Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Keyword
-
- Accrued dividend (1)
- Adverse interest (1)
- Compulsory liquidation (1)
- Corporations law (1)
- Counter-performance (1)
-
- Derivative action (1)
- Direct action (1)
- Dissident shareholder (1)
- Doctrine of frustration (1)
- Executive compensation (1)
- Executory (1)
- Freeze-out (1)
- Frustration of purpose (1)
- Gap-filling (1)
- Gottlieb v. Heyden Chemical Corporation (1)
- Hardship (1)
- Implied condition (1)
- Impossibility (1)
- Impracticability (1)
- Inherent power of equity (1)
- Krell v. Henry (1)
- Lebold v. Inland Steel Co. (1)
- Prohibitory injunction (1)
- Relief (1)
- Rescission (1)
- Stockholder vote (1)
- Wind up (1)
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Contracts
Contracts-Frustration Of Purpose, T. Ward Chapman S.Ed.
Contracts-Frustration Of Purpose, T. Ward Chapman S.Ed.
Michigan Law Review
The purpose of this comment is to discuss the doctrine in terms of its treatment by American courts. Attention will be given to the limitations which the courts have placed upon the doctrine, the degree to which they accept the doctrine thus limited, the rationales urged for the doctrine's acceptance or rejection, and the forms in which relief is given in frustration situations.
Stockholder Votes Motivated By Adverse Interest: The Attack And The Defense, Earl Sneed
Stockholder Votes Motivated By Adverse Interest: The Attack And The Defense, Earl Sneed
Michigan Law Review
It is the purpose of this article to study stockholder votes motivated by adverse interest from the standpoint of the attack and the defense. First, the remedies available to the complaining minority are examined. Then follows a study of the indicia of adverse interest in specific shareholder actions. Knowledge of the nature and import of these indicia should enable the careful lawyer to avoid or defeat the charge that unconscionable adverse interest vitiated the result of a stockholder vote.