Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Articles 1 - 9 of 9

Full-Text Articles in Law

The Appearance Of Right And The Essence Of Wrong: Metaphor And Metonymy In Law, Jeanne L. Schroeder, David G. Carlson Jan 2003

The Appearance Of Right And The Essence Of Wrong: Metaphor And Metonymy In Law, Jeanne L. Schroeder, David G. Carlson

Articles

No abstract provided.


Nietzsche And Aretaic Legal Theory, Kyron Huigens Jan 2003

Nietzsche And Aretaic Legal Theory, Kyron Huigens

Articles

No abstract provided.


Can Lawyers Be Cured?: Eternal Recurrence And The Lacanian Death Drive, Jeanne L. Schroeder Jan 2003

Can Lawyers Be Cured?: Eternal Recurrence And The Lacanian Death Drive, Jeanne L. Schroeder

Articles

No abstract provided.


Spinoza's Identity And Philosophy: Jewish Or Otherwise?, Suzanne Last Stone Jan 2003

Spinoza's Identity And Philosophy: Jewish Or Otherwise?, Suzanne Last Stone

Articles

No abstract provided.


Was Spinoza A Jewish Philosopher, J. David Bleich Jan 2003

Was Spinoza A Jewish Philosopher, J. David Bleich

Articles

No abstract provided.


Spinoza's Dialectic And The Paradoxes Of Tolerance: A Foundation For Pluralism, Michel Rosenfeld Jan 2003

Spinoza's Dialectic And The Paradoxes Of Tolerance: A Foundation For Pluralism, Michel Rosenfeld

Articles

Tolerance and pluralism seem to draw on the same criterion of legitimacy. The liberal case for tolerance, however, leads to a series of paradoxes, including Popper's paradox of tolerance according to which tolerating theintolerant is self-defeating. Spinoza's defense of tolerance as it emergesfrom his Theological-Political Treatise and his Ethics is more pervasive and much more encompasssing than the liberal justification. Spinoza justifies tolerance as a private and public virtue as well as on prudential grounds. Although Spinoza's conception of tolerance appears in significant respects paradoxical and contradictory - e.g., it is puzzling why Spinoza, the philosopher of reason, should avocate …


Paul, Pomo, And The Legitimacy Of Choice Post 9/11: A Brief Comment On Three Papers, Richard H. Weisberg Jan 2003

Paul, Pomo, And The Legitimacy Of Choice Post 9/11: A Brief Comment On Three Papers, Richard H. Weisberg

Articles

No abstract provided.


Nietzsche And The Nazis: The Impact Of National Socialism On The Philosophy Of Nietzsche, Charles M. Yablon Jan 2003

Nietzsche And The Nazis: The Impact Of National Socialism On The Philosophy Of Nietzsche, Charles M. Yablon

Articles

No abstract provided.


How To Be A Moorean, Donald H. Regan Jan 2003

How To Be A Moorean, Donald H. Regan

Articles

G. E. Moore’s position in the moral philosophy canon is paradoxical. On the one hand, he is widely regarded as the most influential moral philosopher of the twentieth century. On the other hand, his most characteristic doctrines are now more often ridiculed than defended or even discussed seriously. I shall discuss briefly a number of Moorean topics—the nonnaturalness of “good,” the open question argument, the relation of the right and the good, whether fundamental value is intrinsic, and the role of beauty—hoping to explain how a philosophically informed person could actually be a Moorean even today.1