Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Securities Law (17)
- Business (8)
- Banking and Finance Law (7)
- Corporate Finance (5)
- Administrative Law (3)
-
- Economics (2)
- Finance and Financial Management (2)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (2)
- Agency (1)
- Behavioral Economics (1)
- Business Law, Public Responsibility, and Ethics (1)
- Business Organizations Law (1)
- Constitutional Law (1)
- Estates and Trusts (1)
- International Economics (1)
- Law and Economics (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 26 of 26
Full-Text Articles in Law
Deterring Algorithmic Manipulation, Gina-Gail S. Fletcher
Deterring Algorithmic Manipulation, Gina-Gail S. Fletcher
Faculty Scholarship
Does the existing anti-manipulation framework effectively deter algorithmic manipulation? With the dual increase of algorithmic trading and the occurrence of “mini-flash crashes” in the market linked to manipulation, this question has become more pressing in recent years. In the past thirty years, the financial markets have undergone a sea change as technological advancements and innovations have fundamentally altered the structure and operation of the markets. Key to this change is the introduction and dominance of trading algorithms. Whereas initial algorithmic trading relied on preset electronic instructions to execute trading strategies, new technology is introducing artificially intelligent (“AI”) trading algorithms that …
Revolving Elites: The Unexplored Risk Of Capturing The Sec, James D. Cox, Randall S. Thomas
Revolving Elites: The Unexplored Risk Of Capturing The Sec, James D. Cox, Randall S. Thomas
Faculty Scholarship
Fears have abounded for years that the sweet spot for capture of regulatory agencies is the "revolving door" whereby civil servants migrate from their roles as regulators to private industry. Recent scholarship on this topic has examined whether America's watchdog for securities markets, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), is hobbled by the long-standing practices of its enforcement staff exiting their jobs at the Commission and migrating to lucrative private sector employment where they represent those they once regulated. The research to date has been inconclusive on whether staff revolving door practices have weakened the SEC' s verve. In this …
Seeking An Objective For Regulating Insider Trading Through Texas Gulf Sulphur, James D. Cox
Seeking An Objective For Regulating Insider Trading Through Texas Gulf Sulphur, James D. Cox
Faculty Scholarship
Data summarized in the opening of this article document that inside trading is a growth industry. And, as deals get ever bigger, the growth curve becomes steeper as more the data confirms intuition that the more who know about a good thing the more who will seek to harvest its benefits. Even though insider trading appears to have thrived during the fifty years after Texas Gulf Sulphur, we gather in this symposium to celebrate the decision. But why? As developed below, the Second Circuit’s landmark decision gave way to the Supreme Court’s erection of a fiduciary framework that this article …
The Deregulation Of Private Capital And The Decline Of The Public Company, Elisabeth De Fontenay
The Deregulation Of Private Capital And The Decline Of The Public Company, Elisabeth De Fontenay
Faculty Scholarship
From its inception, the federal securities law regime created and enforced a major divide between public and private capital raising. Firms that chose to “go public” took on substantial disclosure burdens, but in exchange were given the exclusive right to raise capital from the general public. Over time, however, the disclosure quid pro quo has been subverted: Public companies are still asked to disclose, yet capital is flooding into private companies with regulators’ blessing.
This Article provides a critique of the new public-private divide centered on its information effects. While regulators may have hoped for both the private and public …
Benchmark Regulation, Gina-Gail S. Fletcher
Benchmark Regulation, Gina-Gail S. Fletcher
Faculty Scholarship
Benchmarks are metrics that are deeply embedded in the financial markets. They are essential to the efficient functioning of the markets and are used in a wide variety of ways—from pricing oil to setting interest rates for consumer lending to valuing complex financial instruments. In recent years, benchmarks have also been at the epicenter of numerous, multi-year market manipulation scandals. Oil traders, for example, deliberately execute trades to drive benchmarks lower artificially, allowing the traders to capitalize on the manipulated benchmarks. This ensures that later trades relying on the benchmarks will be more profitable than they otherwise would have been. …
Deterring Holdout Creditors In A Restructuring Of Pdvsa Bonds And Promissory Notes (¿Cómo Disuadir A Acreedores 'Holdout' En Una Restructuración De Bonos Y Pagarés De Pdvsa?), Lee C. Buchheit, Mitu Gulati
Deterring Holdout Creditors In A Restructuring Of Pdvsa Bonds And Promissory Notes (¿Cómo Disuadir A Acreedores 'Holdout' En Una Restructuración De Bonos Y Pagarés De Pdvsa?), Lee C. Buchheit, Mitu Gulati
Faculty Scholarship
The prospect of the potential mischief that may be caused by holdout creditors in a Venezuelan sovereign debt restructuring is probably the main reason why the Maduro administration has not attempted such an exercise. The next administration in Venezuela — whenever and however it may arrive — will not want for suggestions about how to minimize or neutralize this holdout creditor threat. This short article is another contribution to that growing literature. Were the Republic of Venezuela to acknowledge that there really is only one public sector credit risk in the country, and that the distinction between Republic bonds and …
Quieting The Sharholders' Voice: Empirical Evidence Of Pervasive Bundling In Proxy Solicitations, James D. Cox, Fabrizio Ferri, Colleen Honigsberg, Randall S. Thomas
Quieting The Sharholders' Voice: Empirical Evidence Of Pervasive Bundling In Proxy Solicitations, James D. Cox, Fabrizio Ferri, Colleen Honigsberg, Randall S. Thomas
Faculty Scholarship
The integrity of shareholder voting is critical to the legitimacy of corporate law. One threat to this process is proxy “bundling,” or the joinder of more than one separate item into a single proxy proposal. Bundling deprives shareholders of the right to convey their views on each separate matter being put to a vote and forces them to either reject the entire proposal or approve items they might not otherwise want implemented.
