Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Institution
-
- BLR (5)
- Selected Works (4)
- University of Georgia School of Law (3)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (2)
- The Catholic University of America, Columbus School of Law (2)
-
- American University Washington College of Law (1)
- Santa Clara Law (1)
- Southern Methodist University (1)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (1)
- University of Kentucky (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of New Hampshire (1)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (1)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (1)
- William & Mary Law School (1)
- Publication
-
- ExpressO (5)
- All Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Scholarly Works (3)
- Scholarly Articles (2)
- Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals (1)
-
- Christopher J Robinette (1)
- Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters (1)
- Faculty Publications (1)
- Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Jean M. Eggen (1)
- LLM Theses and Essays (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarly Articles (1)
- Nancy C Marcus (1)
- Randy Lee (1)
- The University of New Hampshire Law Review (1)
- Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications (1)
- William & Mary Law Review (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1 - 26 of 26
Full-Text Articles in Law
Judging Plaintiffs, Jason M. Solomon
Judging Plaintiffs, Jason M. Solomon
Scholarly Works
With its powerful account of the normative principles embodied in the structure and practice of the law of torts, corrective justice is considered the leading moral theory of tort law. It has a significant advantage over instrumental and other moral theories in that it is more consistent with what judges say when they analyze tort law concepts. And with criticism of instrumental accounts, like law and economics, on a number of fronts, it is the leading descriptive theory of tort law.
In this Article, I take up a question that has never been answered adequately by corrective-justice or other moral …
The Battle Over Implied Preemption: Products Liability And The Fda, Mary J. Davis
The Battle Over Implied Preemption: Products Liability And The Fda, Mary J. Davis
Law Faculty Scholarly Articles
A mere five years ago, the Food and Drug Administration (the "FDA") began, for the first time in its 100-year history, to take the position that its prescription drug labeling regulations defeated the ability of injured plaintiffs to pursue common law tort claims based on the adequacy of the labeling. This position, radical to many and rational to others, places federal preemption of prescription drug labeling actions directly in the center of the debate over the proper roles of federal regulation and state tort laws in promoting product safety. The U.S. Supreme Court has contributed to this debate with several …
The Principles Of Product Liability, In Symposium, Products Liability: Litigation Trends On The 10th Anniversary Of The Third Restatement, Richard W. Wright
The Principles Of Product Liability, In Symposium, Products Liability: Litigation Trends On The 10th Anniversary Of The Third Restatement, Richard W. Wright
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Palsgraf Revisited (Again), Joseph W. Little
Palsgraf Revisited (Again), Joseph W. Little
The University of New Hampshire Law Review
[Excerpt] “A funny thing happened at the 2005 meeting of the American Law Institute in Philadelphia. With hardly a thought as to the profundity—and probable futility—of its act, the assemblage bulldozed one of the enduring nuggets of common law wisdom to the pile of discarded relics of legal history.
Apart from those in personal injury work, most lawyers won’t remember too many specifics about their first year law school torts courses. But if I had to bet on a single common law judicial opinion that is likely to stimulate a flicker of recognition in many memories—by specifying common law, I …
Punitive Damages And The Tobacco Industry: New Guidelines From The U. S. Supreme Court, Jean M. Eggen
Punitive Damages And The Tobacco Industry: New Guidelines From The U. S. Supreme Court, Jean M. Eggen
Jean M. Eggen
No abstract provided.
Introductory Remarks: Explaining Tort Law, Michael S. Green
Introductory Remarks: Explaining Tort Law, Michael S. Green
William & Mary Law Review
No abstract provided.
News Media’S Impact On Perceptions Of The Civil Justice System, Hugh M. Robert
News Media’S Impact On Perceptions Of The Civil Justice System, Hugh M. Robert
ExpressO
With cases in the news like the McDonalds case, it has left the public with a very distorted view of the civil justice system. Information about the civil litigation system is critical because citizens report that the news media is their primary source of information about the court system, an even more important source than contact with the courts themselves. With the general public relying primarily on the news media as their source of information, it is necessary to examine what is being reported and the frequency of covering both sides to the story, the true story.
The Price-Anderson Public Liability Action And Strict Liability, Donald E. Jose, Michael A. Garza
The Price-Anderson Public Liability Action And Strict Liability, Donald E. Jose, Michael A. Garza
ExpressO
Nuclear Power and nuclear weapons plants seem to be an ultrahazardous activity for which strict liability should apply. However, unusual provisions of the Price-Anderson Act serve to shield nuclear power and nuclear weapons plants and associated activities from strict liability unless the federaq agency regulating the activity determins that a special from of strict liability can be applied.
