Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Civil Procedure (12)
- Comparative and Foreign Law (5)
- Courts (5)
- Criminal Law (4)
- Torts (3)
-
- Banking and Finance Law (2)
- Bankruptcy Law (2)
- Business Organizations Law (2)
- Common Law (2)
- Evidence (2)
- Intellectual Property Law (2)
- Jurisprudence (2)
- Legislation (2)
- Admiralty (1)
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (1)
- Conflict of Laws (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Education Law (1)
- European Law (1)
- Family Law (1)
- First Amendment (1)
- Health Law and Policy (1)
- Human Rights Law (1)
- Indigenous, Indian, and Aboriginal Law (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Law and Politics (1)
- Law and Psychology (1)
- Institution
-
- Louisiana State University Law Center (17)
- Fordham Law School (13)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (4)
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- University of Richmond (3)
-
- University of Malaya (2)
- Yeshiva University, Cardozo School of Law (2)
- Boston University School of Law (1)
- Brooklyn Law School (1)
- Florida International University College of Law (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Kennesaw State University (1)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (1)
- Notre Dame Law School (1)
- Osgoode Hall Law School of York University (1)
- Saint Louis University School of Law (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- Seattle University School of Law (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- UIC School of Law (1)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (1)
- University of Georgia School of Law (1)
- University of Miami Law School (1)
- University of Missouri School of Law (1)
- University of Montana (1)
- Western New England University (1)
- William & Mary Law School (1)
- Keyword
-
- Civil litigation (8)
- Access to justice (6)
- Civil law (3)
- Mediation (3)
- Punitive damages (3)
-
- Alternative dispute resolution (2)
- Civil procedure (2)
- Constitutional law (2)
- Legal needs studies (2)
- Tort (2)
- ADR (1)
- Adjudication (1)
- Administrator (1)
- After All (1)
- Alimony (1)
- Alternative Forum Non Conveniens Analysis (1)
- Apologies (1)
- Appeal (1)
- Article III (1)
- Bifurcation (1)
- Brown vs. Board of Education (1)
- CEO (1)
- Case-or-controversy (1)
- Censorship (1)
- Civil (1)
- Civil Judiciary (1)
- Civil Justice (1)
- Civil Procedure Code (1)
- Civil RICO liability (1)
- Civil justice (1)
- Publication
-
- Journal of Civil Law Studies (13)
- Fordham Urban Law Journal (11)
- Faculty Scholarship (5)
- The Center of Civil Law Studies Newsletter (4)
- Faculty Publications (3)
-
- Indiana Law Journal (3)
- Cardozo Law Review (2)
- Scholarly Works (2)
- Student Works (2010-2019) (2)
- University of Richmond Law Review (2)
- Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law (2)
- All Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Articles (1)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (1)
- Blackfeet Tribe (1)
- Editorials and Commentaries (1)
- Faculty Articles (1)
- Georgetown Law Faculty Publications and Other Works (1)
- Journal Articles (1)
- Public Interest Law Reporter (1)
- Richmond Journal of Global Law & Business (1)
- Seattle Journal for Social Justice (1)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (1)
- UIC Law Review (1)
- Vanderbilt Law Review (1)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (1)
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 64
Full-Text Articles in Civil Law
Brief Remarks On Intersocietal Responsibility And Canada’S Honour In The Case Of Angelica Choc V. Hudbay Minerals Inc., Craig Scott
Editorials and Commentaries
"These remarks were presented in Toronto on December 1, 2010, at a press conference convened by the Toronto law firm of Klippensteins, who represent Angelica Choc, the widow of Adolfo Ich Chamán."
An Unsettling Outcome: Why The Florida Supreme Court Was Wrong To Ban All Settlement Evidence In Saleeby V Rocky Elson Construction, Inc., 3 So. 3d 1078 (Fla. 2009), Michael L. Seigel, Robert J. Hauser, Allison D. Sirica
An Unsettling Outcome: Why The Florida Supreme Court Was Wrong To Ban All Settlement Evidence In Saleeby V Rocky Elson Construction, Inc., 3 So. 3d 1078 (Fla. 2009), Michael L. Seigel, Robert J. Hauser, Allison D. Sirica
UF Law Faculty Publications
It is rare that a court as sophisticated as the Florida Supreme Court casually makes a fundamental mistake in an important area of the law. Unfortunately, Saleeby v. Rocky Elson Construction, Inc., 3 So. 3d 1078 (Fla. 2009) represents one of these unusual instances. The Court was faced with a simple question: may evidence pertaining to a prior settlement be offered at trial when it is relevant to something other than liability or the invalidity or amount of the pending claim. The universal answer under both federal law and the law of other states is yes, as long as …
Introduction: Civil Legal Representation, Lisa E. Brodoff
Introduction: Civil Legal Representation, Lisa E. Brodoff
Seattle Journal for Social Justice
No abstract provided.
