Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Antitrust (1)
- Antitrust Law (1)
- Antitrust and Medicine (1)
- Big Pharma (1)
- COVID-19 (1)
-
- Cannabis Law (1)
- Coronavirus (1)
- Corporate (1)
- Decision-making (1)
- Domestic Violence Services and the Law (1)
- Economics (1)
- Finance (1)
- Hatch-Waxman Act (1)
- Immigration Reform (1)
- Pharmaceutical Companies (1)
- Regulations (1)
- Reverse Discrimination Claims (1)
- Reverse Payments (1)
- Security manipulation (1)
- Shareholder proposals (1)
- Systemic Racism (1)
- The Participation Principle (1)
- Zoning Laws (1)
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Law and Economics
Big Pharma, Big Problems: Covid-19 Heightens Patent-Antitrust Tension Caused By Reverse Payments, Hannah M. Lasting
Big Pharma, Big Problems: Covid-19 Heightens Patent-Antitrust Tension Caused By Reverse Payments, Hannah M. Lasting
Seattle University Law Review
In the wake of COVID-19, pharmaceutical companies rushed to produce vaccinations and continue to work on developing treatments, while the tension caused by reverse payments intensifies between patent and antitrust law. Lawmakers must address this tension, and the current pandemic should serve as a catalyst to prompt reform at the legislative level. By amending the Hatch-Waxman Act, lawmakers can ease the increasing strain between patent and antitrust policy concerns. In 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court attempted to resolve this tension in its landmark decision, F.T.C. v. Actavis, but the tension remains as lower courts struggle to produce a uniform standard …
The Alarming Legality Of Security Manipulation Through Shareholder Proposals, Artem M. Joukov, Samantha M. Caspar
The Alarming Legality Of Security Manipulation Through Shareholder Proposals, Artem M. Joukov, Samantha M. Caspar
Seattle University Law Review
Shareholder proposals attract attention from scholars in finance and economics because they present an opportunity to study both quasidemocratic decision-making at the corporate level and the impact of this decision-making on firm outcomes. These studies capture the effect of various proposals but rarely address whether regulations should allow many of them in the first place due to the possibility of stock price manipulation. Recent changes to shareholder proposal rules, adopted in September 2020, sought to address the potential for exploitation that some proposals create (but ultimately failed to do so). This Article shows the potential for apparently legal stock price …
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Table Of Contents, Seattle University Law Review
Seattle University Law Review
Table of Contents.