Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 4 of 4
Full-Text Articles in Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
Privatizing Justice But By How Much? Questions Gilmer Did Not Answer, Martin H. Malin
Privatizing Justice But By How Much? Questions Gilmer Did Not Answer, Martin H. Malin
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
El Impacto Del Arbitraje En Los Patrones Huelgarios De Puerto Rico, 1956-1995, César F. Rosado Marzán
El Impacto Del Arbitraje En Los Patrones Huelgarios De Puerto Rico, 1956-1995, César F. Rosado Marzán
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
On Trademarks, Domain Names, And Internal Auctions, Gideon Parchomovsky
On Trademarks, Domain Names, And Internal Auctions, Gideon Parchomovsky
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Assessing The Advocacy Of Negotiated Rulemaking: A Response To Philip Harter, Cary Coglianese
Assessing The Advocacy Of Negotiated Rulemaking: A Response To Philip Harter, Cary Coglianese
All Faculty Scholarship
For many years, advocates of negotiated rulemaking have advanced enthusiastic claims about how negotiated rulemaking would reduce litigation and shorten the rulemaking process. In an earlier study, I tested these claims systematically by assessing the effectiveness of negotiated rulemaking against existing rulemaking processes. I found that negotiated rulemaking neither saves time nor reduces litigation. Recently, Philip Harter, a longtime advocate of negotiated rulemaking, has criticized my study and asserted that negotiated rulemaking has succeeded remarkably in achieving its goals. Harter criticized the way I measured the length of the rulemaking process, claimed that I failed to appreciate differences in litigation, …