No.17 - November 2010, Center Of Civil Law Studies
No.17 - November 2010, Center Of Civil Law Studies
The Center of Civil Law Studies Newsletter
No abstract provided.
Bifurcation Of Civil Trials, John P. Rowley Iii, Richard G. Moore
Bifurcation Of Civil Trials, John P. Rowley Iii, Richard G. Moore
University of Richmond Law Review
Despite its widespread and long-standing recognition as a valuable docket-control device, the bifurcation of issues in civil trials has generated considerable debate among legal scholars and judges. The state and federal courts both utilize bifurcation, andthe Supreme Court of Appeals in Virginia recognized the advantages of the procedural device as early as 1915. Nonetheless, authority for the bifurcation of issues in civil trials in Virginia has remained clouded. The Supreme Court of Virginia lifted at least some of the clouds when it decided Allstate Insurance Co. v. Wade, thereby rejecting the position taken in an amicus curiae brief filed …
Civil Practice And Procedure, John R. Walk, Andrew P. Sherrod
Civil Practice And Procedure, John R. Walk, Andrew P. Sherrod
University of Richmond Law Review
This article surveys recent significant developments in Virginia civil practice and procedure. Specifically, the article discusses opinions of the Supreme Court of Virginia from June 2009 through April 2010 addressing civil procedure; significant amendments to the Rules of the Supreme Court of Virginia made during the same period; and legislation enacted by the Virginia GeneralAssembly during its 2010 session relating to civil practice.
Civil Judicial Subsidy, Brendan S. Maher
Presidential Leadership And Civil Rights Lawyering In The Era Before Brown, Lynda G. Dodd
Presidential Leadership And Civil Rights Lawyering In The Era Before Brown, Lynda G. Dodd
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
No.16 - October 2010, Center Of Civil Law Studies
No.16 - October 2010, Center Of Civil Law Studies
The Center of Civil Law Studies Newsletter
No abstract provided.
What Is Civil Justice, Jason M. Solomon
What Is Civil Justice, Jason M. Solomon
Faculty Publications
This Article first explores the meaning of the term “civil justice” as it is used in both academic and popular discourse. It then examines the idea of civil justice by looking at three key examples: (1) the U.S. tort system (specifically governing auto accidents); (2) the no-fault regimes of New Zealand, U.S. workers’ compensation, and the 9/11 Victim Compensation Fund; and (3) the phenomenon of apologies, instead of compensation, as remedies in medical malpractice cases. The Article concludes that an important component of civil justice is the ability of a person to hold accountable one who has wronged her.
Sanhuri's Civil Code For Arab Countries And Its Relevance To Modern And Islamic Laws., Najm Aldeen K. Kareem
Sanhuri's Civil Code For Arab Countries And Its Relevance To Modern And Islamic Laws., Najm Aldeen K. Kareem
Student Works (2010-2019)
This study aims to examine the development of the Arab society and the changes that shaped it in the era of modernity. A special focus, however, is given to Sanhūrī’s Codes for Arab civil laws in the middle of the Twentieth Century. The type of methodology adopted for this research is historical and analytical. It follows a historical method to explore the situation of Islamic law in the Arab countries before the enactment of Sanhūrī’s Codes, with special reference to attempts that have been made to codify the law from the early Islamic age until the time of Sanhūrī and …
When Is An Alternative Forum Available - Rethinking The Forum Non Conveniens Analysis, Joel H. Samuels
When Is An Alternative Forum Available - Rethinking The Forum Non Conveniens Analysis, Joel H. Samuels
Articles
No abstract provided.
