Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 3 of 3
Full-Text Articles in Law
Patent Eligible Medical And Biotechnology Inventions After Bilski, Prometheus, And Myriad, Joshua Sarnoff
Patent Eligible Medical And Biotechnology Inventions After Bilski, Prometheus, And Myriad, Joshua Sarnoff
College of Law Faculty
In Bilski v. Kappos, the U.S. Supreme Court continued to require that patentable subject matter eligibility determinations under Section 101 be made by reference to three historic, categorical exclusions, for scientific principles, natural phenomena, and abstract ideas. This excluded subject matter must be treated as if already known even when newly discovered by the applicant. Unlike in other jurisdictions, the excluded subject matter thus cannot contribute creativity to the claimed inventions, either for eligibility or for patentability evaluations. The Federal Circuit has reluctantly applied eligibility doctrine after Bilski, holding in Prometheus v. Mayo that claims to treatment methods applying the …
Patent Eligible Inventions After Bilski: History And Theory, Joshua Sarnoff
Patent Eligible Inventions After Bilski: History And Theory, Joshua Sarnoff
College of Law Faculty
The U.S. Supreme Court has continued to require that patentable subject matter eligibility determinations under Section 101 be made by reference to three historic, categorical exclusions, for scientific principles, natural phenomena, and abstract ideas, which must be treated as if already known even when newly discovered by the applicant. Various thoughtful scholars have alternatively urged that these exclusions from the patent system should be viewed restrictively or that eligibility decisions should be avoided. But these scholars underappreciate the benefits of categorical exclusions and particularly of treating them as if they were already known prior art, and in any event the …
Recent Developments Affecting The Enforcement, Procurement, And Licensing Of Research Tool Patents, Joshua Sarnoff, Christopher Holman
Recent Developments Affecting The Enforcement, Procurement, And Licensing Of Research Tool Patents, Joshua Sarnoff, Christopher Holman
College of Law Faculty
A vigorous discussion exists regarding the need to provide exclusive patent rights as incentives to invent and to disclose so-called “research tools,” whether such exclusive rights should apply to all uses and users of patented research tools, and whether exclusive rights to prohibit all uses of research tools would unduly discourage sequential invention. This article summarizes recent developments under U.S. patent laws of particular relevance to the debate over the patenting of research tools, and provides some insights into the practices of various academic sciences, industries, and government agencies regarding the treatment of these important inventions. The article provides a …