Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons^™

Summary Of Hsu V. County Of Clark, 123 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 60, Diane L. Welch

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

This case is an appeal from a district court order, entered on remand, dismissing an inverse condemnation action. While the current appeal was pending, the Nevada Supreme Court decided an intervening case with substantively similar facts which changed Nevada law when analyzing airspace takings.

Summary Of Sfpp, L.P. V. Dist. Ct., 123 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 56, Jared Christensen

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

Appeal for writ of prohibition to determine if a district court can retain jurisdiction over disputes from a settlement agreement between parties, after the district court previously dismissed the case with prejudice.ve-flas

Empirically Evaluating Claims About Investment Treaty Arbitration, Susan Franck

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

With the blossoming of empirical legal scholarship, there is an increased appreciation for the insights it offers issues of international importance. One area that can benefit from such inquiry is the resolution of disputes from investment treaties, which affects international relations, implicates international legality of domestic government conduct, and puts millions of taxpayer dollars at risk. While suggesting there has been a "litigation explosion", commentators make untested assertions about investment treaty disputes. Little empirical work transparently explores this area, however. As the first research that explains its methodology and results, this article is a modest attempt to evaluate claims about …

Integrating Investment Treaty Conflict And Dispute Systems Design, Susan Franck

Scholarly Articles in Law Reviews & Journals

With the debate on the renewal of the Trade Promotion Authority Act, the proper terms of investment treaties - including dispute resolution provisions - have become an issue of public scrutiny. In a so-called litigation explosion, investors resolve disputes against host governments through international arbitration mechanisms in investment treaties; and there is little evidence of reliance on other processes like mediation. This escalation has lead to a teething period where parties and non-parties have expressed divergent views as to the efficacy, efficiency and fairness of the dispute resolution process. With billions of dollars and sovereignty at stake, the dispute resolution …

Blinking On The Bench: How Judges Decide Cases, Chris Guthrie, Jeffrey J. Rachlinski

Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications

How do judges judge? Do they apply law to facts in a mechanical and deliberative way, as the formalists suggest they do, or do they rely on hunches and gut feelings, as the realists maintain? Debate has raged for decades, but researchers have offered little hard evidence in support of either model. Relying on empirical studies of judicial reasoning and decision making, we propose an entirely new model of judging that provides a more accurate explanation of judicial behavior. Our model accounts for the tendency of the human brain to make automatic, snap judgments, which are surprisingly accurate, but which …

Cep V Bell Aliant Regional Communications Llp, Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

This is a Union grievance regarding the scheduling of part-time employees and whether temporary student employees should be regarded as part-time for scheduling. The student's total annual work hours could be reduced under the Union's interpretation. The Employer does not include student employees as 'part-time' in the interpretation of the collective agreement.

Using The Unidroit Principles To Fill Gaps In The Cisg, John Y. Gotanda

Working Paper Series

The United Nations Convention on the International Sale of Goods (CISG) sets forth only a basic framework for the recovery of damages, thereby giving a court of tribunal broad authority to determine an aggrieved party’s loss based on circumstances of the particular case. Unfortunately, the lack of specificity has resulted in much litigation, and seemingly conflicting results. To remedy this problem, some have argued that the gaps in the CISG damages provisions should be filled with the UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts. In this paper, I argue that the gap-filling rules of CISG preclude the UNIDROIT Principles from being …

Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Stone), Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

The Grievor refused to work in what she considered an unsafe situation. After the Employer investigated she was ordered to return to work. Her refusal resulted in a two day suspension. The letter of suspension indicates that the Employer's decision was, in part, based on a similar suspension in her personal file, which is also being grieved. The Union claims the suspension was without just cause and wants the Employer to pay damages for what was lost as a result of the suspension and removal of all related documents in the personal file.

Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Morgan), Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

The Grievor was suspended with pay until a complaint by a co-worker could be investigated. The complaint dealt with a conversation regarding serial killers, which upset the co-worker and caused the Employer to be concerned about workplace safety. After the investigation the Grievor was placed on sick leave until she could provide medical proof that she was not a danger to her co-workers. The Union believes the Employer breached the collective agreement by imposing the suspension without just cause and, as remedy, wants the Employer to pay damages to compensate the Grievor for what was lost by the suspension, a …

Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Morgan), Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

The Grievor was suspended for inappropriate behaviour towards co-workers. The Union claims the three day suspension was without just, reasonable and sufficient cause and sought a remedy which would pay damages due to the suspension and removal of all related documents from the Grievor's personal file.

The grievance succeeds in part. Discipline was appropriate. There was nothing in the Grievor's personal record to support a three day suspension and one of the complaints warranted no discipline. The suspension is reduced to two days and the Grievor is to be compensated for losses resulting from the third day.

