Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Actuación (1)
- Administrative law (1)
- Agencies (1)
- Argentina (1)
- Charter of Rights and Freedoms (1)
-
- Chinese Political and Judicial System (1)
- Citation of Law (1)
- Contextual Approach (1)
- Corte Suprema de la República Argentina (1)
- Courts (1)
- Economic Rights (1)
- Environmental (1)
- Federal courts (1)
- Final decision (1)
- Judges (1)
- Judicial Decision Making (1)
- Jurisdiction (1)
- Jurisprudence, Government, Courts, and Constitutional Law (1)
- Justiciability (1)
- Land use (1)
- Law & Economics (1)
- Nueva Corte Suprema de la Nacion (1)
- Periodo 2003 a 2009 (1)
- Permitting (1)
- Planning (1)
- Poverty (1)
- Products liability (1)
- Property (1)
- Property, Administrative, and Natural Resources & Environmental Law (1)
- Public choice (1)
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 7 of 7
Full-Text Articles in Law and Economics
Chinese Judicial Pattern: Tradition And Reform(中国的司法模式:传统与改革), Meng Hou
Chinese Judicial Pattern: Tradition And Reform(中国的司法模式:传统与改革), Meng Hou
Hou Meng
No abstract provided.
Luces Y Sombras De La "Nueva" Corte Suprema (2003 - 2009), Horacio M. Lynch
Luces Y Sombras De La "Nueva" Corte Suprema (2003 - 2009), Horacio M. Lynch
Horacio M. LYNCH
Balance y análisis crítico de lo actuado por la NCSN desde que comenzó el cambio en su integración en 2003, hasta la fecha del informe en 2009, en las distintas dimensiones de su labor, su función de control de la constitucionalidad, como el Tribunal de última instancia de la Nación, y como cabeza del Poder Judicial, y en su preocupación por la Justicia del país. Analiza lo que hizo y lo que no hizo, se incluye un balance, propuestas y líneas de trabajo, e información.
Law Journals Of Cssci: Which One Is More Influential In Knowledge Production(Cssci法学期刊──谁更有知识影响力), Meng Hou
Law Journals Of Cssci: Which One Is More Influential In Knowledge Production(Cssci法学期刊──谁更有知识影响力), Meng Hou
Hou Meng
No abstract provided.
Does Anyone Get Stopped At The Gate? An Empirical Assessment Of The Daubert Trilogy In The States, Eric Helland, Jonathan Klick
Does Anyone Get Stopped At The Gate? An Empirical Assessment Of The Daubert Trilogy In The States, Eric Helland, Jonathan Klick
All Faculty Scholarship
The Supreme Court’s trilogy of evidence cases, Daubert, Joiner, and Kumho Tire appear to mark a significant departure in the way scientific and expert evidence is handled in federal court. By focusing on the underlying methods used to generate the experts’ conclusions, Daubert has the potential to impose a more rigorous standard on experts. Given this potential, some individuals have called for states to adopt the Daubert standards to purge “junk science” from state courts. However, there is relatively little empirical support for the notion that Daubert affects the quality of expert evidence. Using a large dataset of state court …
Justice Sutherland Reconsidered, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 639 (2009), Samuel R. Olken
Justice Sutherland Reconsidered, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 639 (2009), Samuel R. Olken
UIC Law Open Access Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Extending Charter Benefits To Canada’S Poor, A. Wayne Mackay
Extending Charter Benefits To Canada’S Poor, A. Wayne Mackay
Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press
While the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms has had a major impact on Canada’s political landscape in its first 25 years, its impact on social and economic rights has been minimal. The courts should assume a larger role in advancing the rights of the many Canadians living in poverty and despair.
Judges have traditionally regarded matters of social and economic policy as falling within the expertise of the legislative and executive branches of the state. The Charter has done little to dispel that view. The elected branches of the state must continue to play a major role, but the …
Ripe Standing Vines And The Jurisprudential Tasting Of Matured Legal Wines – And Law & Bananas: Property And Public Choice In The Permitting Process, Donald J. Kochan
Ripe Standing Vines And The Jurisprudential Tasting Of Matured Legal Wines – And Law & Bananas: Property And Public Choice In The Permitting Process, Donald J. Kochan
Donald J. Kochan
From produce to wine, we only consume things when they are ready. The courts are no different. That concept of “readiness” is how courts address cases and controversies as well. Justiciability doctrines, particularly ripeness, have a particularly important role in takings challenges to permitting decisions. The courts largely hold that a single permit denial does not give them enough information to evaluate whether the denial is in violation of law. As a result of this jurisprudential reality, regulators with discretion have an incentive to use their power to extract rents from those that need their permission. Non-justiciability of permit denials …