Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Law Commons

Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®

Legal Philosophy

Law and Philosophy

Selected Works

Michael S. Green

Publication Year

Articles 1 - 7 of 7

Full-Text Articles in Law

The Semantics And Pragmatics Of Legal Statements, Michael S. Green Sep 2019

The Semantics And Pragmatics Of Legal Statements, Michael S. Green

Michael S. Green

No abstract provided.


The New Eliminativism, Michael S. Green Sep 2019

The New Eliminativism, Michael S. Green

Michael S. Green

No abstract provided.


Prediction Theories Of Law And The Internal Point Of View, Michael S. Green Sep 2019

Prediction Theories Of Law And The Internal Point Of View, Michael S. Green

Michael S. Green

No abstract provided.


On Hart's Category Mistake, Michael S. Green Sep 2019

On Hart's Category Mistake, Michael S. Green

Michael S. Green

This essay concerns Scott Shapiro’s criticism that H.L.A. Hart’s theory of law suffers from a “category mistake.” Although other philosophers of law have summarily dismissed Shapiro’s criticism, I argue that it identifies an important requirement for an adequate theory of law. Such a theory must explain why legal officials justify their actions by reference to abstract propositional entities, instead of pointing to the existence of social practices. A virtue of Shapiro’s planning theory of law is that it can explain this phenomenon. Despite these sympathies, however, I end with the suggestion that Shapiro’s criticism of Hart, as it stands, is …


Leiter On The Legal Realists, Michael S. Green Jun 2013

Leiter On The Legal Realists, Michael S. Green

Michael S. Green

In this essay reviewing Brian Leiter’s recent book Naturalizing Jurisprudence, I focus on two positions that distinguish Leiter’s reading of the American legal realists from those offered in the past. The first is his claim that the realists thought the law is only locally indeterminate – primarily in cases that are appealed. The second is his claim that they did not offer a prediction theory of law, but were instead committed to a standard positivist theory. Leiter’s reading is vulnerable, because he fails to discuss in detail those passages from the realists that inspired past interpretations. My goal is to …


Dworkin's Fallacy, Or What The Philosophy Of Language Can't Teach Us About The Law, Michael S. Green Jun 2013

Dworkin's Fallacy, Or What The Philosophy Of Language Can't Teach Us About The Law, Michael S. Green

Michael S. Green

No abstract provided.


Legal Realism, Lex Fori, And The Choice-Of-Law Revolution, Michael S. Green Jun 2013

Legal Realism, Lex Fori, And The Choice-Of-Law Revolution, Michael S. Green

Michael S. Green

No abstract provided.