Law Commons^™

Why Wait Until The Crime Happens? Providing For The Involuntary Commitment Of Dangerous Individuals Without Requiring A Showing Of Mental Illness, Adam Lamparello

Adam Lamparello

No abstract provided.

The Responsibility Gap: The Cia, Covert Actions And Violations Of International Law, Angela Huddleston

Angela Huddleston

Throughout the course of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the United States of America has committed covert actions in virtually every major region in the world, particularly during the Cold War. These actions are not without their repercussions and have often led to massive violations of international law and human rights. Yet the US is not held responsible for its actions due to legal deficiencies that allow it to breach some of the most basic rules of international law without accountability. This paper examines the obligations of international law concerning covert actions before turning to state responsibility and highlighting the …

The Wisdom Of Solomon: Why We Can't Split The Pre-Embryo, Bridget M. Fuselier

Bridget M Fuselier

Due to the fact that there are at least 500,000 cryo-preserved pre-embryos and a very small amount of common law or statutes to provide guidance, legislators need to act and take steps to guide the people impacted by these problems.

This article promotes modifications to property concepts that protects the special dignity of the pre-embryo while also recognizing the autonomy of the individual gamete providers. The article proposes a form of ownership that would prevent the pre-embryos from passing through wills and by intestate succession. It would also eliminate the possibility of ending up with a multitude of owners for …

Exceptions: The Criminal Law's Illogical Approach To Hiv-Related Aggravated Assaults, Ari E. Waldman

Ari E Waldman

This article identifies logical and due process errors in cases involving HIV-related aggravated assaults, which usually involve an HIV-positive individual having unprotected sex without disclosing his or her HIV status. While this behavior should not be encouraged, this paper suggests that punishing this conduct through a charge of aggravated assault – which requires a showing that the defendant’s actions were a means likely to cause grievous bodily harm or death – is fraught with fallacies in reasoning and runs afoul of due process. Specifically, some courts use the rule of thumb that HIV can possibly be transmitted through bodily fluids …

Introductory Note To The Extraordinary Chambers Of The Courts Of Cambodia: Decision On The Appeals Against The Co-Investigative Judges Order On Joint Criminal Enterprise (Jce), Benjamin E. Brockman-Hawe

Benjamin E. Brockman-Hawe

No abstract provided.

Whether Foreigner Or Alien: A New Look At The Original Language Of The Alien Tort Statute, M. Anderson Berry

M. Anderson Berry

Until now, the word that puts the ‘A’ in ATS has been completely overlooked. No court or commentator has delved in to the 1789 meaning of “alien,” or to the drafters' understanding of and possible intentions behind that word.

In the Supreme Court’s only opinion regarding the Alien Tort Statute, Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, the Court unanimously agreed that although the first House of Representatives modified the Senate’s draft of what eventually became the Judiciary Act of 1789, it made hardly any changes to the provisions on aliens, including what became the ATS. The Court did not point out any of …

Questioning The Un's Immunity In The Dutch Courts; Unresolved Issues In The Mothers Of Srebrenica Litigation, Benjamin E. Brockman-Hawe

Benjamin E. Brockman-Hawe

Providing victims with a judicial forum where they can air their grievances and obtain redress for violations of their rights is regarded as the cornerstone of an international culture of accountability, and restrictions on the right of access to a court must not run afoul of international law's prohibition on the denial of justice. The operation of international organisations, on the other hand, is predicated on the notion that shielding them from the normal processes of the law by providing for their immunity before national courts is the only way to ensure their effectiveness. When an international organization tasked with …

Towards A Gender-Inclusive Definition Of Child Soldiers: The Prosecutor V. Thomas Lubanga Dyilo, Kristin M. Gallagher

Kristin M Gallagher

The trial of Thomas Lubanga Dyilo (“Thomas Lubanga”) will set international precedent for crimes related to child soldiers. As it is the first trial before the International Criminal Court (“ICC” or the Court), the Court will be setting a standard for interpreting what it means to conscript, enlist or use child soldiers actively in combat. This paper argues that the trial of Thomas Lubanga Dyilo currently before the International Criminal Court represents an opportunity for a precedent-setting decision regarding the use of child soldiers. It also argues for an interpretation of the law that recognizes the changing face of war …

Snyder V. Phelps & The Supreme Court's Speech-Tort Jurisprudence: A Prediction, Deana Ann Pollard Sacks

