Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
- Keyword
-
- Insurance (3)
- Auto accident (2)
- Beneficiaries (2)
- Coverage (2)
- ERISA (2)
-
- Insured (2)
- Insurer (2)
- Liability (2)
- Life insurance (2)
- Motorist benefit (2)
- Policy (2)
- Policyholder (2)
- Victim (2)
- Accidents (1)
- Anti-injunction (1)
- Bad faith (1)
- Confiscation of cargo (1)
- Consumer (1)
- Cyber-business start-ups (1)
- Damages (1)
- Death benefit coverage (1)
- Disability (1)
- Dotcom litigation (1)
- E-sign legislation (1)
- Emotional injury (1)
- Employee (1)
- Employer-provided healthcare (1)
- Fiduciary (1)
- HMO (1)
- Healthcare (1)
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Contracts
Trade Secrets, Non-Competes, And Unfair Competition, Office Of Continuing Legal Education At The University Of Kentucky College Of Law
Trade Secrets, Non-Competes, And Unfair Competition, Office Of Continuing Legal Education At The University Of Kentucky College Of Law
Continuing Legal Education Materials
Materials from the conference on Trade Secrets, Non-Competes, and Unfair Competition held by UK/CLE in October 2001.
3rd Annual Computer & Technology Law Institute, Office Of Continuing Legal Education At The University Of Kentucky College Of Law
3rd Annual Computer & Technology Law Institute, Office Of Continuing Legal Education At The University Of Kentucky College Of Law
Continuing Legal Education Materials
Materials from the 3rd Annual Computer & Technology Law Institute held by UK/CLE in March 2001.
Recent Case Developments, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Recent Case Developments, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Scholarly Works
Recent case developments in Insurance Law in the years 2000 and 2001.
Recent Case Developments, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Recent Case Developments, Jeffrey W. Stempel
Scholarly Works
Recent case developments in Insurance Law in the years 2000 and 2001.
Doctors, Hmos, Erisa, And The Public Interest After Pegram V. Herdrich, Jeffrey W. Stempel, Nadia Von Magdenko
Doctors, Hmos, Erisa, And The Public Interest After Pegram V. Herdrich, Jeffrey W. Stempel, Nadia Von Magdenko
Scholarly Works
The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 was enacted in the wake of highly publicized pension disasters in order to protect employee pension rights. Born as a piece of pro-worker legislation, it initially was criticized by business groups as a cause of bureaucratic arteriosclerosis that was worse than the disease of pension failures. Even worse, it prompted many employers to consider dispensing with pension plans altogether rather than struggle with the administrative and financial obligations of ERISA. Business, labor, and the public all complained about the law's complexity. It even became something of a national joke as regulators took …