Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Civil Rights and Discrimination (72)
- Law and Race (67)
- Law Enforcement and Corrections (43)
- Criminal Law (41)
- Law and Society (29)
-
- Constitutional Law (28)
- Criminal Procedure (24)
- Fourth Amendment (21)
- Immigration Law (14)
- Fourteenth Amendment (13)
- Jurisprudence (9)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (9)
- Legislation (8)
- Sociology (7)
- Law and Gender (6)
- Law and Politics (6)
- Race and Ethnicity (6)
- Courts (5)
- Legal History (5)
- National Security Law (5)
- Human Rights Law (4)
- Inequality and Stratification (4)
- Legal Remedies (4)
- Public Law and Legal Theory (4)
- Civil Procedure (3)
- Health Law and Policy (3)
- State and Local Government Law (3)
- Supreme Court of the United States (3)
- African American Studies (2)
- Institution
-
- University of Michigan Law School (19)
- Selected Works (18)
- Columbia Law School (10)
- University of Pittsburgh School of Law (10)
- Touro University Jacob D. Fuchsberg Law Center (7)
-
- Boston University School of Law (6)
- University of Colorado Law School (6)
- Duke Law (5)
- St. Mary's University (5)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (5)
- Cornell University Law School (3)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (3)
- SelectedWorks (3)
- University of Florida Levin College of Law (3)
- University of Missouri School of Law (3)
- University of St. Thomas, Minnesota (3)
- Penn State Law (2)
- St. John's University School of Law (2)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (2)
- University of Georgia School of Law (2)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (2)
- Washington and Lee University School of Law (2)
- BLR (1)
- Case Western Reserve University School of Law (1)
- Florida A&M University College of Law (1)
- George Washington University Law School (1)
- Georgetown University Law Center (1)
- Georgia State University College of Law (1)
- Loyola Marymount University and Loyola Law School (1)
- Loyola University Chicago, School of Law (1)
- Publication Year
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (17)
- Articles (14)
- Michigan Journal of Race and Law (14)
- Scholarly Works (7)
- Publications (6)
-
- Law and Contemporary Problems (4)
- Touro Law Review (4)
- Civil Rights & Human Rights (3)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (3)
- Faculty Publications (3)
- Lawrence Rosenthal (3)
- Marjorie A. Silver (3)
- Missouri Law Review (3)
- The Scholar: St. Mary's Law Review on Race and Social Justice (3)
- UF Law Faculty Publications (3)
- University of St. Thomas Law Journal (3)
- Journal Articles (2)
- Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity (2)
- Sherry Colb (2)
- University of Maryland Law Journal of Race, Religion, Gender and Class (2)
- University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform (2)
- Victor C. Romero (2)
- Washington and Lee Journal of Civil Rights and Social Justice (2)
- Arkansas Law Review (1)
- Bill Ong Hing (1)
- Case Western Reserve Law Review (1)
- Christopher F. Bagnato (1)
- Con Law Center Articles and Publications (1)
- Department of Justice Studies Faculty Scholarship and Creative Works (1)
- Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 1 - 30 of 140
Full-Text Articles in Law
Deprogramming Bias: Expanding The Exclusionary Rule To Pretextual Traffic Stop Using Data From Autonomous Vehicle And Drive-Assistance Technology, Joe Hillman
University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform
As autonomous vehicles become more commonplace and roads become safer, this new technology provides an opportunity for courts to reconsider the constitutional rationale of modern search and seizure law. The Supreme Court should allow drivers to use evidence of police officer conduct relative to their vehicle’s technological capabilities to argue that a traffic stop was pretextual, meaning they were stopped for reasons other than their supposed violation. Additionally, the Court should expand the exclusionary rule to forbid the use of evidence extracted after a pretextual stop. The Court should retain some exceptions to the expanded exclusionary rule, such as when …
Rewriting Whren V. United States, Jonathan Feingold, Devon Carbado
Rewriting Whren V. United States, Jonathan Feingold, Devon Carbado
Faculty Scholarship
In 1996, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Whren v. United States—a unanimous opinion in which the Court effectively constitutionalized racial profiling. Despite its enduring consequences, Whren remains good law today. This Article rewrites the opinion. We do so, in part, to demonstrate how one might incorporate racial justice concerns into Fourth Amendment jurisprudence, a body of law that has long elided and marginalized the racialized dimensions of policing. A separate aim is to reveal the “false necessity” of the Whren outcome. The fact that Whren was unanimous, and that even progressive Justices signed on, might lead one to conclude that …
