Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Contracts Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Vanderbilt Law Review

Collective bargaining

Articles 1 - 4 of 4

Full-Text Articles in Contracts

Discharge In The "Law" Of Arbitration, Roland P. Wilder Jr. Dec 1966

Discharge In The "Law" Of Arbitration, Roland P. Wilder Jr.

Vanderbilt Law Review

The vast majority of arbitrators will refuse to find just cause unless the discharge penalty bears some reasonable relation to the seriousness of the grievant's offense. They believe it to be their responsibility to determine whether the "punishment fits the crime" by realistically appraising the wrongful act's deleterious effects on the industrial community. If the grievant's proven offense appears to merit discipline short of discharge, the arbitrator usually will feel compelled to modify the discharge penalty in favor of some lesser degree of discipline. Since this amounts to a review of the penalty imposed by management, there is a substantial …


Contracts -- 1958 Tennessee Survey, Paul J. Hartman Oct 1958

Contracts -- 1958 Tennessee Survey, Paul J. Hartman

Vanderbilt Law Review

During the period covered by this survey article, there have not been many cases in the field of contracts. In two of the cases the only question before the court was the sufficiency of the evidence, and in both of these cases the Tennessee Court of Appeals found that there was sufficient evidence to sustain the lower court, without going into an analysis of the evidence. Thus, there is no comment that can properly be made concerning those cases. There were two other cases, however, upon which some comment can properly be made.

=================================

Contracts-Third Party Beneficiary-Right of County to …


Taft-Hartley Sections 301 And 303 Procedural Aspects, Joseph F. Dirisio, Joseph Martin Jr. Apr 1954

Taft-Hartley Sections 301 And 303 Procedural Aspects, Joseph F. Dirisio, Joseph Martin Jr.

Vanderbilt Law Review

The motives and purposes behind the binate Sections 301 and 303, no less than other sections of the Taft-Hartley Act,' are mixed and ambiguous. Foremost, however, seems the notion that Congress intended to create new federal rights, contract and tort, enforceable nationally in a federal forum. In broad terms, where the required relationship to interstate commerce exists, Section 301 permits suits by either employers or unions for violation of collective bargaining agreements; Section 303 permits those injured by certain boycotts and unlawful combinations to bring suit-- in both cases, the forum provided is the district court of the United States. …


Arbitrability Under Collective Bargaining Agreements, Clyde H. Brockett Jr., William Merlin Jun 1951

Arbitrability Under Collective Bargaining Agreements, Clyde H. Brockett Jr., William Merlin

Vanderbilt Law Review

Under many collective bargaining contracts calling for arbitration of disputes, sooner or later a question has arisen whether the arbitrator has authority and power to arbitrate a particular issue. While this is obviously an oversimplification, it is a statement of the problem of arbitrability. Involuntary arbitration of labor disputes the question of the "scope of arbitration" may arise in either of two situations: (1) in the formulation of new contracts; or (2) in the disposition of grievances under existing contracts. This Note will consider only arbitration of the latter type.