Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Publication
- File Type
Articles 1 - 6 of 6
Full-Text Articles in Law
Reconstructing A Pedagogy Of Responsibility, Barbara Bezdek
Reconstructing A Pedagogy Of Responsibility, Barbara Bezdek
Barbara L Bezdek
No abstract provided.
Federal Rule Of Evidence 502: Stirring The State Law Of Privilege And Professional Responsibility With A Federal Stick, Henry Noyes
Henry S. Noyes
Federal Rule of Evidence 502 was signed into law by President Bush on September 19, 2008. It is the last piece of the puzzle of e-discovery amendments. Rule 502 quietly takes the first steps toward federalization of two areas of law that traditionally have been subject to state regulation: The law governing waiver of the attorney-client privilege and the law governing an attorney's duties of professional conduct. This Article focuses on Rule 502(d) - the heart of this new Federal Rule of Evidence. This subsection permits a federal court to issue an order that protects against waiver of the attorney-client …
Fair Process And Fair Play: Professionally Responsible Cross-Examination, John F. Nivala
Fair Process And Fair Play: Professionally Responsible Cross-Examination, John F. Nivala
John F. Nivala
No abstract provided.
A Rose By Any Other Name? Enhancing Professionalism Through Cultural Competency, Jan L. Jacobowitz Ms.
A Rose By Any Other Name? Enhancing Professionalism Through Cultural Competency, Jan L. Jacobowitz Ms.
Jan L Jacobowitz
No abstract provided.
A Survey Of Professional Responsibility Courses At American Law Schools In 2009, Laurel S. Terry, Andrew Perlman, Margaret Raymond
A Survey Of Professional Responsibility Courses At American Law Schools In 2009, Laurel S. Terry, Andrew Perlman, Margaret Raymond
Laurel S. Terry
The Dilemma Of The Vengeful Client: A Prescriptive Framework For Cooling The Flames Of Anger, Robin Slocum
The Dilemma Of The Vengeful Client: A Prescriptive Framework For Cooling The Flames Of Anger, Robin Slocum
Robin Slocum
Lawyers are presented with a challenging dilemma when counseling angry clients who seek to use the legal system as a weapon for vengeance. Legal scholars have argued that lawyers should, where appropriate, dissuade their angry clients from litigation strategies that are immoral or arguably unethical. However, angry clients are remarkably resistant to appeals based on morality and reason. Thus, it is not surprising that lawyers have been largely ineffective in their efforts to dissuade angry clients from using the legal system as a battlefield. Instead, lawyers often reluctantly defer to clients whose judgment is impaired by their emotional reactivity.
This …