Deana A Pollard

In Snyder v. Phelps, members of the Westboro Baptist Church targeted a young marine’s untimely death to exemplify their hate-filled message to the world that “God Hates Fags” and retaliates against America for tolerating homosexuality by killing American soldiers. A jury awarded the marine’s father $10.9 million for invasion of privacy and emotional distress after the church members disseminated extremely hateful and personalized attacks against the fallen marine’s family. The Supreme Court is reviewing the case to determine whether civil liability based on invasive, hate-filled, injurious speech violates the First Amendment. In New York Times v. Sullivan, the Supreme Court …

Escaping Legal Limbo: Can Illinois Residents Who Entered Into A Legally Recognized Same-Sex Marriage Or Civil Union In Another State Dissolve Their Marriage In Illinois?, Michelle R. Green, Allen Wall, Jacob H. Karaca, Melissa Sereda

Michelle R. Green

Legal limbo: when a same-sex couple in a valid, legally performed marriage performed in a jurisdiction that recognizes such marriages wants to dissolve their marriage, but now lives in a jurisdiction that refuses to recognize their marriage as valid. This article explores the options available to such couples in Illinois and provides a practical roadmap for practitioners that we think provides the best chance of success for their clients seeking to dissolve a same-sex union.

While Illinois courts have not yet determined whether such a couple may lawfully dissolve their marriage in Illinois, many lessons can be gleaned from other …

The Meaning Of Justice In The World Today, Louis E. Wolcher

Louis E Wolcher

Justice does not stand in relation to law as a blueprint does to a building. Thus, any human practice that thinks of itself as just is a priori unjust. Justice requires the willingness to notice the tragic particular even though one's own conception of justice does not consider it relevant or important. This essay traces the connections between law and justice, and justice and individual ethical responsibility, to reach a conclusion that many may find surprising if not scandalous: Justice denied is undoubtedly a tragedy, but so too is justice achieved.

Yes, I Can: Subjective Legal Empowerment, Martin Gramatikov, Robert B. Porter

Martin Gramatikov

This paper explores critically the notion of legal empowerment and suggests that the currently employed approaches lead to vague concepts which evade measurement and lend little programmatic guidance. Our thesis is that legal empowerment should be sought not in the process of providing legal solutions but in the subjective self-belief that a person posses and can mobilize the necessary resources, competencies and energies to solve particular problem of legal nature. This model rejects the existence of an overall quantity of legal empowerment. People’s beliefs in their ability to solve legal problems differ by type of problem, distribution of power in …

The Fiduciary Theory Of Governmental Legitimacy And The Natural Charter Of The Judiciary, Luke A. Wake

Luke A. Wake

In legal academia, there are various claims as to the proper role of the courts and the standard of review to be employed in evaluating claims of right. These competing judicial philosophies have been the subject of great debate in recent years. Yet underlying these debates is the question of rights and whether men are entitled, in justice, to assurances of personal autonomy, or whether the concept of rights is a mere legal fiction.

In a recent article in the Journal of Law and Philosophy, Evan Fox-Decent argues that individuals are entitled, at a minimum, to certain guarantees of bodily …

International Civil Religion: Respecting Religious Diversity While Promoting International Cooperation, Amos Prosser Davis

Amos Prosser Davis

International civil religion grounds moral claims that permeate and transcend traditional religious paradigms. Given the inevitability of international interactions – interactions that cross geographic, religious, and cultural boundaries – our global society is in need of a universally endorsable framework that undergirds the United Nations international human rights regime. International civil religion provides that framework.

Numerous scholars and moral theorists have incrementally discerned the parameters of civil religion including, inter alia, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Alexis de Tocqueville, Robert Bellah, Martin Marty, and Harold Berman. The tenets of international civil religion infuse the diplomatically drafted United Nations covenants and conventions on human …

Human Trafficking: Iraq - A Case Study, Ali Allawi

Ali Allawi

The accompanying Article explores the issue of human trafficking and sexual exploitation in postwar Iraq. It attempts, in three steps to firstly identify the issue of human trafficking and how it pertains to Iraq, secondly to examine Iraq’s international legal obligations to address the human rights violations and human trafficking issues, and lastly, recommend implementable solutions that the Iraqi government can take to meet its international obligations and remedy the problem at hand. The Article sheds new light on the growing humanitarian crisis in post war Iraq and brings awareness of the monumental challenges that face both the government and …

Facilitating Friendly Settlements In The Inter-American Human Rights System: A Comparative Analysis With Recommendations, Sean B. Burke, Matthew P. Webster

Sean B Burke

No abstract provided.

