Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Constitutional Law; Criminal Law; Criminal Reform; Criminal Justice; Criminal Justice Reform; Mental Health; Police Accountability; Community Investment; Qualified Immunity; Policing; Police Reform; Defund Police; Mental Health Crisis; State-Created Danger; Disability Rights; Black Lives Matter; Law and Society; Law and Policy (1)
- Criminal Law; Criminal Reform; Criminal Justice; Criminal Justice Reform; Civil Asset Forfeitures; New York; Community Investment; White Collar Crime; Law and Society; District Attorney (1)
- Criminal Law; Veterans Law; Veterans Rights; Problem-Solving Courts; Veterans Treatment Courts; Theraputic Justice; rehabilitation; law and society; collateral consequences; criminal record (1)
- Criminal law; probation; racial bias; risk assessment; criminal justice reform; recidivism (1)
- Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b); No-Impeachment Rule; Juror (1)
-
- Gun Law; Gun Regulation; Gun Control; Second Amendment; New York State Rifle & Pistol Association (1)
- Inc. v. Bruen; New York Penal Law; Sensitive Place Laws; Concealed Carry Improvement Act; Antonyuk v. Hochul; Sullivan Law; District of Columbia v. Heller; Concealed Carry; Training Requirements; Discriminatory Policing; Crime Enforcement; NYPD; Disproportionate Impact; Ambiguity (1)
- Racism; Racist; Peña-Rodriguez v. Colorado; Racial Bias; Evidence; Evidentiary; Racial Disparity; BIPOC; Implicit Bias; Explicit Bias; United States v. Shalout; Criminal Defendant; Jury Deliberations; Vaise v. Delaval; Mansfield Rule; McDonald v. Pless; Tanner v. United States; United States v. Reid; Mattox v. United States; Warger v. Shauers; Iowa Rule; Wright v. Illinois & Mississippi Telegraph Co.; United States v. Smith; Harden v. Hillman; State v. Berhe; United States v. Brooks; United States v. Birchette; Commonwealth v. Ralph R.; State v. Spates (1)
- Sex Work; Sex Work Decriminalization; New York City Human Rights Law; Housing Discrimination; Housing Rights; Feminism; New York Penal Law; Disparate Impact; New York City Commission on Human Rights; Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law; RPAPL 715; Policing; Undercover Policing; Vice Crimes; Morality; Background Checks; Full Decriminalization; Clean Slate Act; DH v. City of New York; Walking While Trans; NYPL 230.47; Stop Violence in the Sex Trades Act; Sex Trade Survivors Justice and Equality Act; Clean Slate Act; Fair Chance for Housing Act (1)
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law and Race
Good Intentions With Bad Consequences: Post-Bruen Gun Legislation In New York, Michal E. Folczyk
Good Intentions With Bad Consequences: Post-Bruen Gun Legislation In New York, Michal E. Folczyk
Journal of Law and Policy
In response to a changing landscape for firearm licensing, New York State adopted training requirements for handgun ownership and sensitive place laws. Prior to obtaining a handgun license, training requirements ensure that applicants will be able to safely use a firearm. Upon obtaining a firearm license, sensitive place laws limit where a licensed individual may or may not bring their firearm, as a preventative measure. A violation of a sensitive place law could not only bring revocation of one’s license to carry a firearm, but also felony charges. Although well-intentioned by New York State, unintended consequences attach. This Note explores …
Toward “The Most Freedom”: Decriminalizing Sex Work Alleviates Housing Discrimination And Housing Instability Faced By Sex Workers In New York City, Bianca B. Li
Journal of Law and Policy
While sex work has been incrementally decriminalized in New York City, statutes that criminalize some forms of sex work remain good law in New York City and generate potentially life-altering penalties for sex workers who are arrested or convicted under these laws. This leads to complications for sex workers who seek to rent apartments. The New York City Human Rights Law, the City’s anti-discrimination statute, does not offer explicit protection to sex workers against housing discrimination, and two criminal laws penalize property owners for allowing sex work to occur on or near their premises. This Note explores the shortcomings of …
What Counts As ‘Racist Enough?’: A Clearer Standard For New Trials When Jurors Demonstrate Racial Bias, Priyadarshini Das
What Counts As ‘Racist Enough?’: A Clearer Standard For New Trials When Jurors Demonstrate Racial Bias, Priyadarshini Das
Journal of Law and Policy
