Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Sex discrimination

Duke Law

2006

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Law

Disability, Disparate Impact, And Class Actions, Michael Ashley Stein, Michael E. Waterstone Dec 2006

Disability, Disparate Impact, And Class Actions, Michael Ashley Stein, Michael E. Waterstone

Duke Law Journal

Following Title VII's enactment, group-based employment discrimination actions flourished due to disparate impact theory and the class action device. Courts recognized that subordination that defined a group's social identity was also sufficient legally to bind members together, even when relief had to be issued individually. Woven through these cases was a notion of panethnicity that united inherently unrelated groups into a common identity, for example, Asian Americans. Stringent judicial interpretation subsequently eroded both legal frameworks and it has become increasingly difficult to assert collective employment actions, even against discriminatory practices affecting an entire group. This deconstruction has immensely disadvantaged persons …


Moving Past Hippies And Harassment: A Historical Approach To Sex, Appearance, And The Workplace, Erica Williamson Nov 2006

Moving Past Hippies And Harassment: A Historical Approach To Sex, Appearance, And The Workplace, Erica Williamson

Duke Law Journal

No abstract provided.


A National Model For Reconciling Equal Protection For Same-Sex Couples With State Marriage Amendments: Alaska Civil Liberties Union Ex Rel. Carter V. Alaska, Eric J. Lobsinger Jun 2006

A National Model For Reconciling Equal Protection For Same-Sex Couples With State Marriage Amendments: Alaska Civil Liberties Union Ex Rel. Carter V. Alaska, Eric J. Lobsinger

Alaska Law Review

No abstract provided.