Addressing The Special Problems Of Mentally Ill Prisoners: A Small Piece Of The Solution To Our Nation's Prison Crisis, Michael Vitiello

Michael Vitiello

After years of neglect, policymakers must confront a crisis in our prisons created by the increasing number of mentally ill prisoners. Mentally ill prisoners are both vulnerable and troublesome. Apart from their special needs, they are an increasing segment of the prison population. Their numbers have risen roughly in proportion with the release of the mentally ill from mental hospitals and the closing of those institutions. As states look for ways to reduce prison costs, meaningful reform may be in the air. That may allow a reexamination of policies that have led to the increase in mentally ill-prisoners. But if …

Can Cia Interrogators Relying Upon Government Counsel Advice Be Prosecuted For Torture?, Adam M. Hochroth

Adam M Hochroth

In the spring of 2002, the CIA sought advice from the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) regarding an interrogation program for high-level al Qaeda detainees. The proposed program included the use of techniques such as walling, stress positions, confinement, sleep deprivation and waterboarding. On August 1, 2002, the OLC provided two memoranda of advice to the CIA on the lawfulness of the proposed program and the specific techniques intended. The OLC advised that the program and the techniques were lawful and did not constitute torture within the meaning of the Torture Statute, 18 U.S.C. §§2340–2340A. This article considers whether interrogators …

Applying Torture And Asylum Protections To Prevent The Deportation Of Persons With Hiv/Aids, Christine Chiu

Christine Chiu

Granting a foreign national with HIV/AIDS permission to remain in a country, whether temporarily or indefinitely, is a weighty decision. Faced with limited resources and often fervent public antagonism towards increased immigration, states must pick and choose whom to expel from its borders. This paper examines the extent to which HIV status is considered in determining whether a petitioner is eligible or even has a right to remain in a country. The analysis consists largely of a comparison of the asylum and torture protections afforded to petitioners with HIV/AIDS in the United States, Canada, and the European Court of Human …

Emergent Disability & The Limits Of Equality: A Critical Reading Of The Un Convention On The Rights Of Persons With Disabilities, Elizabeth R. Ribet

Elizabeth R Ribet

The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities marks a shift in international legal relationships to and conceptions of disability. The Convention is the first binding international instrument of its kind related to disability. Its premises differ from the earlier World Programme on Disability, and more closely integrate the frameworks of U.S. domestic equal protection and disability civil rights law. Drawing on critical race and feminist theoretical literature, this paper critically examines the implications of internationalizing a U.S. disability law framework, with particular attention to the problem of "emergent disability", or disability which is specifically produced as a …

Emergent Disability & The Limits Of Equality: A Critical Reading Of The Un Convention On The Rights Of Persons With Disabilities, Elizabeth R. Ribet

Elizabeth R Ribet

The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities marks a shift in international legal relationships to and conceptions of disability. The Convention is the first binding international instrument of its kind related to disability. Its premises differ from the earlier World Programme on Disability, and more closely integrate the frameworks of U.S. domestic equal protection and disability civil rights law. Drawing on critical race and feminist theoretical literature, this paper critically examines the implications of internationalizing a U.S. disability law framework, with particular attention to the problem of "emergent disability", or disability which is specifically produced as a …

Emergent Disability & The Limits Of Equality: A Critical Reading Of The Un Convention On The Rights Of Persons With Disabilities, Elizabeth R. Ribet

Elizabeth R Ribet

The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities marks a shift in international legal relationships to and conceptions of disability. The Convention is the first binding international instrument of its kind related to disability. Its premises differ from the earlier World Programme on Disability, and more closely integrate the frameworks of U.S. domestic equal protection and disability civil rights law. Drawing on critical race and feminist theoretical literature, this paper critically examines the implications of internationalizing a U.S. disability law framework, with particular attention to the problem of "emergent disability", or disability which is specifically produced as a …

A Final Obstacle: Barriers To Divorce For Immigrant Victims Of Domestic Violence In The United States, Mariela Olivares

Mariela Olivares

Low-income immigrant victims of domestic violence face significant—and understudied—social, legal and political obstacles in obtaining divorces from their abusive spouses. Moreover, funding restrictions on legal service providers often prohibit their representation of victims in divorce proceedings, which further reduces immigrant victims’ ability to obtain meaningful divorce relief. These issues are virtually unexamined in the scholarly literature; the problem of the abused, immigrant wife seeking a divorce has been given short shrift. This Article examines the problems confronting this community then proposes reforms to address its particular needs. Part I explores the unique condition of the immigrant living in the United …

A Kind Of Judgment: Searching For Judicial Narratives After Death, Timothy W. Waters