The no-impeachment rule, Federal Rule of Evidence 606(b), necessitates that jurors keep their deliberations secret. However, in the 2017 Supreme Court case Peña-Rodriguez v. Colorado, the Court created a racial bias exception to the no-impeachment rule. This exception allows jurors to notify the court when “one or more jurors made statements exhibiting overt racial bias that cast serious doubt on the fairness and impartiality of the jury’s deliberations and resulting verdict.” This Note argues that this standard is too narrow because it fails to consider several situations of racial bias, like implicit bias. The ineffectiveness of this exception is demonstrated …
Consider Collateral Consequences: The Inherent Hypocrisy Of Veterans Treatment Courts’ Failure To Dismiss Criminal Charges, Julia W. Williams
Consider Collateral Consequences: The Inherent Hypocrisy Of Veterans Treatment Courts’ Failure To Dismiss Criminal Charges, Julia W. Williams
Journal of Law and Policy
American veterans are often plagued by psychological and physical injuries, among other hardships, which, when unaddressed, can lead to substance abuse, criminal behavior, and suicide. As public awareness of the difficulties that American veterans face was growing, the problem-solving court movement was also gaining momentum. Largely inspired by therapeutic jurisprudence, an interdisciplinary framework that sees the law as a way to reach therapeutic outcomes, problem-solving courts seek to identify the root causes of criminal behavior and address those causes in ways that promote rehabilitation and reduce recidivism. Veterans Treatment Courts (“VTCs”) emerged when veterans advocacy intersected with the problem-solving court …
Slaying The Serpents: Why Alternative Intervention Is Necessary To Protect Those In Mental Health Crisis From The State-Created Danger “Snake Pit”, Kathleen Giunta
Slaying The Serpents: Why Alternative Intervention Is Necessary To Protect Those In Mental Health Crisis From The State-Created Danger “Snake Pit”, Kathleen Giunta
Journal of Law and Policy
The Black Lives Matter protests in 2020 and ongoing reports of police brutality around the United States sparked extensive debate over qualified immunity and the legal protections that prevent police accountability. Individuals experiencing mental health crises are especially vulnerable to police violence, since police officers lack the requisite skills and knowledge to provide effective crisis support during mental health emergencies. Although the state-created danger doctrine was created by the courts as an exception to qualified immunity, it is so rarely applied that individuals harmed or even killed by police are left without legal remedy. This Note explores qualified immunity and …
Civil Asset Forfeitures: How Prosecutors Can Facilitate Community-Based Criminal Justice Reform, Lane Waples
Civil Asset Forfeitures: How Prosecutors Can Facilitate Community-Based Criminal Justice Reform, Lane Waples
Journal of Law and Policy
Criminal justice reform is elusive in the United States. Despite evidence that the system is broken, change remains ephemeral at best. This is partially attributable to the fact that most attempts to reform the criminal legal system have occurred through the political process. However, another method of criminal justice reform is to assist communities as they address the root causes of crime. Undergirding this approach is the belief that building stronger communities contributes to less crime and reduces recidivism. After seizing $250 million via prosecutions of financial crimes in 2016, the New York County District Attorney’s Office created a “first-of-its-kind” …
Reducing Recidivism Or Misclassifying Offenders?: How Implementing Risk And Needs Assessment In The Federal Prison System Will Perpetuate Racial Bias, Rachel Dibenedetto
Reducing Recidivism Or Misclassifying Offenders?: How Implementing Risk And Needs Assessment In The Federal Prison System Will Perpetuate Racial Bias, Rachel Dibenedetto
Journal of Law and Policy
Your Honor, I understand the appeal of using this sentencing software, EVALUATE. I do. It appears to be efficient, precise, immune to emotion and lapses in logic. It seems fair and unbiased, so shouldn’t we attempt to be fair and unbiased in evaluating whether it actually works? 32, 19, 34 . . . 32% is the federal recidivism rate. 19%? 19% is the recidivism rate of defendants tried and sentenced in your court, Judge Barish. It’s one of the lowest in the Southern District. 34%? That’s the recidivism rate of EVALUATE, higher than the national average, 15 points behind you.