrine's Application To The Acquisition Of Colonies In The Americas, Kent Mcneil
Notre Dame Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Review Of Gautam Bhatia’S The Indian Constitution: A Conversation With Power, Aishwarya Singh
Review Of Gautam Bhatia’S The Indian Constitution: A Conversation With Power, Aishwarya Singh
National Law School of India Review
.
Rethinking International Armed Conflict: Legal Challenges In The Age Of Hybrid Warfare, Oleksandr Havryshuk, Roman Hryshchenko
Rethinking International Armed Conflict: Legal Challenges In The Age Of Hybrid Warfare, Oleksandr Havryshuk, Roman Hryshchenko
Brooklyn Journal of International Law
The binary classification of armed conflicts under international humanitarian law (IHL) — distinguishing international armed conflicts (IACs) from non-international armed conflicts (NIACs) — was forged in the aftermath of World War II and increasingly fails to capture the realities of twenty-first century warfare. Hybrid tactics, cyber operations, the proliferation of private military companies (PMCs), the expanding role of non-state actors, and the near-disappearance of formal declarations of war have eroded the analytical utility of the existing framework, generating legal uncertainty and weakening protections for affected populations. This Article critically examines the conceptual foundations of IAC as set out in Common …
Navigating The Legal Waters Of Privatized Commodities And Human Rights: An Exploration Of The Tension Between Water As A Human Right And Water As Investment Property Under International Law, Ella Capen
Brooklyn Journal of International Law
This Note examines the clash between domestic law and international law within the context of Chile’s 2022 modification to the 1981 Water Code as the country transitions from treating water as a privatized commodity to water as a public good. Chile’s 1981 Water Code emerged against the backdrop of a neoliberal economic regime and privatization scheme enabled by the United States and enforced by dictator Augusto Pinochet. This Note reveals the potential difficulties in unraveling established economic and legal foundations, and the conflicts between bilateral investment treaties and local legislation that mutually govern property rights. By examining Chile’s domestic Law …
Reimagining Legal Education: The Transformative Power Of Small-Group Instruction, Michael I. Meyerson
Reimagining Legal Education: The Transformative Power Of Small-Group Instruction, Michael I. Meyerson
Seattle University Law Review
Legal education is failing its students. Those entering their first year of law school have greater anxiety and less developed reading and writing skills than ever before. The traditional large Socratic class, which was never the most effective teaching method, has become increasingly counterproductive.
This Article contends that small-group instruction provides the opportunity for superior teaching, especially for first-year law students. Recent scholarship in active learning, educational psychology, and students’ mental health demonstrates the limitations of the traditional large Socratic class experience. Building on that theoretical foundation and informed by sustained classroom experience, this Article argues that small-group pedagogy more …
Land Without Legacy: The Case For Market-Based Appraisals On Hawaiian Home Lands, Alexis C. Owens
Land Without Legacy: The Case For Market-Based Appraisals On Hawaiian Home Lands, Alexis C. Owens
Seattle University Law Review
The Hawaiian Homes Commission Act of 1920 (HHCA) was enacted to restore Native Hawaiians to ancestral lands and promote long term economic self-sufficiency. More than a century later, that promise remains unfulfilled. This Note argues that a central but overlooked barrier lies in the HHCA’s mandated use of the replacement cost appraisal method, which systematically undervalues homestead properties by excluding market forces. In one of the most expensive housing markets in the United States, this approach suppresses home equity, the primary means of intergenerational wealth building, and restricts beneficiaries’ access to credit and financial stability. By severing the connection between …
International Law’S Forgotten Refugees—Palestinian Refugees In Egypt
International Law’S Forgotten Refugees—Palestinian Refugees In Egypt
Seattle University Law Review
This Article examines the legal and humanitarian crisis facing Palestinian refugees who have fled to Egypt amidst the ongoing violence in Gaza. While escaping active conflict, these refugees face systemic barriers to employment and education, rendering their living conditions precarious and unsustainable. The unique legal status of Palestinian refugees stems from the fact that they have been excluded from the 1951 Refugee Convention and its 1967 Protocol, leaving them without any meaningful international protection. This exclusion is rooted in the political complexities of the Palestinian struggle for self-determination and reflects a fragmented legal framework that prioritizes limited humanitarian aid over …