U.S. Policing As Racialized Violence And Control: A Qualitative Assessment Of Black Narratives From Ferguson, Missouri, Jason M. Williams
U.S. Policing As Racialized Violence And Control: A Qualitative Assessment Of Black Narratives From Ferguson, Missouri, Jason M. Williams
Department of Justice Studies Faculty Scholarship and Creative Works
U.S. policing has long been captured within a master narrative of colorblind consensus; however, distinct lived experiences between community groups depict grave disparities in law enforcement experiences and perceptions. Orthodox conceptions of law enforcement ultimately silence marginalized voices disproportionately affected by negative contacts with law enforcement. Centering data in critical theory, this study will present thematic results from semi-interviews gathered in Ferguson, M.O., during a critical ethnographic research project. Themes reveal experiences and perceptions of racialized and violent policing, the unique position of Black officers, and regard for the impact police have on children. Results also help to foreground new …
A Government Of Laws That Is A Government Of Men And Women, Mark Tushnet
A Government Of Laws That Is A Government Of Men And Women, Mark Tushnet
Arkansas Law Review
I take Mark Killenbeck’s “provocative” article as an occasion for some informal comments about what Korematsu and Trump v. Hawaii tell us about the saying, “a government of laws, not a government of men and women.” My basic thought is that the “not” in the saying has to be replaced “but also.” And, in some sense we have always had to have known that the saying was wrong as stated. Whatever the laws are, they don’t make themselves. Nor do they administer themselves, nor interpret themselves. Men and women appear at the stages of enactment, application, and adjudication. So, for …
Analyzing Wrongful Convictions Beyond The Traditional Canonical List Of Errors, For Enduring Structural And Sociological Attributes, (Juveniles, Racism, Adversary System, Policing Policies), Leona D. Jochnowitz, Tonya Kendall
Analyzing Wrongful Convictions Beyond The Traditional Canonical List Of Errors, For Enduring Structural And Sociological Attributes, (Juveniles, Racism, Adversary System, Policing Policies), Leona D. Jochnowitz, Tonya Kendall
Touro Law Review
Researchers identify possible structural causes for wrongful convictions: racism, justice system culture, adversary system, plea bargaining, media, juvenile and mentally impaired accused, and wars on drugs and crime. They indicate that unless the root causes of conviction error are identified, the routine explanations of error (e.g., eyewitness identifications; false confessions) will continue to re-occur. Identifying structural problems may help to prevent future wrongful convictions. The research involves the coding of archival data from the Innocence Project for seventeen cases, including the one for the Central Park Five exonerees. The data were coded by Hartwick College and Northern Vermont University students …
Asian Americans And Pacific Islanders And The Prison Industrial Complex, Raymond Magsaysay
Asian Americans And Pacific Islanders And The Prison Industrial Complex, Raymond Magsaysay
Michigan Journal of Race and Law
Recent uprisings against racial injustice, sparked by the killings of George Floyd and others, have triggered urgent calls to overhaul the U.S. criminal “justice” system. Yet Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders (AAPIs), the fastest-growing racial group in the country, have largely been left out of these conversations. Identifying and addressing this issue, I intercalate AAPIs into powerful, contemporary critiques of the prison industrial complex, including emergent abolitionist legal scholarship. I argue that the model minority myth, an anti-Black racial project, leads to the exclusion of AAPIs in mainstream and critical studies of crime and carcerality. I begin the intervention by …
Race, Dignity, And Commerce, Lu-In Wang
Race, Dignity, And Commerce, Lu-In Wang
Articles
This Essay was written at the invitation of the Journal of Law and Commerce to contribute a piece on racism and commerce—an invitation that was welcome and well timed. It arrived as renewed attention was focused on racialized policing following the killing of George Floyd and in the midst of the worsening pandemic that highlighted unrelenting racial, social, and economic inequities in our society.