Cold Comfort Pharmacy: Pharmacist Tort Liability For Conscientious Refusals To Dispense Emergency Contraception, Kristen Marttila Gast
Cold Comfort Pharmacy: Pharmacist Tort Liability For Conscientious Refusals To Dispense Emergency Contraception, Kristen Marttila Gast
ExpressO
The past several years have seen an increasing number of pharmacists refuse to dispense emergency contraception, an effective, post-coital form of contraception, on the grounds that the drug violates their personal beliefs. This Article addresses the impact of those pharmacist refusals under existing principles of tort law. The Article draws on existing pharmacy case law, state-specific refusal clauses, and ethics statements promulgated by professional pharmacy associations to investigate whether pharmacists have a legal duty to dispense emergency contraception, notwithstanding religious or ethical objections. Concluding that in most states, such a legal duty does exist, the Article develops a “wrongful conception” …
Are All ‘Legal Dollars’ Created Equal?, Doron Teichman, Yuval Feldman
Are All ‘Legal Dollars’ Created Equal?, Doron Teichman, Yuval Feldman
ExpressO
For several decades law and economic scholars have employed the tools of price theory in order to evaluate an array of legal questions ranging from criminal sanctions to contract remedies. This vast body of literature implicitly assumed that all payments made through the legal system are fungible. In other words, just as a dollar paid for a tomato is identical to a dollar paid for a cucumber, so are a dollar paid as a pollution tax to the government and a dollar paid as compensation to the party injured by the pollution. In this study we challenge this assumption, and …
Cyber-Extortion: Duties And Liabilities Related To The Elephant In The Server Room, Adam J. Sulkowski
Cyber-Extortion: Duties And Liabilities Related To The Elephant In The Server Room, Adam J. Sulkowski
ExpressO
This is a comprehensive analysis of the legal frameworks related to cyber-extortion – the practice of demanding money in exchange for not carrying out threats to commit harm that would involve a victim's information systems. The author hopes it will catalyze an urgently needed discussion of relevant public policy concerns.
Cyber-extortion has, by all accounts, become a common, professionalized and profit-driven criminal pursuit targeting businesses. 17% of businesses in a recent survey indicated having received a cyber-extortion demand. An additional 13% of respondents were not sure if their business had received such a demand.
Awareness of the risks of cybercrime …
Taxing Emotional Distress Recoveries: Does Murphy Show The Way?, Kaushal P. Mahaseth
Taxing Emotional Distress Recoveries: Does Murphy Show The Way?, Kaushal P. Mahaseth
LLM Theses and Essays
The taxability of recoveries of damages on account of emotional distress remains a complicated issue under the American federal income tax law. Recent developments due to a controversial decision by the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals have further added fuel to this debate. Even if one were to argue the justifications of exempting such recoveries from income taxation, courts do not appear to be the very appropriate kind of forum. Congress can, and in fact does tax such recoveries and the constitutional basis of such power can hardly be doubted. As a result, appropriate changes in the statute only can …
Acts And Omissions As Positive And Negative Causes, Richard W. Wright
Acts And Omissions As Positive And Negative Causes, Richard W. Wright
All Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Reservoirs Of Danger: The Evolution Of Public And Private Law At The Dawn Of The Information Age, Danielle Keats Citron
Reservoirs Of Danger: The Evolution Of Public And Private Law At The Dawn Of The Information Age, Danielle Keats Citron
Faculty Scholarship
A defining problem at the dawn of the Information Age will be securing computer databases of ultra-sensitive personal information. These reservoirs of data fuel our Internet economy but endanger individuals when their information escapes into the hands of cyber-criminals. This juxtaposition of opportunities for rapid economic growth and novel dangers recalls similar challenges society and law faced at the outset of the Industrial Age. Then, reservoirs collected water to power textile mills: the water was harmless in repose but wrought havoc when it escaped. After initially resisting Rylands v. Fletcher’s strict liability standard as undermining economic development, American courts …
Why Torts Die, Kyle Graham
Why Torts Die, Kyle Graham
Faculty Publications
A few authors have performed autopsies on specific torts and identified the suspected reasons behind their deaths. These analyses, though interesting, are by their own admission of limited scope and do not provide especially useful analytic or predictive tools. This Article has a broader goal. Just as pathologists and epidemiologists study how fatal illnesses spread, conservation biologists examine why animal species go extinct, and geographers and anthropologists try to understand why societies succeed or fail, this Article surveys the roster of dead and dying torts and then asks (and tries to answer) a novel question: Why do torts die? This …
Negligence In The Air: The Duty Of Care In Climate Change Litigation, David Hunter, James Salzman
Negligence In The Air: The Duty Of Care In Climate Change Litigation, David Hunter, James Salzman
Articles in Law Reviews & Other Academic Journals
No abstract provided.
