Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons™
Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Arbitration (2)
- Class action (2)
- Abuses (1)
- Access to justice (1)
- CFPB (1)
-
- Citizens United (1)
- Civil (1)
- Column (1)
- Confirmed (1)
- Conservative (1)
- Constitutional (1)
- Consumer (1)
- Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (1)
- Consumer arbitration (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Decision (1)
- Defective (1)
- Democracy (1)
- Dispute (1)
- Dodd-frank (1)
- Dominance (1)
- Electoral (1)
- Eroded (1)
- Fairness (1)
- Fouled (1)
- Garland (1)
- Influence (1)
- Injuries (1)
- Juries (1)
- Jury (1)
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Dispute Resolution and Arbitration
Newsroom: Can Court 'Restore Fundamental Liberties'? 03-23-2016, Sheldon Whitehouse, David A. Logan
Newsroom: Can Court 'Restore Fundamental Liberties'? 03-23-2016, Sheldon Whitehouse, David A. Logan
Life of the Law School (1993- )
No abstract provided.
Saturns For Rickshaws: Lessons For Consumer Arbitration And Access To Justice, Peter B. Rutledge
Saturns For Rickshaws: Lessons For Consumer Arbitration And Access To Justice, Peter B. Rutledge
Scholarly Works
Companies are increasingly requiring consumers to agree to arbitrate disputes they may have over the products or services they purchase. Pre-dispute arbitration agreements are controversial especially for consumer disputes, where, it is feared, consumers will not represent themselves and neither will lawyers come forward because of the small stakes involved in individual claims. Dean Rutledge addresses in this chapter whether consumer arbitration processes can be designed to provide greater access to justice for consumers.
Hurrah For The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau: Consumer Arbitration As A Poster Child For Regulation, Jean R. Sternlight
Hurrah For The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau: Consumer Arbitration As A Poster Child For Regulation, Jean R. Sternlight
Scholarly Works
Drawing on economic, psychological and philosophical considerations, this Essay considers whether consumers should be "free" to "agree" to contractually trade their opportunity to litigate in a class action for the opportunity to bring an arbitration claim against a company. The Essay suggests that by looking at the CFPB's regulation through these three lenses, one sees that the regulation is desirable—even a poster child—for the potential value of regulation when market forces are not sufficient to protect individual or public interests.