When Is An Alternative Forum Available? Rethinking The Forum Non Conveniens Analysis, Joel H. Samuels
When Is An Alternative Forum Available? Rethinking The Forum Non Conveniens Analysis, Joel H. Samuels
Indiana Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Best Practices For Mediation Training And Regulation: Preliminary Findings, Susan S. Raines, Tim Hedeen, Ansley B. Barton
Best Practices For Mediation Training And Regulation: Preliminary Findings, Susan S. Raines, Tim Hedeen, Ansley B. Barton
Faculty Articles
This article makes recommendations as to “Best Practices” for the training of mediators in court-connected settings. The authors’ findings cover issues including the design of training programs, the importance of experiential learning through role-plays, teaching methods for adult learners, class size and length, training ethical mediators, suggested trainer qualifications, and recommended regulatory practices for administrators. Data comes primarily from an assessment of mediation training and regulation in Florida, but the findings hold insights for court-connected mediation programs throughout the United States. Additionally, the authors highlight the benefits of a collaborative assessment approach involving all stakeholder groups and facilitating smooth implementation …
Cy Pres Relief And The Pathologies Of The Modern Class Action: A Normative And Empirical Analysis, Martin H. Redish, Peter Julian, Samantha Zyontz
Cy Pres Relief And The Pathologies Of The Modern Class Action: A Normative And Empirical Analysis, Martin H. Redish, Peter Julian, Samantha Zyontz
Faculty Scholarship
Since the mid 1970s, federal courts have taken the doctrine of cy pres relief from the venerable law of trusts and adapted it for use in the modern class action proceeding. In its original context, cy pres was utilized as a means of judicially designating a charitable recipient when, for whatever reason, it was no longer possible to fulfill the original goal of the maker of the trust. The purpose of cy pres was to provide “the next best relief” by finding a recipient who would resemble the original donor’s recipient as much as possible. In the context of class …
After Buffalo V. Burd, 2010-Ap-06 (Blkft. Tr. Ct. App., Jun. 15, 2010), Blackfeet Appellate Court
After Buffalo V. Burd, 2010-Ap-06 (Blkft. Tr. Ct. App., Jun. 15, 2010), Blackfeet Appellate Court
Blackfeet Tribe
In the Blackfeet Tribal Court of Appeals, the Court overturned the lower court’s reward of alimony, finding that Blackfeet Tribal Code does not have a law regarding alimony. The Court also dismissed a restraining order because there was nothing in the pleading to substantiate the need for a restraining order and the lower court did not hold a hearing regarding it.
No.15 - June 2010, Center Of Civil Law Studies
No.15 - June 2010, Center Of Civil Law Studies
The Center of Civil Law Studies Newsletter
No abstract provided.
The Plaintiff Neutrality Principle: Pleading Complex Litigation In The Era Of Twombly And Iqbal, Robin J. Effron
The Plaintiff Neutrality Principle: Pleading Complex Litigation In The Era Of Twombly And Iqbal, Robin J. Effron
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Cleaning Up Punitive Damages: A Statutory Solution For Unguided Punitive-Damages Awards In Maritime Cases, Richard A. Chastain
Cleaning Up Punitive Damages: A Statutory Solution For Unguided Punitive-Damages Awards In Maritime Cases, Richard A. Chastain
Vanderbilt Law Review
Intentionally destroying property-boundary markers by sawing down the posts.' Causing environmental disasters. Fraudulently refusing to settle insurance claims within coverage limits. Bad-faith dealing in big oil contracts. Hiding mild weather damage to new vehicles. Creating and marketing cigarettes while knowing about their carcinogenic risks. Contributing to automobile accidents. No, these are not items on some nefarious villain's to-do list. These are all examples of cases where courts have awarded punitive damages against the tortfeasors on top of their compensatory liability. While each tort is unquestionably wrong, some certainly appear more wrong than others.
In recent years, punitive damages have become …
No.14 - March 2010, Center Of Civil Law Studies
No.14 - March 2010, Center Of Civil Law Studies
The Center of Civil Law Studies Newsletter
No abstract provided.
Autoptic Film, Alex Murray
Civil Rights And Federal Courts: Creating A Two-Course Sequence, Howard M. Wasserman
Civil Rights And Federal Courts: Creating A Two-Course Sequence, Howard M. Wasserman
Faculty Publications
No abstract provided.
