Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Ethics In Intellectual Property Negotiations: Issues And Illustrations, Lisa A. Dolak
Ethics In Intellectual Property Negotiations: Issues And Illustrations, Lisa A. Dolak
Lisa A Dolak
Negotiating – formally or informally – is a characteristic aspect of law practice. The requisite skills are acquired “on the job” and, for some, via the formal study of negotiation processes and attributes. The negotiator has much to consider, including the client’s goals and interests, likely litigation outcomes should negotiations fail or any ultimate agreement be breached, and what the counterparty is likely seeking to accomplish.
The challenges include negotiating within the limits imposed by the ethics rules. This paper identifies key authorities relevant to negotiation ethics and illustrates their operation in the context of hypotheticals based on intellectual property …
Inequitable Conduct: A Flawed Doctrine Worth Saving, Lisa A. Dolak
Inequitable Conduct: A Flawed Doctrine Worth Saving, Lisa A. Dolak
Lisa A Dolak
A growing chorus of voices is calling for reform or even elimination of the doctrine of inequitable conduct. Critics argue that innocent or even irrelevant prosecution mistakes can be met with the ultimate penalty: unenforceability of the entire patent.
There is no question the doctrine is in need of repair. Patent owners are subject to different materiality standards in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and the courts. Inequitable conduct charges can be based on information completely immaterial to patentability. Findings of deceptive intent are increasingly based on inference and not evidence. And the one-size-fits-all remedy of total unenforceability deprives …
Inequitable Conduct: A Flawed Doctrine Worth Saving, Lisa A. Dolak
Inequitable Conduct: A Flawed Doctrine Worth Saving, Lisa A. Dolak
Lisa A Dolak
A growing chorus of voices is calling for reform or even elimination of the doctrine of inequitable conduct. Critics argue that innocent or even irrelevant prosecution mistakes can be met with the ultimate penalty: unenforceability of the entire patent.
There is no question the doctrine is in need of repair. Patent owners are subject to different materiality standards in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and the courts. Inequitable conduct charges can be based on information completely immaterial to patentability. Findings of deceptive intent are increasingly based on inference and not evidence. And the one-size-fits-all remedy of total unenforceability deprives …
Ebay And The Blackberry®: A Media Coverage Case Study, Lisa A. Dolak, Blaine T. Bettinger
Ebay And The Blackberry®: A Media Coverage Case Study, Lisa A. Dolak, Blaine T. Bettinger
Lisa A Dolak
Patent owners, potential infringers, and the courts will continue to work through the implications of the Supreme Court’s 2006 decision in eBay Inc. v. MercExchange, L.L.C. for some time. We look back, however, at media coverage relating to injunctions, “trolls,” and the U.S. patent system generally, in the months preceding the Court’s decision. We show that although eBay featured prominently in news and editorial coverage while it was pending at the Court, it could not compete in the media with another patent case pending at the same time: the case that threatened to darken the Blackberry®. Further, we note that …
The United States Patent System In The Media Mirror, Lisa A. Dolak, Blaine T. Bettinger
The United States Patent System In The Media Mirror, Lisa A. Dolak, Blaine T. Bettinger
Lisa A Dolak
The last several years have witnessed a flurry of transformative patent reform activity. The Supreme Court has issued key rulings affecting the availability of injunctive and declaratory relief, revised the law of obviousness, and limited the extraterritorial reach of the patent act. Now Congress stands poised to ratify the most significant and far-reaching overhaul of the patent system in at least 45 years.
In this study, we analyzed major newspaper coverage of the patent system from January 1, 2005 through June 30, 2007 to systematically assess how the press portrayed the U.S. patent system. Our examination revealed a negative overall …