Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Race (2)
- Administrative law (1)
- African American (1)
- Agencies (1)
- Antidiscrimination (1)
-
- Asian American (1)
- BNP (1)
- British National Party (1)
- CEHR (1)
- CRE (1)
- Case assignments (1)
- Chain migration (1)
- Civil Rights Movement (1)
- Civil rights (1)
- Class (1)
- Commission for Equality and Human Rights (1)
- Commission for Racial Equality (1)
- Conservative (1)
- Constitutional law (1)
- Court of the Southern District of New York (1)
- Court rules (1)
- Critical legal studies (1)
- Critical race theory (1)
- Daniels v. City of New York (1)
- Disability (1)
- Discrimination (1)
- Disparate impact (1)
- Disparate treatment (1)
- Economic inequality (1)
- Employment discrimination (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law and Race
A Comparative Analysis Of Unconscious And Institutional Discrimination In The United States And Britain, Leland Ware
A Comparative Analysis Of Unconscious And Institutional Discrimination In The United States And Britain, Leland Ware
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
The Danger Of Nonrandom Case Assignment: How The Southern District Of New York's "Related Cases" Rule Shaped Stop-And-Frisk Rulings, Katherine A. Macfarlane
The Danger Of Nonrandom Case Assignment: How The Southern District Of New York's "Related Cases" Rule Shaped Stop-And-Frisk Rulings, Katherine A. Macfarlane
Michigan Journal of Race and Law
The Southern District of New York’s local rules are clear: “[A]ll active judges . . . shall be assigned substantially an equal share of the categories of cases of the court over a period of time.” Yet for the past fourteen years, Southern District Judge Shira Scheindlin has been granted near-exclusive jurisdiction over one category of case: those involving wide-sweeping constitutional challenges to the New York Police Department’s (NYPD) stop-and-frisk policies. In 1999, Judge Scheindlin was randomly assigned Daniels v. City of New York, the first in a series of high-profile and high-impact stop-and-frisk cases. Since then, she has overseen …
Introduction To The Workplace Constitution From The New Deal To The New Right, Sophia Z. Lee
Introduction To The Workplace Constitution From The New Deal To The New Right, Sophia Z. Lee
All Faculty Scholarship
Today, most American workers do not have constitutional rights on the job. As The Workplace Constitution shows, this outcome was far from inevitable. Instead, American workers have a long history of fighting for such rights. Beginning in the 1930s, civil rights advocates sought constitutional protections against racial discrimination by employers and unions. At the same time, a conservative right-to-work movement argued that the Constitution protected workers from having to join or support unions. Those two movements, with their shared aim of extending constitutional protections to American workers, were a potentially powerful combination. But they sought to use those protections to …
Classcrits Mission Statement, Justin Desautels-Stein, Angela P. Harris, Martha Mccluskey, Athena Mutua, James Pope, Ann Tweedy
Classcrits Mission Statement, Justin Desautels-Stein, Angela P. Harris, Martha Mccluskey, Athena Mutua, James Pope, Ann Tweedy
Publications
No abstract provided.