Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Academic law (1)
- Antiregulatory philosophy (1)
- Assumptions (1)
- Crimes against property (1)
- Economics (1)
-
- Economist (1)
- Fraud (1)
- Game theory (1)
- Journal of Corporation Law (1)
- Judicial quality (1)
- Law (1)
- Lawyer (1)
- Legal academy (1)
- Marginalist analysis (1)
- Mobility (1)
- Non-pecuniary benefits (1)
- Private information (1)
- Private law (1)
- Rational choice (1)
- Salary (1)
- Scott Baker (1)
- Yale Journal on Regulation (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law and Economics
What Do Lawyers Contribute To Law & Economics?, Robert E. Scott, George G. Triantis
What Do Lawyers Contribute To Law & Economics?, Robert E. Scott, George G. Triantis
Faculty Scholarship
The law-and-economics movement has transformed the analysis of private law in the United States and, increasingly, around the world. As the field developed from 1970 to the early 2000s, scholars have developed countless insights about the operation and effects of law and legal institutions. Throughout this period, the discipline of law-and-economics has benefited from a partnership among trained economists and academic lawyers. Yet the tools that are used derive primarily from economics and not law. A logical question thus demands attention: what role do academic lawyers play in law-and-economics scholarship? In this Essay, we offer an interpretive theory of the …
A Comment On The Relationship Between Judicial Salary And Judicial Quality, Stephen G. Marks
A Comment On The Relationship Between Judicial Salary And Judicial Quality, Stephen G. Marks
Faculty Scholarship
Professor Scott Baker was kind enough to present his empirical research on the relationship between judicial salary and judicial quality to the Law and Economics Workshop run by Professor Keith Hylton and me last fall and I am honored to be able to comment on it today. It is part of a growing body of literature in law that tries to shed light on important issues through statistical analysis. Baker's paper, even before its publication, generated a significant amount of buzz.
Thinking To Be Paid Versus Being Paid To Think, Merritt B. Fox
Thinking To Be Paid Versus Being Paid To Think, Merritt B. Fox
Faculty Scholarship
In the first chapter of The Economic Structure of Corporate Law, Frank Easterbrook and Daniel Fischel make an arresting statement:
... [P]eople who are backing their beliefs with cash are correct; they have every reason to avoid mistakes, while critics (be they academics or regulators) are rewarded for novel rather than accurate beliefs. Market professionals who estimate these things wrongly suffer directly; academics and regulators who estimate wrongly do not pay a similar penalty. Persons who wager with their own money may be wrong, but they are less likely to be wrong than are academics and regulators, who are wagering …