Re Canada Post Corp And Cupw (Morgan), Innis Christie

Innis Christie Collection

The Grievor was given a three day suspension (two waived, one served) for inappropriate behaviour and comments to both a co-worker and a supervisor. The Union claims the Employer breached the collective agreement by not following prescribed procedure and depending on hearsay evidence. As remedy the Union wanted the Employer to pay damages for what was lost due to the suspension and removal of all related documents from the Grievor's personal file.

Summary Of Leven V. Frey, 123 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 40, William Miller

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

This appeal clarifies the procedure and standard for judgment renewal, under NRS 17.214. The Nevada Supreme Court held that an individual must show timely filing of an affidavit, timely recording of the affidavit (if the judgment to be renewed was recorded), and timely service of the affidavit. Furthermore, the statutory language requires strict compliance.

Summary Of Arnold V. Kip, 123 Nev. Adv. Op. No. 41, Barbara Mcdonald

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

No abstract provided.

Summary Of Clark Cty. Sch. Dist. V. Richardson Constr., 123 Nev. Adv. Op. 39, Danielle Tarmu

Nevada Supreme Court Summaries

Appeal from judgment awarding $225,000 to Richardson Construction and order imposing sanctions upon Clark County School District (hereinafter “CCSD”).

C-Drum News, V. 1, No. 1, Fall 2007

The C-DRUM News

No abstract provided.

The Logic Of Legal Remedies And The Relative Weight Of Norms: Assessing The Public Interest In The Tort Reform Debate, Irma S. Russell

Faculty Works

This article explores the background principles of consistency and proportionality in legal rules and remedies. It identifies the relative strength of the interests of individuals and the public as the key to justifying the remedies available in different areas of law. Understanding the normative guidance of particular legal rules reveals the strength of society's judgment of the interests at stake in different remedies. For example, the principle of consistency generally means that a legal doctrine applying an objective measure of one's interest must apply a like-kind measure to all interests considered, absent some explicit and justifiable basis for different formulations. …

Consideration Of 'Contracting Culture' In Enforcing Arbitration Provisions, Amy J. Schmitz

Faculty Publications

The Federal Arbitration Act mandates strict and uniform enforcement of standardized pre-dispute arbitration provisions. This may not be proper, however, in light of the importance of context with respect to these provisions. This Article therefore seeks to remind courts of the importance of exchange context by proposing a "contracting culture" continuum for enforcing these arbitration provisions that acknowledges the impacts of these provisions in a particular communal context. "Contracting culture" encompasses economic and non-economic relational factors that impact dispute resolution agreements, but go beyond common conceptions of "culture" focused on ethnicity, nationality, or religion. It also explores beyond the primary …

A Special Publication, Richard C. Reuben

Faculty Publications

As he notes, Richard Reuben was not the first editor of this magazine. But he was surely the dominant one. He took over the position in the spring issue of 1997, and over the ensuing decade he has left an indelible mark of excellence and professionalism on the publication.

Keeping Arbitrations From Becoming Kangaroo Courts, Jeffrey W. Stempel

Nevada Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Process Purity And Innovation In Dispute Resolution: A Response To Professors Stempel, Cole, And Drahozal, Richard C. Reuben

Faculty Publications

This article uses a "process characteristics and values" approach to make the case against displacing arbitration finality with substantive judicial review. It responds to a trio of articles in a forthcoming Nevada Law Review symposium on whether and how the Federal Arbitration Act should be amended. In one article, Nevada Law Professor Jeffrey Stempel contends all arbitration awards should be subject to substantive judicial review similar to that of public trial courts. In a second article, Ohio State Professor Sarah Cole argues that substantive review should generally be permitted when the parties agree to it by contract, an issue now …

Parties' Power To Vary Standards For Review Of International Commercial Arbitration Awards, Richard E. Speidel

Nevada Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Revising The Faa To Permit Expanded Judicial Review Of Arbitration Awards, Sarah Rudolph Cole

Nevada Law Journal

No abstract provided.

If You Love Arbitration, Set It Free: How "Mandatory" Undermines "Arbitration", David S. Schwartz

Nevada Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Arbitration Law's Separability Doctrine After Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. V. Cardegna, Stephen J. Ware

Nevada Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Introduction: Dreaming About Arbitration Reform, Jean R. Sternlight

Nevada Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Dangers Of Deference To Form Arbitration Provisions, Amy J. Schmitz

Nevada Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Extending Owbpa Notice And Consent Protections To Arbitration Agreements Involving Employees And Consumers, Christopher J. Kippley, Richard A. Bales

Nevada Law Journal

No abstract provided.

In Defense Of Mandatory Binding Arbitration (If Imposed On The Company), Jean R. Sternlight

Nevada Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Codifying Manifest Disregard, Christopher R. Drahozal

Nevada Law Journal

No abstract provided.

Determining An Arbitrator's Jurisdiction: Timing And Finality In American Law, William W. Park

Nevada Law Journal

No abstract provided.