Law Commons^™

Stargazing: The Future Of American Products Liability Law, James A. Henderson Jr., Aaron Twerski

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Strict Liability In Action: The Truncated Learned Hand Formula, Thomas C. Galligan Jr.

Louisiana Law Review

No abstract provided.

Some Observations On Strict Liability In The Louisiana Law Of Garde, William Powers Jr.

Louisiana Law Review

No abstract provided.

The Illusive Meaning Of The Term “Product” Under Section 402a Of The Restatement (Second) Of Torts, Charles E. Cantú

Faculty Articles

The impact of Section 402A of the Restatement (Second) of Torts had far-reaching effects. The most noticeable of these effects was that strict liability was accepted as a cause of action in almost all cases involving defective products. As a result, there was an explosion of products liability litigation, and suits involving strict liability for defective products soon outnumbered all other tort cases.

Naturally, the vast number of lawsuits caused some confusion. Courts interpreted some terms of Section 402A to include individuals and events not originally mentioned, while other terms, which at first were thought to be clear and concise, …

Pyrrhic Victories And Glorious Defeats: Why Defendants Are Winning And Plaintiffs Are Losing The Struggle Over Actual Malice And Fictionalized Quotations., Richard A. Gonzales

St. Mary's Law Journal

This article reviews Masson v. New Yorker Magazine, a case of fabricated quotations. The article looks first at the legal background and Supreme Court's development of the actual malice standard. An analysis of the problem through journalistic ethics and investigation of the difficulties confronting libel plaintiffs will follow. Finally, the comment explores the misquotation problem from both a legal and a journalistic perspective.

Corporate Successors Under Strict Liability: A General Economic Theory And The Case Of Cercla, Merritt B. Fox

Faculty Scholarship

P undertakes an activity subject to strict liability that creates a risk of harm to others. The activity harms V. Before the harm becomes apparent, however, P sells its assets to S for cash and dissolves. Should V be entitled to compensation from S in P's stead? If the talk of corporate lawyers is to be believed, concern over this seemingly technical question is having a substantial impact on the salability of billions of dollars of productive assets.

With the growth of products liability litigation, state courts have given the issue of successor liability increasing attention over the last decade. …