Timothy W Waters

This Article is a work of original research interrogating the relationship between international criminal law and post-conflict reconciliation. Much of international criminal law’s attraction rests on the authoritative narrative theory: the claim that law’s authoritative judgments create incontestable narratives, which form the foundation for reconciliation in divided societies. So what happens when there is no judgment? By turning scholarship’s attention towards a terminated trial, this Article develops an indirect but powerful challenge to one of the dominant views about what international criminal law is for, with interdisciplinary implications for international law, international relations, diplomacy and political science. What can be …

Do Not Blame Non-Signatory Countries: Take Your Own Preventive Measures To Protect Children From Internationl Abduction, Ho Kon Yoo

Ho Kon Yoo

DO NOT BLAME NON-SINGATORY COUNTRIES: TAKE YOUR OWN PREVENTIVE MEASURES TO PROTECT CHILDREN FROM INTERNATIONAL ABDUCTION Hokon Stephen Yoo

This Note recommends a preventive legal measure to protect children from international abduction rather than the existing post-abduction remedies. The Hague Convention of International Child Abduction has limited to help the leftover parent when another spouse wrongfully removes a child because the Convention lacks enforceability. To supplement the Hague Convention’s post-abduction remedies, this Note proposes a practical pre-abduction measure, an e-Child database program that judicial, legislative, administrative, and enforcement agencies could share. This Note recommends that each country, regardless of its …

A “Supremer” Court?: How An Unfavorable Ruling In The Inter-American Commission On Human Rights Should Impact United States Domestic Violence Jurisprudence, Ethan G. Kate

Ethan G. Kate

After her substantive and procedural due process claims were dismissed in the Supreme Court, Jessica Gonzales took the unprecedented step of filing a claim with the Inter-American Commission of Human Rights, the first time such an allegation of human rights violations had been brought against the United States. Gonzales’ case has implicated two hot-button issues in modern United States jurisprudence: domestic violence prevention and the role of international law in domestic courts. Several scholars have looked at Gonzales’ case as it relates either to domestic violence or international law, but few have looked at the interplay between both issues. Specifically, …

Parental Authority, Circumcision And The Child's Right To An Open Future, Robert Darby

Robert Darby

In April 2010 the American Academy of Pediatrics released a new policy on female circumcision that accepted the right of parents to impose, and recommended that its members perform, mild forms of genital cutting on girls, such as a “ritual nick” to the clitoris. The suggestion caused some astonishment, and was rapidly withdrawn, but its author, Dena Davis, has defended it, arguing that it is not acceptable to criminalise all female genital cutting while tolerating male circumcision; this is to show respect for only those religious and cultural practices with which they are already comfortable. Davis suggests that if physicians …

Trade, Labor And International Governance: An Inquiry Into The Potential Effectiveness Of The New International Labor Law, Kevin Banks

Kevin Banks

Globalization has led states and civil society groups to seek new and more effective governance in international labor law. The United States and Canada have each concluded a path-breaking, controversial and still-evolving series of international trade-related labor agreements with their trading partners. These agreements, and ongoing critiques that continue to influence their development, have been shaped by a particular model of governance. That model seeks, in the interests of effectiveness, a set of sharply defined rules and court-like adjudication processes directly linked to economic sanctions. The potential effectiveness of this governance model has received no systematic evaluation. This article undertakes …

Security Council Targeted Sanctions, Due Process And The 1267 Ombudsperson, Grant L. Willis

Grant L Willis

Since its inception the Security Council’s 1267 sanctions regime has come under fire from UN member states, listed individuals and entities, domestic and international courts and tribunals, human rights NGO’s and even other organs of the UN, that all claim the 1267 sanctions regime does not secure targeted individuals’ procedural due process rights, particularly the right to an effective remedy. For instance, in June 2009 a Canadian Federal Court Judge noted that the 1267 sanctions regime creates a situation for the listed individual that is “not unlike that of Josef K. in Kafka’s The Trial, who awakens one morning, and …

Are Immigration Officials Overturning Plyler V. Doe?, Andres J. Ortiz

Andres J Ortiz

In 1982, the Supreme Court determined that a Texas statute, which forced children who had not been “legally admitted to the United States” to pay tuition to attend public schools unconstitutionally denied these children’s equal access to a public school education. Justice Brennan reasoned that because undocumented children are largely victims of circumstances beyond their control, it would be fundamentally unjust to deny these children equal access to a public school education. Further, that requiring undocumented children pay tuition would institute a barrier to education that would create a caste of illiterate people who would have little to no access …