Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Publication
- File Type
Articles 1 - 2 of 2
Full-Text Articles in Law
Los Jueces Constitucionales, La Política Y La Deferencia Judicial, Rodrigo A. Poyanco Bugueño
Los Jueces Constitucionales, La Política Y La Deferencia Judicial, Rodrigo A. Poyanco Bugueño
Rodrigo A. Poyanco Bugueño
When the constitutional judge imposes a certain ideology trough their sentences, to the detriment of other doctrines that are legitimately beaten in the democratic game, not only ognores the essential differences between politics and law, but also damages the powers of Parliament and, ultimately, the political autonomy of the society. In response, the doctrine of judicial deference reminds us the limitations of constitutional doctrines as tools for resolving political problems given the importance of preserving that autonomy
Captured Legislatures And Public-Interested Courts, Patrick Luff
Captured Legislatures And Public-Interested Courts, Patrick Luff
Patrick A. Luff
According to public choice, the predominant paradigm of modern regulatory theory, legislative activity provides benefits to small, organized interests at the expense of larger groups. In practice, this means that interest groups are often able to benefit themselves at the expense of the public good. This model has been extended to the courts, which are described as implicit or explicit actors in the wealth-transfer process. Applying public-choice theory to the courts, however, overlooks the structural differences between the federal judiciary and Congress, as well as the insights of judicial decisionmaking theory. Not only do judges receive better and more complete …