The connections between racism and commerce are potentially numerous, but the relationship between discriminatory policing and commerce might not be apparent. This Essay links them through the concept of dignity. Legal scholar John Felipe Acevedo has …
Policing And "Bluelining", Aya Gruber
Policing And "Bluelining", Aya Gruber
Publications
In this Commentary written for the Frankel Lecture symposium on police killings of Black Americans, I explore the increasingly popular claim that racialized brutality is not a malfunction of policing but its function. Or, as Paul Butler counsels, “Don’t get it twisted—the criminal justice system ain’t broke. It’s working just the way it’s supposed to.” This claim contradicts the conventional narrative, which remains largely accepted, that the police exist to vindicate the community’s interest in solving, reducing, and preventing crime. A perusal of the history of organized policing in the United States, however, reveals that it was never mainly about …
Unshackling Plea Bargaining From Racial Bias, Elayne E. Greenberg
Unshackling Plea Bargaining From Racial Bias, Elayne E. Greenberg
Faculty Publications
“History, despite its wrenching pain, cannot be unlived, [but] if faced with courage, need not be lived again.”
Dr. Maya Angelou
When an African American male defendant tries to plea bargain an equitable justice outcome, he finds that the deep-rooted racial bias that casts African American men as dangerous, criminal and animalistic, compromises his justice rights. Plea bargaining has become the preferred process used to secure convictions for upwards of 97 percent of cases because of its efficiency. This efficiency, however, comes at a cost. The structure and process of plea bargaining makes it more likely that the historical racial …
An Empirical Assessment Of Pretextual Stops And Racial Profiling, Stephen Rushin
An Empirical Assessment Of Pretextual Stops And Racial Profiling, Stephen Rushin
Faculty Publications & Other Works
This Article empirically illustrates that legal doctrines permitting police officers to engage in pretextual traffic stops may contribute to an increase in racial profiling. In 1996, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Whren v. United States that pretextual traffic stops do not violate the Fourth Amendment. As long as police officers identify an objective violation of a traffic law, they may lawfully stop a motorist--even if their actual intention is to use the stop to investigate a hunch that by itself does not amount to probable cause or reasonable suspicion.
Scholars and civil rights activists have sharply criticized Whren, …
The Music Of Mass Incarceration, Andrea L. Dennis
The Music Of Mass Incarceration, Andrea L. Dennis
Scholarly Works
Intellectual property law reaches every aspect of the world, society, and creativity. Sometimes, creative expression is at the very crux of societal conflict and change. Through its history, rap music has demonstrated passionate creative expression, exploding with emotion and truths. Now the most popular musical genre in America, rap has always shared—and consistently critiqued—disproportionate effects of the criminal legal system on Black communities. The world is increasingly hearing these tunes with special acuity and paying more attention to the lyrics. Virtually every music recording artist would consider the following numbers a major career achievement: 500 percent increase; 222 percent growth; …
Racial & Identity Profiling Advisory Board Annual Report 2020, Racial & Identity Profiling Advisory Board
Racial & Identity Profiling Advisory Board Annual Report 2020, Racial & Identity Profiling Advisory Board
Civil Rights & Human Rights
California’s Racial and Identity Profiling Advisory Board (Board) is pleased to release its Third Annual Report. The Board was created by the Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015 (RIPA) to shepherd data collection and provide public reports with the ultimate objective to eliminate racial and identity profiling and improve and understand diversity in law enforcement through training, education, and outreach. For the first time, the Board’s report includes an analysis of the stop data collected under RIPA, which requires nearly all California law enforcement agencies to submit demographic data on all detentions and searches. This report also provides recommendations …
Race, Space, And Surveillance: A Response To #Livingwhileblack: Blackness As Nuisance, Lolita Buckner Inniss
Race, Space, And Surveillance: A Response To #Livingwhileblack: Blackness As Nuisance, Lolita Buckner Inniss
Publications
This article is an invited response to an American University Law Review article titled “#LivingWhileBlack: Blackness as Nuisance” that has been widely discussed in the news media and in academic circles.
The Troubling Alliance Between Feminism And Policing, Aya Gruber
The Troubling Alliance Between Feminism And Policing, Aya Gruber
Publications
No abstract provided.
Confessions, Convictions And Controversy: An Examination Of False Confessions Leading To Wrongful Convictions In The United States Throughout History, Kirandeep Kaur
Journal of Race, Gender, and Ethnicity
No abstract provided.
