Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Administrative law (1)
- Asbestos (1)
- Assessment & pricing (1)
- Benefit-cost analysis (1)
- CFR (1)
-
- Code of Federal Regulations (1)
- Copyright infringement (1)
- Deregulation (1)
- Economic growth (1)
- Empirical legal studies (1)
- Environmental damage (1)
- Fair use defense (1)
- Follow-on works (1)
- Google LLC v. Oracle America Inc. (1)
- Government regulation (1)
- Insurance markets (1)
- Intellectual property law & policy (1)
- Law & economics (1)
- Law and economics (1)
- Legacy liability (1)
- Legal theory (1)
- Lloyd's of London (1)
- Long-term care (1)
- Marketability (1)
- Politics (1)
- Public policy (1)
- Reconstruction and Renewal (1)
- Regulatory process (1)
- Reinsurance (1)
- Remedies (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law and Economics
The Deregulation Deception, Cary Coglianese, Natasha Sarin, Stuart Shapiro
The Deregulation Deception, Cary Coglianese, Natasha Sarin, Stuart Shapiro
All Faculty Scholarship
President Donald Trump and members of his Administration repeatedly asserted that they had delivered substantial deregulation that fueled positive trends in the U.S. economy prior to the COVID pandemic. Drawing on an original analysis of data on federal regulation from across the Trump Administration’s four years, we show that the Trump Administration actually accomplished much less by way of deregulation than it repeatedly claimed—and much less than many commentators and scholars have believed. In addition, and also contrary to the Administration’s claims, overall economic trends in the pre-pandemic Trump years tended simply to follow economic trends that began years earlier. …
Uncertainty > Risk: Lessons For Legal Thought From The Insurance Runoff Market, Tom Baker
Uncertainty > Risk: Lessons For Legal Thought From The Insurance Runoff Market, Tom Baker
All Faculty Scholarship
Insurance ideas inform legal thought: from tort law, to health law and financial services regulation, to theories of distributive justice. Within that thought, insurance is conceived as an ideal type in which insurers distribute determinable risks through contracts that fix the parties’ obligations in advance. This ideal type has normative appeal, among other reasons because it explains how tort law might achieve in practice the objectives of tort theory. This ideal type also supports a restrictive vision of liability-based regulation that opposes expansions and supports cutbacks, on the grounds that uncertainty poses an existential threat to insurance markets.
Prior work …
Propertizing Fair Use, Abraham Bell, Gideon Parchomovsky
Propertizing Fair Use, Abraham Bell, Gideon Parchomovsky
All Faculty Scholarship
In its current form, fair use doctrine provides a personal defense that applies narrowly to the specific use by the specific user. The landmark case of Google v. Oracle, currently pending before the Supreme Court, illustrates why this is problematic. Even if the Court were to rule that Google’s use of Oracle’s Java API’s was fair, the ruling would not protect the numerous parties that developed Java applications for the Android operating system; it would only shelter Google and Google’s particular use. This is not an isolated problem; the per use/per user rule cuts across fair uses of copyrighted …