Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
-
- Intellectual Property Law (44)
- Science and Technology Law (6)
- Law and Economics (4)
- Social and Behavioral Sciences (4)
- Antitrust and Trade Regulation (3)
-
- Health Law and Policy (3)
- Arts and Humanities (2)
- Business (2)
- Economics (2)
- Industrial Organization (2)
- International Law (2)
- Internet Law (2)
- Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration (2)
- Technology and Innovation (2)
- Administrative Law (1)
- Agriculture Law (1)
- American Studies (1)
- Communications Law (1)
- Computer Law (1)
- Computer Sciences (1)
- Contracts (1)
- Databases and Information Systems (1)
- Economic Policy (1)
- Education Policy (1)
- Energy and Utilities Law (1)
- Entrepreneurial and Small Business Operations (1)
- Food and Drug Law (1)
- Genetics and Genomics (1)
- History (1)
- Institution
-
- SelectedWorks (13)
- Selected Works (8)
- Duke Law (4)
- Santa Clara Law (4)
- American University Washington College of Law (3)
-
- Maurer School of Law: Indiana University (3)
- Pepperdine University (3)
- University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School (3)
- Boston University School of Law (2)
- Chicago-Kent College of Law (2)
- University of Washington School of Law (2)
- Cornell University Law School (1)
- Florida State University College of Law (1)
- Fordham Law School (1)
- Golden Gate University School of Law (1)
- Pace University (1)
- Schulich School of Law, Dalhousie University (1)
- University of Arkansas at Little Rock William H. Bowen School of Law (1)
- University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law (1)
- University of Missouri School of Law (1)
- University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law (1)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas -- William S. Boyd School of Law (1)
- University of Richmond (1)
- University of South Florida (1)
- Vanderbilt University Law School (1)
- Washington University in St. Louis (1)
- West Virginia University (1)
- Western Kentucky University (1)
- Western University (1)
- William & Mary Law School (1)
- Publication
-
- Faculty Scholarship (5)
- Justine Pila (5)
- Faculty Publications (4)
- All Faculty Scholarship (3)
- Daniel Kazhdan (3)
-
- Intellectual Property Brief (3)
- maayan filmar (3)
- Articles (2)
- Articles by Maurer Faculty (2)
- Chicago-Kent Journal of Intellectual Property (2)
- Pepperdine Law Review (2)
- Andrew Pierz (1)
- Articles, Book Chapters, & Popular Press (1)
- Boyd Briefs / Road Scholars (1)
- Brendan O. Baggot (1)
- Brook K. Baker (1)
- Cornell Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Dana Beldiman (1)
- Duke Law Journal (1)
- FIMS Publications (1)
- Fazal Khan (1)
- Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal (1)
- GGU Law Review Blog (1)
- Indiana Law Journal (1)
- John R. Allison (1)
- Journal of Business & Technology Law (1)
- Law Faculty Publications (1)
- Law Faculty Scholarship (1)
- Lea Shaver (1)
- Library Staff Publications (1)
- Publication Type
- File Type
Articles 61 - 66 of 66
Full-Text Articles in Law
Modifying Rand Commitments To Better Price Patents In The Standards Setting Context, Kyle Rozema
Modifying Rand Commitments To Better Price Patents In The Standards Setting Context, Kyle Rozema
Scholarship@WashULaw
This Article addresses a single problem: how can we allow engineers and scientists from different institutions to collaborate to set the best technical standards possible, not considering intellectual property (“IP”) rights, and then establish the royalty rates for each patent owner after the standard is set? The current system attempting to solve this problem requires patent owner participants to sign a Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory (“RAND”) commitment. These RAND commitments require the participants to agree an ante, i.e., before the standard is actually set, to license whatever patent rights they may ultimately have in the standard on terms that are reasonable …
Taxing Facebook Code: Debugging The Tax Code And Software, Xuan-Thao Nguyen, Jeffrey A. Maine
Taxing Facebook Code: Debugging The Tax Code And Software, Xuan-Thao Nguyen, Jeffrey A. Maine
Articles
This article sets out to analyze both intellectual property laws and tax systems as applied to computer software. It analyzes software within intellectual property's established doctrinal framework, a difficult task due to the fact that software can encompass some combination of the traits of copyrights, trade dress, patents, and trade secrets. It then examines both the federal and state tax systems governing software. It shows that fitting software within current tax schemes presents unique challenges, as software contains both tangible and intangible elements, is subject to varying intellectual property protections, and can be delivered through various media. The article argues …
Patent Litigation And The Internet, Samantha Zyontz, John R. Allison, Emerson H. Tiller, Tristan Bligh
Patent Litigation And The Internet, Samantha Zyontz, John R. Allison, Emerson H. Tiller, Tristan Bligh
Faculty Scholarship
Patent infringement litigation has not only increased dramatically in frequency over the past few decades,1 but also has also seen striking growth in both stakes and cost.2 Although a relatively rich literature has added much to our understanding of the nature, causes, and consequences of patent litigation during the past two decades,3 many interesting questions remain inadequately addressed. The nuances of and trends in patent litigation in different technology fields and industries, for example, are still understudied.4 Litigation of patents on new technologies has likewise received a dearth of attention. Here we seek to help begin …
Antitrust And The Movement Of Technology, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
Antitrust And The Movement Of Technology, Herbert J. Hovenkamp
All Faculty Scholarship
Patents create strong incentives for collaborative development. For many technologies fixed costs are extremely high in relation to variable costs. A second feature of technology that encourages collaborative development is the need for interoperability or common standards. Third, in contrast to traditional commons, intellectual property commons are almost always nonrivalrous on the supply side. If ten producers all own the rights to make a product covered by a patent, each one can make as many units as it pleases without limiting the number that others can make. That might seem to be a good thing, but considered ex ante it …
Tuning The Obviousness Inquiry After Ksr, Mark D. Janis
Tuning The Obviousness Inquiry After Ksr, Mark D. Janis
Articles by Maurer Faculty
One of the most important and delicate judicial tasks in patent law is to keep the obviousness doctrine in reasonable working order. There are several reasons why the obviousness doctrine has been the subject of frequent judicial tinkering. First, patentability doctrines interact with each other, so doctrinal alterations that seem to be entirely external to the obviousness doctrine frequently have ripple effects on obviousness. The interaction between the utility and obviousness doctrines provides one good example. Second, the obviousness doctrine is internally complex. Cases in the chemical and biotechnology areas over the past several decades have amply illustrated this point. …
Some Reflections On Method And Policy In The Crowded House Of European Patent Law And Their Implications For India, Justine Pila
Some Reflections On Method And Policy In The Crowded House Of European Patent Law And Their Implications For India, Justine Pila
Justine Pila
This article considers the appropriate method for assessing substantive principles of European patent law, including limits on European patentability. In the argument made, European patent law is a crowded house in which “substantive convergence” around principles is inevitable but unsatisfactory: it will generally be the product of complex institutional dynamics as much as principled policy making, and in the absence of unified methodology and values will fail to ensure coherence or consistency within the European patent system. The implications of this argument with respect to India are then considered, and some reflections offered regarding India's experience of patent law harmonization …