Racial Profiling: Past, Present, And Future, David A. Harris
Racial Profiling: Past, Present, And Future, David A. Harris
Articles
It has been more than two decades since the introduction of the first bill in Congress that addressed racial profiling in 1997. Between then and now, Congress never passed legislation on the topic, but more than half the states passed laws and many police departments put anti-profiling policies in place to combat it. The research and data on racial profiling has grown markedly over the last twenty-plus years. We know that the practice is real (contrary to many denials), and the data reveal racial profiling’s shortcomings and great social costs. Nevertheless, racial profiling persists. While it took root most prominently …
Suspicionless Witness Stops: The New Racial Profiling, Michael Gentithes
Suspicionless Witness Stops: The New Racial Profiling, Michael Gentithes
Con Law Center Articles and Publications
Young men of color in high-crime neighborhoods are surrounded by poverty and crime, yet distrustful of the police who frequently stop, frisk, and arrest them and their friends. Every encounter with the police carries the potential for a new arrest or worse, fostering a culture of fear and distrust of law enforcement. That culture exacerbates the problems facing the officers patrolling these neighborhoods as more crimes go unsolved because witnesses are unwilling to come forward.
In the past several decades, officers have responded by using a stop-and-frisk technique of dubious constitutionality to control crime. Despite its disastrous implications for the …
Profiling And Consent: Stops, Searches, And Seizures After Soto, Jeffrey A. Fagan, Amanda Geller
Profiling And Consent: Stops, Searches, And Seizures After Soto, Jeffrey A. Fagan, Amanda Geller
Faculty Scholarship
Following Soto v. State (1999), New Jersey was the first state to enter into a Consent Decree with the U.S. Department of Justice to end racially selective enforcement on the state’s highways. The Consent Decree led to extensive reforms in the training and supervision of state police troopers, and the design of information technology to monitor the activities of the State Police. Compliance was assessed in part on the State’s progress toward the elimination of racial disparities in the patterns of highway stops and searches. We assess compliance by analyzing data on 257,000 vehicle stops on the New Jersey Turnpike …
Racial & Identity Profiling Advisory Board Annual Report 2019, Racial & Identity Profiling Advisory Board
Racial & Identity Profiling Advisory Board Annual Report 2019, Racial & Identity Profiling Advisory Board
Civil Rights & Human Rights
California's Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015 (RIPA) is truly groundbreaking legislation - the first of its kind and scale in the United States. This law requires nearly all California law enforcement agencies to collect, maintain, and analyze demographic data on all detentions and searches, thereby codifying the recommendation of the President's Task Force on 21st Century Policing which aimed to improve understanding and create evidence based policies through this data collection. The Racial and Identity Profiling Advisory Board (Board) was created by the Act to shepherd this data collection and provide public reports with the ultimate objective to …
Martin Luther King Jr. And Pretext Stops (And Arrests): Reflections On How Far We Have Not Come Fifty Years Later, Tracey Maclin, Maria Savarese
Martin Luther King Jr. And Pretext Stops (And Arrests): Reflections On How Far We Have Not Come Fifty Years Later, Tracey Maclin, Maria Savarese
Faculty Scholarship
By January, 1956, the Montgomery Bus boycott was in full-swing. Black citizens in Montgomery, Alabama were refusing to ride the city’s private buses to protest racially segregated seating. On the afternoon of January 26, 1956, twenty-seven-year-old Martin Luther King, Jr. had finished his day of work at the Dexter Avenue Baptist Church in Montgomery. On his drive home, King stopped his vehicle to offer a ride to a group of bus boycotters standing at a downtown car-pool location. After the boycotters entered King’s car, two motorcycle policemen pulled-in behind King’s vehicle. While everyone in King’s car tried to remain calm, …
Immigration Federalism In Minnesota: What Does Sanctuary Mean In Practice?, Virgil Wiebe
Immigration Federalism In Minnesota: What Does Sanctuary Mean In Practice?, Virgil Wiebe
University of St. Thomas Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Natural Persistence Of Racial Disparities In Crime-Based Removals, Carrie L. Rosenbaum
The Natural Persistence Of Racial Disparities In Crime-Based Removals, Carrie L. Rosenbaum
University of St. Thomas Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The Right To Remain In Safety: The Impact Of Community Leadership On Philadelphia's Ice Holds Policy, Caitlin Barry
The Right To Remain In Safety: The Impact Of Community Leadership On Philadelphia's Ice Holds Policy, Caitlin Barry
University of St. Thomas Law Journal
No abstract provided.
