Law Commons^™

Selecting Scrutiny In Compelled-Speech Cases Involving Non-Commercial Expression: The Formulaic Landscape Of A Strict Scrutiny World After Becerra And Janus, And A First Amendment Interests-And-Values Alternative, Clay Calvert

Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal

This Article examines how courts select the standard of scrutiny—strict, intermediate, or something akin to rational basis—in compelled-speech disputes following the United States Supreme Court’s 2018 rulings in National Institute of Family and Life Advocates v. Becerra and Janus v. American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees. The compelled-speech doctrine provides individuals and entities with a qualified First Amendment right not to be forced by the government to convey messages under certain circumstances. This principle sometimes is referred to as an unenumerated First Amendment right not to speak. The Article concentrates on compelled-speech mandates involving non-commercial expression in …