In this Paper, we provide the first comprehensive evaluation of the anti-bundling rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) in 1992. While we find that the …
Brief Of Prof. Steven L. Schwarcz As Amicus Curiae, Steven L. Schwarcz
Brief Of Prof. Steven L. Schwarcz As Amicus Curiae, Steven L. Schwarcz
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
"We're Cool" Statements After Omnicare: Securities Fraud Suits For Failures To Comply With The Law, James D. Cox
"We're Cool" Statements After Omnicare: Securities Fraud Suits For Failures To Comply With The Law, James D. Cox
Faculty Scholarship
As part of a symposium celebrating the multiple contributions of the late Alan Bromberg, this article examines implications flowing from the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Omnicare Inc. v. Laborers District Council Construction Industry Pension Fund. Because Omnicare lands so squarely on the Court’s earlier opaque opinion in Virginia Bankshares, Inc. v. Sandberg addressing the treatment of the materiality of opinion statements, Omnicare is the new currency in the realm that will have far-reaching implications. In Virginia Bankshares, the Supreme Court quickly concluded shareholders would attach significance to the board of directors’ statement that the cash-out merger …
Putting The Securities Laws To The Test: The Long-Standing Approach To Federal Securities Regulation Is Not Working, Elisabeth De Fontenay
Putting The Securities Laws To The Test: The Long-Standing Approach To Federal Securities Regulation Is Not Working, Elisabeth De Fontenay
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Do The Securities Laws Matter? The Rise Of The Leveraged Loan Market, Elisabeth De Fontenay
Do The Securities Laws Matter? The Rise Of The Leveraged Loan Market, Elisabeth De Fontenay
Faculty Scholarship
One of the enduring principles of federal securities regulation is the mantra that bonds are securities, while commercial loans are not. Yet the corporate bond and loan markets in the U.S. are rapidly converging, putting significant pressure on the disparity in their regulatory treatment. As securities, corporate bonds are subject to onerous public disclosure obligations and liability regimes, which corporate loans avoid entirely. This longstanding regulatory distinction between loans and bonds is based on the traditional conception of a commercial loan as a long-term relationship between the borrowing company and a single bank, in contrast to bonds, which may be …
Brief Of Financial Economists As Amici Curiae In Support Of Respondents, Ernest A. Young
Brief Of Financial Economists As Amici Curiae In Support Of Respondents, Ernest A. Young
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Brief Of Common Law Scholars As Amici Curiae In Support Of Respondents, Samuel W. Buell, Deborah A. Demott, James D. Cox, Ernest A. Young, Ann Lipton
Brief Of Common Law Scholars As Amici Curiae In Support Of Respondents, Samuel W. Buell, Deborah A. Demott, James D. Cox, Ernest A. Young, Ann Lipton
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
The 2011 Diane Sanger Memorial Lecture Protecting Investors In Securitization Transactions: Does Dodd–Frank Help, Or Hurt?, Steven L. Schwarcz
The 2011 Diane Sanger Memorial Lecture Protecting Investors In Securitization Transactions: Does Dodd–Frank Help, Or Hurt?, Steven L. Schwarcz
Faculty Scholarship
Securitization has been called into question because of its role in the recent financial crisis. Schwarcz examines the potential flaws in the securitization process and compare how the Dodd–Frank Act treats them. Although Dodd–Frank addresses one of the flaws, it underregulates or fails to regulate other flaws. It also overregulates by addressing aspects of securitization that are not flawed.