Racial & Identity Profiling Advisory Board Annual Report 2018, Racial & Identity Profiling Advisory Board
Racial & Identity Profiling Advisory Board Annual Report 2018, Racial & Identity Profiling Advisory Board
Civil Rights & Human Rights
The Racial and Identity Profiling Advisory (RIPA) Board began its work in July 2016 as part of the Racial and Identity Profiling Act of 2015 (AB 953) with a momentous purpose: to eliminate racial and identity profiling and improve racial and identity sensitivity in law enforcement.1 In order to achieve these goals, the RIPA Board was charged with several responsibilities including publishing an annual report on the past and current status of racial and identity profiling with policy recommendations for eliminating it. This is the first report of the RIPA Board, and similarly represents California’s first ever statewide report on …
A Genealogy Of Programmatic Stop And Frisk: A Discourse-To-Practice-Circuit, Frank Rudy Cooper
A Genealogy Of Programmatic Stop And Frisk: A Discourse-To-Practice-Circuit, Frank Rudy Cooper
Scholarly Works
President Trump has called for increased use of the recently predominant policing methodology known as programmatic stop and frisk. This Article contributes to the field by identifying, defining, and discussing five key components of the practice: (1) administratively dictated (2) pervasive Terry v. Ohio stops and frisks (3) aimed at crime prevention by means of (4) data-enhanced profiles of suspects that (5) target young racial minority men. Whereas some scholars see programmatic stop and frisk as solely the product of individual police officer bias, this Article argues for understanding how we arrived at specific police practices by analyzing three levels …
“Show Me Your Papers”: An Equal Protection Violation Of The Rights Of Latino Men In Trump’S America, Monica Chawla
“Show Me Your Papers”: An Equal Protection Violation Of The Rights Of Latino Men In Trump’S America, Monica Chawla
Touro Law Review
No abstract provided.
Undocumented Citizens Of The United States: The Repercussions Of Denying Birth Certificates, Anna L. Lichtenberger
Undocumented Citizens Of The United States: The Repercussions Of Denying Birth Certificates, Anna L. Lichtenberger
St. Mary's Law Journal
Abstract forthcoming
The Plausible And The Possible: A Bayesian Approach To The Analysis Of Reasonable Suspicion, W. David Ball
The Plausible And The Possible: A Bayesian Approach To The Analysis Of Reasonable Suspicion, W. David Ball
Faculty Publications
The United States Supreme Court uses the wrong approach to analyze reasonable suspicion. The Court asks whether, if criminal activity were afoot, an officer would be likely to see what she saw (e.g. furtive gestures or flight from police). The ultimate question we are interested in, however, is whether, given what the officer saw, her conclusion about criminal activity was reasonable. These two questions are different. Even if it is highly likely that an officer would make a set of observations when criminal activity is afoot, it does not follow that criminal activity is itself highly likely when an officer …
Martin Luther King Jr. And Pretext Stops (And Arrests): Reflections On How Far We Have Not Come Fifty Years Later, Tracey Maclin, Maria Savarese
Martin Luther King Jr. And Pretext Stops (And Arrests): Reflections On How Far We Have Not Come Fifty Years Later, Tracey Maclin, Maria Savarese
UF Law Faculty Publications
By January, 1956, the Montgomery Bus boycott was in full-swing. Black citizens in Montgomery, Alabama were refusing to ride the city’s private buses to protest racially segregated seating. On the afternoon of January 26, 1956, twenty-seven-year-old Martin Luther King, Jr. had finished his day of work at the Dexter Avenue Baptist Church in Montgomery. On his drive home, King stopped his vehicle to offer a ride to a group of bus boycotters standing at a downtown car-pool location. After the boycotters entered King’s car, two motorcycle policemen pulled-in behind King’s vehicle. While everyone in King’s car tried to remain calm, …
Utah V. Strieff: Lemonade Stands And Dragnet Policing, Guy Padula
Utah V. Strieff: Lemonade Stands And Dragnet Policing, Guy Padula
West Virginia Law Review
No abstract provided.