Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Privacy

2013

George Washington University Law School

Articles 1 - 3 of 3

Full-Text Articles in Law

Hipaa Turns 10: Analyzing The Past, Present, And Future Impact, Daniel J. Solove Jan 2013

Hipaa Turns 10: Analyzing The Past, Present, And Future Impact, Daniel J. Solove

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

This essay, written in a journalistic style, examines HIPAA over the past decade. The essay discusses the creation of HIPAA, the evolution of HHS enforcement, the impact of the HITECH Act, and the overall influence and effect of HIPAA on healthcare providers and organizations using medical data. Professor Solove combines analysis with interviews of key regulators and practitioners.


Privacy Self-Management And The Consent Dilemma, Daniel J. Solove Jan 2013

Privacy Self-Management And The Consent Dilemma, Daniel J. Solove

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

The current regulatory approach for protecting privacy involves what I refer to as “privacy self-management” — the law provides people with a set of rights to enable them to decide how to weigh the costs and benefits of the collection, use, or disclosure of their information. People’s consent legitimizes nearly any form of collection, use, and disclosure of personal data.

Although privacy self-management is certainly a necessary component of any regulatory regime, I contend in this Article that it is being asked to do work beyond its capabilities. Privacy self-management does not provide meaningful control. Empirical and social science research …


Reconciling Personal Information In The United States And European Union, Daniel J. Solove, Paul M. Schwartz Jan 2013

Reconciling Personal Information In The United States And European Union, Daniel J. Solove, Paul M. Schwartz

GW Law Faculty Publications & Other Works

US and EU privacy law diverge greatly. At the foundational level, they diverge in their underlying philosophy: In the US, privacy law focuses on redressing consumer harm and balancing privacy with efficient commercial transactions. In the EU, privacy is hailed as a fundamental right that trumps other interests. Even at the threshold level - determining what information is covered by the regulation - the US and EU differ significantly. The existence of personal information - commonly referred to as “personally identifiable information” (PII) - is the trigger for when privacy laws apply. PII is defined quite differently in US and …