Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Takings

Fordham Urban Law Journal

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Law

The Use And Abuse Of Blight In Eminent Domain, Martin E. Gold, Lynne B. Sagalyn Jan 2011

The Use And Abuse Of Blight In Eminent Domain, Martin E. Gold, Lynne B. Sagalyn

Fordham Urban Law Journal

This Article examines the term "blight" and how it is used in eminent domain cases. Part I discusses the development of the term and how various states define it. Part II lays out a hierarchy which may be used to compare the private benefits on one hand and the public benefits on the other hand in redevelopment projects. In Part III, the Columbia University expansion in Manhattanville is examined, at both the New York Appellate Division and Court of Appeals levels. Part IV discusses how forty-three states redefined blight after the Kelo case. Part V discusses how political and business …


Reconstructing The Takings Doctrine By Redefining Property And Sovereignty, John Martinez Jan 1988

Reconstructing The Takings Doctrine By Redefining Property And Sovereignty, John Martinez

Fordham Urban Law Journal

In 1987, the Supreme Court decided three cases involving "takings" challenges to governmental exercise of the power to control land use. This trilogy of cases affirmed the continuing validity of a three-part analytical model in addressing the takings problem: (1) is private property involved; (2) has governmental action so affected it as to require a remedy; and (3) what remedy should be provided? This Article critically examines that model and argues that the first two questions are fundamentally indistinguishable and that to treat them as distinct inquiries is unworkable. The Article then proposes a functional approach under which individuals are …


Regulatory Taking: A Contract Approach, Ross B. Lipsker, Rebecca L. Heldt Jan 1988

Regulatory Taking: A Contract Approach, Ross B. Lipsker, Rebecca L. Heldt

Fordham Urban Law Journal

This Article begins by defining the parameters of the fifth amendment's taking clause. The Article then reviews the various tests used in determining whether governmental action constitutes a taking, and discusses the recent Supreme Court decisions within the framework of case law as it has evolved since the Court's 1922 landmark decision, Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon. Finally, the Article suggests a formula based on well-established contract principles for analyzing the impact of land use regulation on private property interests.