What Are We Comparing In Comparative Negligence?, Paul H. Edelman
What Are We Comparing In Comparative Negligence?, Paul H. Edelman
Vanderbilt Law School Faculty Publications
In tort cases, comparative negligence now is the dominant method for determining damages. Under that method, the jury apportions fault among the parties and assesses damages in proportion to the relative fault assessment. Comparative negligence contrasts with contributory negligence, where any fault attributed to the plaintiff bars recovery. Although comparative negligence routinely governs in tort cases, its most basic feature remains uncertain: how to apportion fault. In this Article, I demonstrate that at least two different methods exist, and that these methods lead to radically different outcomes. I create a framework, building on a traditional model from law and economics, …
Beyond Compensation: Using Torts To Promote Public Health, Elizabeth Weeks Leonard
Beyond Compensation: Using Torts To Promote Public Health, Elizabeth Weeks Leonard
Scholarly Works
Personal injury litigation, or tort law, traditionally, has been viewed as antithetical to the goals of public health. The focus on individual compensation for injuries resulting from accidents, products, and international wrongdoing arguably does not serve the "greater good" or communitarian objectives of public health. This Article, originally presented on a January 2006 AALS Panel on Teaching Public Health In Law School, takes issue with the traditional view and will demonstrate ways that personal injury litigation and public health objectives may be complimentary and mutually reinforcing. Some areas of tort law, such as mass torts against tobacco companies, toxic polluters, …
Mixing Oil And Water: Reconciling The Substantial Factor And Results-With-In-The-Risk Approaches To Proximate Cause, Peter Zablotsky
Mixing Oil And Water: Reconciling The Substantial Factor And Results-With-In-The-Risk Approaches To Proximate Cause, Peter Zablotsky
Scholarly Works
No abstract provided.
The Effect Of Judicial Expedience On Attorney Fees In Class Actions, Eric Helland, Jonathan Klick
The Effect Of Judicial Expedience On Attorney Fees In Class Actions, Eric Helland, Jonathan Klick
All Faculty Scholarship
Judges facing exogenous constraints on their pecuniary income have an incentive to reduce their workload to increase their private welfare. In the face of an increase in caseload, this incentive will induce judges to attempt to terminate some cases more rapidly. In class action cases, failing to grant an attorney fee request will delay termination. This conflict is likely to lead judges to authorize higher fees as court congestion increases. Using two data sets of class action settlements, we show that attorney fees are significantly and positively related to the congestion level of the court hearing the case.
Post-Realist Blues: Formalism, Instrumentalism, And The Hybrid Nature Of Common Law Jurisprudence, Marin Roger Scordato
Post-Realist Blues: Formalism, Instrumentalism, And The Hybrid Nature Of Common Law Jurisprudence, Marin Roger Scordato
Scholarly Articles
At the beginning of the twentieth century, it was widely believed that appellate courts determined the outcome of disputed issues of law predominately by the application of pre-existing precedent and time honored legal maxims. The primary work of the common law courts was thought to be this distinctive identification, maintenance, inductive development and case specific deductive application of the body of precedent in its jurisdiction, sometimes known as formalism.
Starting with the influence of the legal realists in the 1920s, a profound shift took place in the dominant conception of the nature of common law jurisprudence. Here, at the beginning …
The International Legal Environment For Serious Political Reporting Has Fundamentally Changed: Understanding The Revolutionary New Era Of English Defamation Law, Marin Roger Scordato
The International Legal Environment For Serious Political Reporting Has Fundamentally Changed: Understanding The Revolutionary New Era Of English Defamation Law, Marin Roger Scordato
Scholarly Articles
On October 11, 2006, Britain's highest court, the House of Lords, issued a blockbuster ruling that completely changed the landscape of libel law and press freedoms in the United Kingdom. The Times of London described the case, Jameel v. Wall Street Journal, as, "a judgment that lawyers predict will usher in a new era of journalism." Given England's reputation as an attractive jurisdiction for defamation plaintiffs and a frequent destination for "libel tourism," this case is likely to alter the environment for serious political journalism throughout Europe and North America.
This article carefully describes the case, including its key holdings …
Doing Katrina Time, Pamela R. Metzger
Doing Katrina Time, Pamela R. Metzger
Faculty Journal Articles and Book Chapters
This Article explores one Katrina-law problem: the plight of the poor, unrepresented and uncharged prisoners. It attempts to explain why these detainees were unrepresented and abandoned and how we might better guarantee the quality of justice for future detainees. Katrina has proved that bright-line rules are the best lines of defense for the poor; criminal justice systems honor concrete rules more readily than abstract imperatives. Katrina also proved that good lawyering on behalf of poor people can bring joy in the midst of despair.
Reflecting On Negligence Law And The Catholic Experience: Comparing Apples And Elephants, Randy Lee
Reflecting On Negligence Law And The Catholic Experience: Comparing Apples And Elephants, Randy Lee
Randy Lee
No abstract provided.
Torts Rationales, Pluralism, And Isaiah Berlin, Christopher J. Robinette
Torts Rationales, Pluralism, And Isaiah Berlin, Christopher J. Robinette
Christopher J Robinette
Phantom Parties And Other Practical Problems With The Attempted Abolition Of Joint And Several Liability, Nancy C. Marcus
Phantom Parties And Other Practical Problems With The Attempted Abolition Of Joint And Several Liability, Nancy C. Marcus
Nancy C Marcus
In recent years, the allocation of responsibility to multiple tortfeasors and corresponding limitations on joint and several liability have been mired with uncertainty and change. This article describes the various forms of tort reform legislation limiting joint and several liability, explaining that some states limit joint and several liability according to the proportionality of the plaintiff's comparative fault, explaining that there is no clear majority approach to joint and several liability legislation and its interpretation by the courts, that a number of states have resisted the trend toward modifying joint and several liability, and that no state has enacted legislation …