Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- American Indian Tribes (1)
- Antidiscrimination (1)
- Antidiscrimination Laws (1)
- Civil Jurisdiction (1)
- Civil Rights (1)
-
- Criminal Jurisdiction (1)
- Education (1)
- Education Federalism (1)
- Federal Indian Law (1)
- Federal Law (1)
- Fundamental Rights (1)
- Implicit-Divestiture Theory (1)
- Preservation (1)
- Racial Minorities (1)
- Right to Education (1)
- Rights Revolution (1)
- Tribal Governments (1)
- Tribal Sovereignty (1)
- Trilemma (1)
- U.S. Supreme Court (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law and Race
Designing The Legal Architecture To Protect Education As A Civil Right, Kimberly J. Robinson
Designing The Legal Architecture To Protect Education As A Civil Right, Kimberly J. Robinson
Indiana Law Journal
Although education has always existed at the epicenter of the battle for civil rights, federal and state law and policy fail to protect education as a civil right. This collective failure harms a wide array of our national interests, including our foundational interests in an educated democracy and a productive workforce. This Article proposes innovative reforms to both federal and state law and policy that would protect education as a civil right. It also explains why the U.S. approach to education federalism will require legal reforms by both levels of government to protect education as a civil right.
Redefining Tribal Sovereignty For The Era Of Fundamental Rights, Michael Doran
Redefining Tribal Sovereignty For The Era Of Fundamental Rights, Michael Doran
Indiana Law Journal
This Article explains a longstanding problem in federal Indian law. For two centuries, the U.S. Supreme Court has repeatedly acknowledged the retained, inherent sovereignty of American Indian tribes. But more recently, the Court has developed the implicit-divestiture theory to deny tribal governments criminal and civil jurisdiction over nonmembers, even with respect to activities on tribal lands. Legal scholars have puzzled over this move from a territorial-based definition of tribal sovereignty to a membership-based definition; they have variously explained it as the Court’s abandonment of the foundational principles of Indian law, the product of the Court’s indifference or even racist hostility …