Open Access. Powered by Scholars. Published by Universities.®
- Discipline
- Institution
- Publication
- Publication Type
Articles 1 - 5 of 5
Full-Text Articles in Law
Don't Tap, Don't Stare, And Keep Your Hands To Yourself! Critiquing The Legality Of Gay Sting Operations, Jordan Woods
Don't Tap, Don't Stare, And Keep Your Hands To Yourself! Critiquing The Legality Of Gay Sting Operations, Jordan Woods
Jordan Blair Woods
A New Battleground For Free Speech: The Impact Of Snyder V. Phelps, Jason M. Dorsky
A New Battleground For Free Speech: The Impact Of Snyder V. Phelps, Jason M. Dorsky
The University of New Hampshire Law Review
[Excerpt] “On September 25, 1789, the First Congress of the United States put forth a set of constitutional amendments, ten of which would later become the Bill of Rights. The first of these amendments states, ―Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech . . . . In subsequent caselaw, the U.S. Supreme Court has applied this prohibition to the federal government, as well as state governments through the Fourteenth Amendment. Although this appears to be a simple standard to follow, history has proven otherwise, and …
Consent To Monitoring Of Electronic Communications Of Employees As An Aspect Of Liberty And Dignity: Looking To Europe., Matthew A. Chivvis
Consent To Monitoring Of Electronic Communications Of Employees As An Aspect Of Liberty And Dignity: Looking To Europe., Matthew A. Chivvis
Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal
No abstract provided.
The 39th Congress (1865-1867) And The 14th Amendment: Some Preliminary Perspectives, Richard L. Aynes
The 39th Congress (1865-1867) And The 14th Amendment: Some Preliminary Perspectives, Richard L. Aynes
The 39th Congress Project
No abstract provided.
140th Anniversary Symposium: Fourteenth Amendment Citizenship And The Reconstruction-Era Black Public Sphere, James Fox
Con Law Center Articles and Publications
This project delves more deeply into the possible meanings of constitutional citizenship.. Somewhat in the tradition of the popular constitutionalism scholars, it proposes that the best source for meanings of constitutional citizenship will come not from traditionally originalist sources but from those who attempted to redefine citizenship in a more egalitarian and democratic manner and who established, both in word and in practice, meanings for citizenship on the ground. This argument borrows a theoretical framework from political and social theory: the theories of civil society and the public sphere. This captures—in ways often missed by both legal scholars and historians—the …