Law Commons^™

'Activist Courts,' Misleading Wedge Politics And The Tragedy Of Proposition 8, M. Katherine B. Darmer

M. Katherine B. Darmer

This paper explains that Proposition 8 was uniquely devastating in that it stripped vested marriage rights away from a protected minoirty group. Previously, where voters sought to define marriage narrowly to exlude gay and lesbian couples, voters did so in advance of gay and lesbian couples having such rights. The paper defends the California Supreme Court's decision in the May 15, 2008 "Marriage Cases," criticizes misleading advertising ploys of the Proposition 8 campaign and broadly defends the role of the courts in ensuring equal protection, drawing parallels between the current fight for marriage equality and earlier fights for the rights …

Moving Beyond The 'Immutability Debate' In The Fight For Equality After, M. Katherine B. Darmer

M. Katherine B. Darmer

On May 15, 2008, the California Supreme Court issued its historic decision regarding marriage rights for same-sex couples. In the course of its opinion, the court found that classifications based upon sexual orientation are subject to the protections of "strict scrutiny" for purposes of the state's equal protection clause. The court also found that marriage is a fundamental right that extends to same-sex couples.

On November 4, 2008, 52% of California voters voted for Proposition 8, which purported to "amend" the state constitution by adding fourteen words in a new clause following the equal protection clause: "only marriage between a …