Law Commons^™

Legislation, Law Review Staff

Vanderbilt Law Review

Budget Planners--Regulation To Protect Debtors

=====================================

Criminal Law--Taxation of Court Costs

=====================================

Statute of Limitations--Professional Negligence--Foreign Objects Left in Patient's Body

Abstracts Of Recent Cases, William Walter Smith

West Virginia Law Review

No abstract provided.

Admiralty- Shipowner's Right To Indemnification For Loss Caused By Latently Defective Gear Supplied By Nonnegligent Stevedoring-Compnay, John W. Erickson

Michigan Law Review

Defendant stevedoring company contracted to perform stevedoring services for plaintiff shipowner. Pursuant to its agreement to supply gear for the job, the stevedoring company supplied a latently defective rope, the breaking of which caused injury to a longshoreman, an employee of the stevedoring company. The longshoreman obtained a judgment against the shipowner under the doctrine of unseaworthiness, and in a separate action the shipowner sought indemnification from the stevedoring company. The district court, finding the stevedoring company not negligent, denied recovery. The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed, one judge dissenting. On certiorari to the United States Supreme …

Torts -- 1963 Tennessee Survey, John W. Wade

Vanderbilt Law Review

The elements of a valid cause of action in negligence are specifically enumerated by Justice Holmes of the Tennessee Supreme Court in the case of Ruth v. Ruth:

1. A duty of care owed by the defendant to the plaintiff.

2. A failure on the part of the defendant to perform that duty.

3. An injury to the plaintiff resulting proximately from the defendant's breach of that duty of care.

This outline will be used for the treatment of general questions of negligence, and particular fact situations will then be subsequently treated.

Contracts -- 1963 Tennessee Survey, Paul J. Hartman

Vanderbilt Law Review

Both the one year provision and the sale of goods provision of the Statute of Frauds were construed in Anderson-Gregory Co. v. Lea.'Regarding the duration of the contract, the facts in the opinion are somewhat sparse... The court held that the contract did not come within this provision of the statute. If a contract could have been performed, under its terms, within a year from the time of its making, it is not within the Statute of Frauds, even though it is improbable that the contract would be performed within a year.

=================

The Tennessee Supreme Court case of Oman …

Procedure -- 1963 Tennessee Survey, William I. Harbison

Vanderbilt Law Review

In two important decisions rendered during the survey period the Tennessee Supreme Court considered some of the aspects of joinder of actions under present circuit court practice. In the first of these, Necessary v. Gibson,' plaintiff joined a count for personal injuries resulting from defendants' alleged negligence with a count seeking recovery in contract based upon alleged promises of defendants to pay plaintiff for her injuries and expenses arising out of the same accident.

Torts - Policeman As Licensee, William T. Lehner

William & Mary Law Review

No abstract provided.

Federal Civil Procedure-Venue-Effect Of 1948 Judicial Code Definition Of Corporate Residence On Venue Under The Jones Act, Mary Mandana Long

Michigan Law Review

Plaintiff seaman, having been injured while serving on a vessel owned and operated by the defendant corporations, brought a civil action in federal district court alleging claims for negligence under the Jones Act, for unseaworthiness, and for maintenance and cure. The venue provision of the Jones Act requires that actions under it be brought in the district in which the defendant employer resides or in which his principal office is located. Plaintiff filed his complaint in the Western District of Pennsylvania although defendants were incorporated and maintained their principal offices in Louisiana. Defendants' motions to dismiss on the ground of …

A Rule Is A Rule Because It Is The Rule: Intellectual Crisis In Conflict Of Laws, E. F. Roberts

Cornell Law Faculty Publications

No abstract provided.

Private Insurance As A Solution To The Driver-Guest Dilemm, Harvey R. Friedman

Michigan Law Review

The duty of the driver of an automobile to his nonpaying passenger, and liability arising from the breach of that duty, has long presented a troublesome area of litigation for the courts and the parties involved. Application of standards unsuited for the peculiar risks of automotive transportation has produced inadequate compensation in some cases and excessive recoveries in others. Meanwhile, trial calendars are overcrowded with personal injury litigation, and insurance companies must bear the awards of sympathetic juries and those resulting from collusion between passenger and driver. The over-all expense of this method of determination of liability, far too little …

Torts--Negligence--Substantial Factor Test, Russell B. Mamone

Case Western Reserve Law Review

No abstract provided.

Proximate Cause And The Pennsylvania Supreme Court: Twenty-Five Years In Review, Francois R. Cross

Villanova Law Review

No abstract provided.

Hunting Accident Liability, Vincent A. Feudo

Cleveland State Law Review

Increased interest in hunting for pleasure has led to an increased number of mishaps. Recent statistics show one injury for every 7,800 hunters, with one in every five or six fatal. From early to more recent cases it has generally been held that where one is not negligent in the handling of his weapon he is not liable. But "ordinary care" while hunting means a high degree of care, due to the inherent nature of the sport.

Charitable Liability For Tort, Edith L. Fisch

Villanova Law Review

No abstract provided.

Pennsylvania's Good Samaritan Statute - An Answer To The Medical Profession's Dilemma, Joseph F. Busacca

Villanova Law Review

No abstract provided.