Why Didn’T Subprime Investors Demand A (Much Larger) Lemons Premium?, Claire A. Hill
Why Didn’T Subprime Investors Demand A (Much Larger) Lemons Premium?, Claire A. Hill
Law and Contemporary Problems
The subprime crisis would never have occurred had investors not been such enthusiastic consumers of subprime securities. The investors now say, somewhat self-servingly (but probably correctly), that they did not understand the securities -- securities for which they were willing to pay very high prices. Investors' willingness to purchase these securities on terms that were favorable to the sellers, and unfavorable to them, presents a considerable puzzle. Investors do not want to miss out on the next big thing.
Reinventing The Sec By Staring Into Its Past, James D. Cox
Reinventing The Sec By Staring Into Its Past, James D. Cox
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Keynote Address: The Conflicted Trustee Dilemma, Steven L. Schwarcz
Keynote Address: The Conflicted Trustee Dilemma, Steven L. Schwarcz
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
An Empirical Study Of Securities Disclosure Practice, Mitu Gulati, Stephen J. Choi
An Empirical Study Of Securities Disclosure Practice, Mitu Gulati, Stephen J. Choi
Faculty Scholarship
Using a dataset of sovereign bond offering documents and underlying bond contracts for ten sovereign issuers from 1985-2005, we examine the securities disclosure practices of issuers and attorneys. The sovereign bond market is comprised of sophisticated issuers with highly paid law firms. If anyone complies fully with federal securities disclosure requirements, we expect sovereign issuers and their attorneys to do so. On the other hand, network effects that determine what information issuers chose to disclose as well as the high cost of determining what information is required for disclosure may lead issuers to fail to meet their disclosure duties. We …
The Muddled Duty To Disclose Under Rule 10b-5, Donald C. Langevoort, G. Mitu Gulati
The Muddled Duty To Disclose Under Rule 10b-5, Donald C. Langevoort, G. Mitu Gulati
Faculty Scholarship
No abstract provided.
Measuring Securities Market Efficiency In The Regulatory Setting, Randall S. Thomas, James F. Cotter
Measuring Securities Market Efficiency In The Regulatory Setting, Randall S. Thomas, James F. Cotter
Law and Contemporary Problems
In Nov 1998, the SEC proposed a modification to the federal securities law disclosure requirements to facilitate the process of issuing new securities. Thomas and Cotter discuss how to determine when companies should be able to issue simplified disclosure documents.
Beyond Bond Markets 2000: The Electronic Frontier And Regulation Of The Capital Markets For Debt Securities, Stephen Wallenstein
Beyond Bond Markets 2000: The Electronic Frontier And Regulation Of The Capital Markets For Debt Securities, Stephen Wallenstein
Law and Contemporary Problems
On Oct 18-19, 1999, more than fifty securities lawyers, representatives of ratings agencies, regulators and academics gathered in Washington DC for a conference on the regulation of capital markets for debt securities. Some of the recurrent themes and conclusions arising from deliberations by conference participants are discussed.
Securities Laws And The Social Costs Of Inaccurate Stock Prices, Marcel Kahan
Securities Laws And The Social Costs Of Inaccurate Stock Prices, Marcel Kahan
Duke Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Regulatory Principles And The Internationalization Of Securities Markets, Robert P. Austin
Regulatory Principles And The Internationalization Of Securities Markets, Robert P. Austin
Law and Contemporary Problems
No abstract provided.
Mismatching Convertible Debentures And Common Stock Under Section 16(B), Daniel B. Bogart
Mismatching Convertible Debentures And Common Stock Under Section 16(B), Daniel B. Bogart
Duke Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Express Versus Automatic Assignment Of Section 10(B) Causes Of Action, David C. Profilet
Express Versus Automatic Assignment Of Section 10(B) Causes Of Action, David C. Profilet
Duke Law Journal
In Lowry v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad, 1 the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit considered whether the owner of a security may assert his seller's section 10(b) cause of action if the current owner did not receive an express assignment of the seller's rights. 2 That is, if the seller of a security has a section 10(b) claim, does the seller's cause of action "run with the security" so that the seller's purchaser takes the seller's cause of action by automatic assignment, or must the purchaser secure an express assignment of the seller's cause of action …
Implied Contribution Under The Federal Securities Laws: A Reassessment, Mark J. Loewenstein
Implied Contribution Under The Federal Securities Laws: A Reassessment, Mark J. Loewenstein
Duke Law Journal
No abstract provided.