The Need For A National Civil Justice Survey Of Incidence And Claiming Behavior, Theodore Eisenberg
The Need For A National Civil Justice Survey Of Incidence And Claiming Behavior, Theodore Eisenberg
Fordham Urban Law Journal
Civil justice issues – family law issues such as divorce and child custody, consumer victimization issues raised by questionable trade practices, and tort issues raised by surprisingly high estimated rates of medical malpractice, questionable prescription drug practices, and other behaviors – are part of the fabric of daily life. Yet we lack systematic quantitative knowledge about the primary events in daily life that generate civil justice issues. This paper explores the desirability of, and issues related to, creating a national civil justice survey (NCJS) analogous to the National Crime Victimization Survey. The need for information about civil justice issues and …
Connecting Self-Representation To Civil Gideon: What Existing Data Reveal About When Counsel Is Most Needed, Russell Engler
Connecting Self-Representation To Civil Gideon: What Existing Data Reveal About When Counsel Is Most Needed, Russell Engler
Fordham Urban Law Journal
Over the past decade, the phenomenon of self-representation in civil cases has led to the development of programs designed to facilitate self-representation. A revitalized movement seeking to establish a civil right to counsel has emerged (civil Gideon, a civil right to counsel based on Gideon v. Wainwright), pressing for the expansion of the availability of counsel for the poor. What are the scenarios in which full representation by counsel is most needed? Part of this question involves policy choices as to the importance of what is at stake in the proceeding. Part of this question, however, is a research question: …
Higher Demand, Lower Supply? A Comparative Assessment Of The Legal Resource Landscape For Ordinary Americans, Gillian K. Hadfield
Higher Demand, Lower Supply? A Comparative Assessment Of The Legal Resource Landscape For Ordinary Americans, Gillian K. Hadfield
Fordham Urban Law Journal
Systematic efforts to assess the legal landscape for the ordinary citizen - what legal services cost and what fraction of that cost is for real value - have been few and far between. Most studies focus instead on the performance of the legal system for corporate clients or on the delivery of legal services to the poor as a form of charity or welfare assistance. This article reviews and compares the few existing legal needs studies and looks for the macro indicators of the extent to which resources across the economy as a whole are devoted to providing legal inputs …
If We Don't Get Civil Gideon: Trying To Make The Best Of The Civil-Justice Market, Thomas D. Rowe Jr.
If We Don't Get Civil Gideon: Trying To Make The Best Of The Civil-Justice Market, Thomas D. Rowe Jr.
Fordham Urban Law Journal
This article considers what market-oriented or market-regulation approaches might be most practical and helpful in trying to satisfy unmet civil legal-service needs and how much it appears that such approaches may be able to succeed in doing so.
Lawyerless Dispute Resolution: Rethinking A Paradigm, Jean R. Sternlight
Lawyerless Dispute Resolution: Rethinking A Paradigm, Jean R. Sternlight
Fordham Urban Law Journal
This Article suggests that our failure to focus on the possible need for representation in mediation and arbitration is fundamentally misguided. Although legal representation is no doubt more important in some contexts than others, it is wrong to make the binary assumption that legal representation is always more important in litigation than in ADR processes; legal representation may often be critically important in ADR processes. Because many disputes will be finally resolved in ADR and because legal representation can be equally or even more important in ADR than in litigation, we need to focus simultaneously on improving representation in both …
Forgotten Namesake: The Illinois Good Samaritan Act's Inexcusable Failure To Provide Immunity To Non-Medical Rescuers, 43 J. Marshall L. Rev. 1097 (2010), David Weldon
UIC Law Review
No abstract provided.
It Takes Two To Tango, And To Mediate: Legal Cultural And Other Factors Influencing United States And Latin American Lawyers’ Resistance To Mediating Commercial Disputes, Don Peters
Richmond Journal of Global Law & Business
This article examines legal cultural and other factors influencing the resistance to mediating commercial disputes displayed by U.S. and Latin American lawyers. After surveying current contexts in which commercial mediation occurs in the United States and in Latin American countries and summarizing data regarding commercial ac- tors’ knowledge of the benefits of mediating, it analyzes the relatively infrequent use of mediation despite its potential advantages over adju- dicating. Focusing on lawyers, the article next explores factors that influence U.S. and Latin American lawyers when they converse with commercial clients about selecting dispute resolution methods. Analyzing similarities arising from universal decision-making …
Lawyering In Juvenile Court: Lessons From A Civil Gideon Experiment, Katherine Hunt Federle
Lawyering In Juvenile Court: Lessons From A Civil Gideon Experiment, Katherine Hunt Federle
Fordham Urban Law Journal
To understand how a good lawyering paradigm may nevertheless undermine client empowerment and perpetuate disability, it is necessary to appreciate the larger ethical debate about client autonomy. This Article will examine two dominant models of good lawyering and explore their implications for client choice and lawyer autonomy, with an emphasis on poverty lawyering. The Article then turns to a discussion of the lawyering experience in juvenile court to illustrate the ways in which dominant visions of the client as dependent, incompetent, and disabled affect not only the role and responsibilities of the attorney for the child but the extension of …