Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- "hard rule (1)
- "soft" rule (1)
- Conciliation (1)
- Cost-benefit analysis (1)
- Distributive justice (1)
-
- EPA (1)
- ESA (1)
- Even-Steven (1)
- Hidden taxes (1)
- Impatience (1)
- Income smoothing (1)
- Liquidity contraints (1)
- NEPA (1)
- Negotiation (1)
- OIRA (1)
- Objectivity (1)
- Overconsumption (1)
- Postmodernism (1)
- Prebate (1)
- Preemptive concession (1)
- Procrastination (1)
- Reinvention (1)
- Time discounting (1)
- Welfare costs (1)
- Welfarism (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law and Economics
Is Cap-And-Trade Fair To The Poor? Short-Sighted Households And The Timing Of Consumption Taxes, Manuel A. Utset, Brian Galle
Is Cap-And-Trade Fair To The Poor? Short-Sighted Households And The Timing Of Consumption Taxes, Manuel A. Utset, Brian Galle
Scholarly Publications
No abstract provided.
Saving Lives Through Administrative Law And Economics: A Response, Shi-Ling Hsu
Saving Lives Through Administrative Law And Economics: A Response, Shi-Ling Hsu
Scholarly Publications
No abstract provided.
A Game-Theoretic Approach To Regulatory Negotiation And A Framework For Empirical Analysis, Shi-Ling Hsu
A Game-Theoretic Approach To Regulatory Negotiation And A Framework For Empirical Analysis, Shi-Ling Hsu
Scholarly Publications
For at least two decades, federal agencies have departed from their traditional role as top-down regulators, and have engaged regulated parties in negotiations regarding matters that were previously either handed down as edict or resolved in quasi-judicial agency proceedings. It is no accident that the increase in agency use of more conciliatory negotiation-oriented strategies coincides with a steady increase in skepticism regarding the effectiveness of regulation at the federal level and demands for less federal control and more state and local control. In this setting, federal agencies have become more inclusive and less adversarial towards regulated parties and other stakeholders, …