Veiled Justice: Secularism And The Hijab Across Democracies, Mohamed ‘Arafa
Veiled Justice: Secularism And The Hijab Across Democracies, Mohamed ‘Arafa
Seattle University Law Review
For much of 2022, Iran was gripped by widespread protests led by women who openly challenged the regime’s authority, particularly its compulsory veiling laws, following the death of Mahsa Amini in police custody. Women around the globe came around and showed solidarity with the women in Iran. However, in non-Islamic countries and societies, one can still make out many prejudices and stereotyping connected to the question of whether and to what extent veiling is mandatory for women according to Shārīe’ā law. Is wearing the hijab a choice, or rather, an essential religious practice that religious Muslim women need to obey? …
Rewriting The Playbook: The X’S And O’S Of The House Settlement And The Future Of Student-Athletes’ Voice In Their Compensation, Matthew K.V. Glazer
Rewriting The Playbook: The X’S And O’S Of The House Settlement And The Future Of Student-Athletes’ Voice In Their Compensation, Matthew K.V. Glazer
Seattle University Law Review
Since the formation of the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) in the 1900s, collegiate athletes (student-athletes) have been prohibited from using their own name, image and likeness (NIL) for profit. But on July 1, 2021, the NCAA changed course and began allowing student-athletes to profit from their own NIL. In the past few years, U.S. college athletics have undergone significant changes, most notably introducing monetary compensation for student-athletes’ NIL. While these changes were long overdue and ultimately beneficial, they have significantly disrupted the landscape of college sports, giving rise to numerous challenges that some experts have compared to the “Wild …
Mr. Trump Goes To Washington Part Ii: A Review Of Richard Delgado's 2025, Kevin Johnson
Mr. Trump Goes To Washington Part Ii: A Review Of Richard Delgado's 2025, Kevin Johnson
Seattle University Law Review
Richard Delgado’s The Rodrigo Chronicles have captivated a generation of law students and legal scholars. Mapping the terrain of race, racism, and Critical Race Theory (CRT), the skillful, and long-running narrative series stands as a testament to Delgado’s dedication to justice for all.
The Rodrigo Chronicles are simply one of Delgado’s many intellectual contributions and part of an unparalleled scholarly legacy. As one of the founders of CRT, he produced a landmark body of scholarship –authoring the field's primary text, making the argument for the regulation of hate speech, forcefully challenging the Black/white binary of civil rights that long dominated …
The Supreme Court Under Threat: Early Lessons In Judicial Self-Protection, Curtis A. Bradley, Neil S. Siegel
The Supreme Court Under Threat: Early Lessons In Judicial Self-Protection, Curtis A. Bradley, Neil S. Siegel
Faculty Scholarship
This Essay explores how the U.S. Supreme Court, despite being vulnerable to defiance of its decisions and political retaliation, has developed tools of judicial self-protection to preserve its institutional authority and thus its capacity to sustain the Constitution and the rule of law. Arguing that the Court performs not only a legal role that requires interpretation of the law but also a political one that demands institutional preservation, the Essay examines how the Court has historically navigated political threats by using a range of tools—including avoidance, delay, narrow rulings, strategic dicta, and rhetorical appeals. The Essay focuses on three nineteenth-century …
Making The Party Presentation Principle Safe For Originalism, Randy E. Barnett, Lawrence B. Solum
Making The Party Presentation Principle Safe For Originalism, Randy E. Barnett, Lawrence B. Solum
Faculty Scholarship
The Supreme Court sometimes adheres to what it calls the “party presentation principle”—terminology that dates back to 2008. Although judicial articulations of the principle have been inconsistent and imprecise, the gist is the familiar notion that courts should resolve cases on the basis of the issues and reasons presented by the parties to the dispute. Conversely, questions not properly raised by the parties should be avoided by the Court. Thus, the Court has on several occasions declined to address arguments outside the scope of the questions raised by the parties in their petition for certiorari.
For originalists, the importance of …