Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Contracts Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Insurance Law

University of Michigan Law School

Contest

Publication Year

Articles 1 - 2 of 2

Full-Text Articles in Contracts

Insurance-Effect Of Incontestable Clause In Suit For Reformation Of Policy, N. S. Peterman S. Ed. May 1949

Insurance-Effect Of Incontestable Clause In Suit For Reformation Of Policy, N. S. Peterman S. Ed.

Michigan Law Review

For over twenty years, defendant insurer accepted premiums on a life insurance policy issued to plaintiff. Defendant then discovered that a clerical error had been made in the original policy, as a result of which plaintiff's premium payments were approximately one-half the premiums defendant normally received for the type of policy actually issued. Defendant asked for reformation of the policy on the ground of mistake, and the trial court granted the relief sought. On appeal, held, reversed. The action was barred by the incontestable clause. Richardson v. Travelers Insurance Co., (App. 9th, 1948) 171 F. (2d) 699.


Insurance-Incontestability Clause-Fraud In Connection With Reinstatement, T. M. Kubiniec Oct 1945

Insurance-Incontestability Clause-Fraud In Connection With Reinstatement, T. M. Kubiniec

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff sued for disability benefits under a life insurance policy providing that it should be incontestable from its date and that insured's statements, in the absence of fraud, should be deemed representations and would not avoid the policy unless contained in a written application, a copy of which was attached to the policy when issued. Defendant sought to rescind the contract on the ground that a reinstatement granted some eighteen months before had been induced by fraudulent statements. Held, the reinstatement may be contested only within the time after reinstatement fixed for contesting the policy, and that fraud is …