Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- AHRC (1)
- ASIO (1)
- Abrams v. United States (1)
- African Americans (1)
- African Liberation Committee (1)
-
- All-African Peoples Conferences (1)
- Anti-Semitism (1)
- Articles 55 and 56 of the UN Charter (1)
- Australian Human Rights Commission (1)
- Australian Law Reform Commission report on Multiculturalism and the Law (1)
- Australian Security Intelligence Organization (1)
- Australian criminal law (1)
- Barry O’Farrell (1)
- Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1)
- Coates (Ta-Nehisi) (1)
- Colonialism (1)
- Commission on Restitution of Land Rights (1)
- Commonwealth racial vilification laws (1)
- Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (1)
- Crimes Act 1900 (1)
- Cross burning (1)
- Dignitary takings (1)
- Dignity-restoration (1)
- Displaced people (1)
- Displacement (1)
- Domestic colonialism (1)
- ECAJ (1)
- Ellison (Ralph) (1)
- Ethnography (1)
- Executive Council of Australian Jewry (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law and Race
Human Rights Law And Racial Hate Speech Regulation In Australia: Reform And Replace?, Dr. Alan Berman
Human Rights Law And Racial Hate Speech Regulation In Australia: Reform And Replace?, Dr. Alan Berman
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
Sub-Saharan Africa: The Right Of Intervention In The Name Of Humanity, R. H. Payne
Sub-Saharan Africa: The Right Of Intervention In The Name Of Humanity, R. H. Payne
Georgia Journal of International & Comparative Law
No abstract provided.
On Black South Africans, Black Americans, And Black West Indians: Some Thoughts On We Want What’S Ours, Eleanor Marie Lawrence Brown
On Black South Africans, Black Americans, And Black West Indians: Some Thoughts On We Want What’S Ours, Eleanor Marie Lawrence Brown
Michigan Law Review
Most modern constitutions have eminent domain provisions that mandate just compensation for forced deprivations of land and require such deprivations to be for a public use or public purpose. The Takings Clause is a classic example of such a provision. The takings literature is essentially focused on outlining the outer boundaries within which the state can take property from an owner. But there are other takings that have been deemed “extraordinary”; in such circumstances, the state takes away property without just compensation and simultaneously makes a point about a person or a group’s standing in the community of citizens.