Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Broadcast regulation (1)
- Censorship (1)
- Choreography (1)
- Communications Law (1)
- Constitution (1)
-
- Criminal Law (1)
- Evidence (1)
- FCC (1)
- Federal Communications Commission (1)
- Indecency (1)
- Information Privacy (1)
- International Law: History (1)
- KCC (1)
- Korean Communication Commission (1)
- Music (1)
- Obscenity (1)
- Privacy (1)
- Republic of Korea (1)
- Safe harbor (1)
- Science and Technology (1)
- South Korea (1)
- United States (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Legal History
Indecency Regulation Of The Fcc And Censorship Law In Republic Korea: Comparison And Contrasts, Min-Soo "Minee" Roh
Indecency Regulation Of The Fcc And Censorship Law In Republic Korea: Comparison And Contrasts, Min-Soo "Minee" Roh
Upper Level Writing Requirement Research Papers
Regulating music on radio or television is not a straightforward process, as the music is comprised of lyrics of words. On top of the lyrics, any music performance has an additional layer of choreography and dress code. If any individual elements or combined elements is obscene or indecent, the government attempts to regulate broadcasting both music and performance. This leads to regulating general speech on communications and it requires this paper to look into regulation of broadcasting in general and specific examples of music broadcasting regulation on radio and television, particularly, in the United States (“States”) and in Republic of …
Tweeting With A Purpose: Interpreting "Corrupt Persuasion" In 18 U.S.C. § 1512(B), Jessica Ochoa
Tweeting With A Purpose: Interpreting "Corrupt Persuasion" In 18 U.S.C. § 1512(B), Jessica Ochoa
American University Journal of Gender, Social Policy & the Law
No abstract provided.
Privacy And Security Across Borders, Jennifer Daskal
Privacy And Security Across Borders, Jennifer Daskal
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
Three recent initiatives -by the United States, European Union, and Australiaare opening salvos in what will likely be an ongoing and critically important debate about law enforcement access to data, the jurisdictional limits to such access, and the rules that apply. Each of these developments addresses a common set of challenges posed by the increased digitalization of information, the rising power of private companies delimiting access to that information, and the cross-border nature of investigations that involve digital evidence. And each has profound implications for privacy, security, and the possibility of meaningful democratic accountability and control. This Essay analyzes the …